%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS105+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:31 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.58s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.10/0.12 % Problem : KRS105+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.10/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 14:13:08 EDT 2024 % 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime : % 0.17/0.54 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.17/0.57 %------------------------------------------- % 0.17/0.57 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.17/0.57 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.17/0.57 % Transform :cnf % 0.17/0.57 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.17/0.57 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.17/0.57 % 0.17/0.57 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s % 0.17/0.57 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s % 0.17/0.57 %------------------------------------------- % 0.17/0.57 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.17/0.57 % File : KRS105+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.17/0.57 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web) % 0.17/0.57 % Problem : DL Test: fact2.1 % 0.17/0.57 % Version : Especial. % 0.17/0.57 % English : % 0.17/0.57 % 0.17/0.57 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.17/0.57 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW % 0.17/0.57 % Source : [Bec03] % 0.17/0.57 % Names : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest602 [Bec03] % 0.17/0.57 % 0.17/0.57 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.17/0.57 % Rating : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.25 v6.1.0, 0.00 v3.1.0 % 0.17/0.57 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 1 unt; 0 def) % 0.17/0.57 % Number of atoms : 21 ( 0 equ) % 0.17/0.57 % Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg) % 0.17/0.57 % Number of connectives : 14 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 1 &) % 0.17/0.57 % ( 4 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.17/0.57 % Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 4 avg) % 0.17/0.57 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.17/0.57 % Number of predicates : 11 ( 11 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.17/0.57 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.17/0.57 % Number of variables : 13 ( 11 !; 2 ?) % 0.17/0.57 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_NEQ % 0.17/0.57 % 0.17/0.57 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of % 0.17/0.57 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's % 0.17/0.57 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL. % 0.17/0.57 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.17/0.57 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.17/0.57 fof(axiom_0,axiom, % 0.17/0.57 ! [X] : % 0.17/0.57 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.17/0.57 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ). % 0.17/0.57 % 0.17/0.57 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.17/0.57 fof(axiom_1,axiom, % 0.17/0.57 ! [X] : % 0.17/0.57 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.17/0.57 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ). % 0.17/0.57 % 0.17/0.57 %----Super cUnsatisfiable % 0.17/0.57 fof(axiom_2,axiom, % 0.17/0.57 ! [X] : % 0.17/0.57 ( cUnsatisfiable(X) % 0.17/0.57 => cdxcomp(X) ) ). % 0.17/0.57 % 0.17/0.57 %----Super cUnsatisfiable % 0.17/0.57 fof(axiom_3,axiom, % 0.17/0.57 ! [X] : % 0.17/0.57 ( cUnsatisfiable(X) % 0.17/0.57 => cc(X) ) ). % 0.17/0.57 % 0.17/0.57 %----Super cc % 0.17/0.57 fof(axiom_4,axiom, % 0.17/0.57 ! [X] : % 0.17/0.57 ( cc(X) % 0.17/0.58 => ! [Y] : % 0.17/0.58 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.17/0.58 => cc(Y) ) ) ). % 0.17/0.58 % 0.17/0.58 %----Equality cd % 0.17/0.58 fof(axiom_5,axiom, % 0.17/0.58 ! [X] : % 0.17/0.58 ( cd(X) % 0.17/0.58 <=> ~ ? [Y] : ra_Px1(X,Y) ) ). % 0.17/0.58 % 0.17/0.58 %----Equality cdxcomp % 0.17/0.58 fof(axiom_6,axiom, % 0.17/0.58 ! [X] : % 0.17/0.58 ( cdxcomp(X) % 0.17/0.58 <=> ? [Y0] : ra_Px1(X,Y0) ) ). % 0.17/0.58 % 0.17/0.58 %----Equality ca_Ax2 % 0.17/0.58 fof(axiom_7,axiom, % 0.17/0.58 ! [X] : % 0.17/0.58 ( ca_Ax2(X) % 0.17/0.58 <=> ! [Y] : % 0.17/0.58 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.17/0.58 => cc(Y) ) ) ). % 0.17/0.58 % 0.17/0.58 %----Super ca_Ax2 % 0.17/0.58 fof(axiom_8,axiom, % 0.17/0.58 ! [X] : % 0.17/0.58 ( ca_Ax2(X) % 0.17/0.58 => cd(X) ) ). % 0.17/0.58 % 0.17/0.58 %----i2003_11_14_17_20_53634 % 0.17/0.58 fof(axiom_9,axiom, % 0.17/0.58 cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634) ). % 0.17/0.58 % 0.17/0.58 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.17/0.58 %------------------------------------------- % 0.17/0.58 % Proof found % 0.17/0.58 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.17/0.58 % SZS output start Proof % 0.17/0.58 %ClaNum:15(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.17/0.58 %VarNum:36(SingletonVarNum:18) % 0.17/0.58 %MaxLitNum:3 % 0.17/0.58 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.17/0.58 %SharedTerms:2 % 0.17/0.58 [1]P1(a1) % 0.17/0.58 [2]~P2(x21) % 0.17/0.58 [3]P8(x31)+P7(x31) % 0.17/0.58 [4]~P1(x41)+P3(x41) % 0.17/0.58 [5]~P1(x51)+P4(x51) % 0.17/0.58 [6]~P5(x61)+P6(x61) % 0.17/0.58 [7]~P8(x71)+~P7(x71) % 0.17/0.58 [8]P5(x81)+~P4(f2(x81)) % 0.17/0.58 [9]P6(x91)+P9(x91,f3(x91)) % 0.17/0.58 [10]P5(x101)+P10(x101,f2(x101)) % 0.17/0.58 [12]~P3(x121)+P9(x121,f4(x121)) % 0.17/0.58 [11]P3(x111)+~P9(x111,x112) % 0.17/0.58 [13]~P6(x131)+~P9(x131,x132) % 0.17/0.58 [14]~P10(x142,x141)+P4(x141)+~P4(x142) % 0.17/0.58 [15]~P10(x152,x151)+P4(x151)+~P5(x152) % 0.17/0.58 %EqnAxiom % 0.17/0.58 % 0.17/0.58 %------------------------------------------- % 0.17/0.58 cnf(17,plain, % 0.17/0.58 (P9(a1,f4(a1))), % 0.17/0.58 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,12])). % 0.17/0.58 cnf(19,plain, % 0.17/0.58 (~P5(a1)), % 0.17/0.58 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,6,13])). % 0.17/0.58 cnf(22,plain, % 0.17/0.58 (P6(x221)+P10(x221,f2(x221))), % 0.17/0.58 inference(scs_inference,[],[10,6])). % 0.17/0.58 cnf(23,plain, % 0.17/0.58 (P4(f2(x231))+~P4(x231)+P6(x231)), % 0.17/0.58 inference(scs_inference,[],[22,14])). % 0.17/0.58 cnf(27,plain, % 0.17/0.58 (P6(a1)+P4(f2(a1))), % 0.17/0.58 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,23,5])). % 0.17/0.58 cnf(28,plain, % 0.17/0.58 (P6(a1)), % 0.17/0.58 inference(scs_inference,[],[19,27,8])). % 0.17/0.58 cnf(29,plain, % 0.17/0.58 ($false), % 0.17/0.58 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,17,13]), % 0.17/0.58 ['proof']). % 0.17/0.58 % SZS output end Proof % 0.17/0.58 % Total time :0.010000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------