↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : KRS105+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:36:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.25s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   69 (  30   ~;  26   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   1 sgn  23   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_5,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( cd(X1)
    <=> ~ ? [X2] : ra_Px1(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

fof(axiom_6,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( cdxcomp(X1)
    <=> ? [X3] : ra_Px1(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X1)
     => cdxcomp(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_8,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ca_Ax2(X1)
     => cd(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_8) ).

fof(axiom_4,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( cc(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( rr(X1,X2)
         => cc(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

fof(axiom_7,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ca_Ax2(X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( rr(X1,X2)
         => cc(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_7) ).

fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X1)
     => cc(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(axiom_9,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_9) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X23,X24,X25] :
      ( ( ~ cd(X23)
        | ~ ra_Px1(X23,X24) )
      & ( ra_Px1(X25,esk1_1(X25))
        | cd(X25) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X27,X29,X30] :
      ( ( ~ cdxcomp(X27)
        | ra_Px1(X27,esk2_1(X27)) )
      & ( ~ ra_Px1(X29,X30)
        | cdxcomp(X29) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_6])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ cd(X1)
    | ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ra_Px1(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cdxcomp(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X19] :
      ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X19)
      | cdxcomp(X19) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ cd(X1)
    | ~ cdxcomp(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( cdxcomp(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X35] :
      ( ~ ca_Ax2(X35)
      | cd(X35) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ cd(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( cd(X1)
    | ~ ca_Ax2(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X21,X22] :
      ( ~ cc(X21)
      | ~ rr(X21,X22)
      | cc(X22) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X31,X32,X33] :
      ( ( ~ ca_Ax2(X31)
        | ~ rr(X31,X32)
        | cc(X32) )
      & ( rr(X33,esk3_1(X33))
        | ca_Ax2(X33) )
      & ( ~ cc(esk3_1(X33))
        | ca_Ax2(X33) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_7])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X20] :
      ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X20)
      | cc(X20) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Ax2(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( cc(X2)
    | ~ cc(X1)
    | ~ rr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( rr(X1,esk3_1(X1))
    | ca_Ax2(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ca_Ax2(X1)
    | ~ cc(esk3_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( cc(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ~ ca_Ax2(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ca_Ax2(X1)
    | ~ cc(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    cc(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : KRS105+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:37:34 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.72  % Total time : 1.374s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------