↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : KRS106+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:31 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem    : KRS106+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 13:46:54 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.53/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.74  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.74  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.53/0.74  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.74  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.53/0.74  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.53/0.74  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.53/0.74  
% 0.53/0.74  % Result      :Theorem 0.110000s
% 0.53/0.74  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.110000s
% 0.53/0.74  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.74  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.74  % File     : KRS106+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.53/0.74  % Domain   : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web)
% 0.53/0.74  % Problem  : DL Test: fact3.1
% 0.53/0.74  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.53/0.74  % English  :
% 0.53/0.74  
% 0.53/0.74  % Refs     : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.53/0.74  %          : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW
% 0.53/0.74  % Source   : [Bec03]
% 0.53/0.74  % Names    : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest603 [Bec03]
% 0.53/0.74  
% 0.53/0.74  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.53/0.74  % Rating   : 0.00 v3.1.0
% 0.53/0.74  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   1 unt;   0 def)
% 0.53/0.74  %            Number of atoms       :   77 (  19 equ)
% 0.53/0.74  %            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
% 0.53/0.74  %            Number of connectives :   53 (   3   ~;   0   |;  25   &)
% 0.53/0.74  %                                         (   4 <=>;  21  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.53/0.74  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   5 avg)
% 0.53/0.74  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.53/0.74  %            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.53/0.74  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.53/0.74  %            Number of variables   :   63 (  58   !;   5   ?)
% 0.53/0.74  % SPC      : FOF_UNS_RFO_SEQ
% 0.53/0.74  
% 0.53/0.74  % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of
% 0.53/0.74  %            datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's
% 0.53/0.74  %            still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL.
% 0.53/0.74  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.74  fof(cUnsatisfiable_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.74      ! [A,B] :
% 0.53/0.74        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.74          & cUnsatisfiable(A) )
% 0.53/0.74       => cUnsatisfiable(B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.74  
% 0.53/0.74  fof(cowlNothing_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.74      ! [A,B] :
% 0.53/0.74        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & cowlNothing(A) )
% 0.53/0.75       => cowlNothing(B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(cowlThing_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & cowlThing(A) )
% 0.53/0.75       => cowlThing(B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(cp1_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & cp1(A) )
% 0.53/0.75       => cp1(B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(cp1xcomp_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & cp1xcomp(A) )
% 0.53/0.75       => cp1xcomp(B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(cp2_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & cp2(A) )
% 0.53/0.75       => cp2(B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(ra_Px1_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & ra_Px1(A,C) )
% 0.53/0.75       => ra_Px1(B,C) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(ra_Px1_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & ra_Px1(C,A) )
% 0.53/0.75       => ra_Px1(C,B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(rf1_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & rf1(A,C) )
% 0.53/0.75       => rf1(B,C) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(rf1_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & rf1(C,A) )
% 0.53/0.75       => rf1(C,B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(rf2_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & rf2(A,C) )
% 0.53/0.75       => rf2(B,C) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(rf2_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & rf2(C,A) )
% 0.53/0.75       => rf2(C,B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(rf3_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & rf3(A,C) )
% 0.53/0.75       => rf3(B,C) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(rf3_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & rf3(C,A) )
% 0.53/0.75       => rf3(C,B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(xsd_integer_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & xsd_integer(A) )
% 0.53/0.75       => xsd_integer(B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(xsd_string_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [A,B] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( A = B
% 0.53/0.75          & xsd_string(A) )
% 0.53/0.75       => xsd_string(B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.53/0.75  fof(axiom_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [X] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.53/0.75        & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.53/0.75  fof(axiom_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [X] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.53/0.75      <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  %----Equality cUnsatisfiable
% 0.53/0.75  fof(axiom_2,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [X] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
% 0.53/0.75      <=> ( ? [Y] :
% 0.53/0.75              ( rf3(X,Y)
% 0.53/0.75              & cp2(Y) )
% 0.53/0.75          & ? [Y] :
% 0.53/0.75              ( rf1(X,Y)
% 0.53/0.75              & cp1(Y) )
% 0.53/0.75          & ? [Y] :
% 0.53/0.75              ( rf2(X,Y)
% 0.53/0.75              & cp1xcomp(Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  %----Equality cp1
% 0.53/0.75  fof(axiom_3,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [X] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( cp1(X)
% 0.53/0.75      <=> ~ ? [Y] : ra_Px1(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  %----Equality cp1xcomp
% 0.53/0.75  fof(axiom_4,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [X] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( cp1xcomp(X)
% 0.53/0.75      <=> ? [Y0] : ra_Px1(X,Y0) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  %----Functional: rf1
% 0.53/0.75  fof(axiom_5,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( rf1(X,Y)
% 0.53/0.75          & rf1(X,Z) )
% 0.53/0.75       => Y = Z ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  %----Functional: rf2
% 0.53/0.75  fof(axiom_6,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( rf2(X,Y)
% 0.53/0.75          & rf2(X,Z) )
% 0.53/0.75       => Y = Z ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  %----Functional: rf3
% 0.53/0.75  fof(axiom_7,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( ( rf3(X,Y)
% 0.53/0.75          & rf3(X,Z) )
% 0.53/0.75       => Y = Z ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  %----i2003_11_14_17_20_57644
% 0.53/0.75  fof(axiom_8,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(axiom_9,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( rf3(X,Y)
% 0.53/0.75       => rf1(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  fof(axiom_10,axiom,
% 0.53/0.75      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.53/0.75        ( rf3(X,Y)
% 0.53/0.75       => rf2(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.75  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.75  % Proof found
% 0.53/0.75  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.75  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.53/0.75  %ClaNum:43(EqnAxiom:23)
% 0.53/0.75  %VarNum:68(SingletonVarNum:32)
% 0.53/0.75  %MaxLitNum:7
% 0.53/0.75  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.53/0.75  %SharedTerms:2
% 0.53/0.75  [24]P1(a1)
% 0.53/0.75  [25]~P2(x251)
% 0.53/0.75  [26]P11(x261)+P3(x261)
% 0.53/0.75  [27]~P11(x271)+~P3(x271)
% 0.53/0.75  [28]~P1(x281)+P4(f2(x281))
% 0.53/0.75  [29]~P1(x291)+P5(f4(x291))
% 0.53/0.75  [30]~P1(x301)+P6(f3(x301))
% 0.53/0.75  [31]P4(x311)+P7(x311,f5(x311))
% 0.53/0.75  [33]~P5(x331)+P7(x331,f6(x331))
% 0.53/0.75  [34]~P1(x341)+P8(x341,f2(x341))
% 0.53/0.75  [35]~P1(x351)+P9(x351,f4(x351))
% 0.53/0.75  [36]~P1(x361)+P10(x361,f3(x361))
% 0.53/0.75  [32]P5(x321)+~P7(x321,x322)
% 0.53/0.75  [37]~P4(x371)+~P7(x371,x372)
% 0.53/0.75  [38]~P10(x381,x382)+P8(x381,x382)
% 0.53/0.75  [39]~P10(x391,x392)+P9(x391,x392)
% 0.53/0.75  [40]~P8(x403,x401)+E(x401,x402)+~P8(x403,x402)
% 0.53/0.75  [41]~P9(x413,x411)+E(x411,x412)+~P9(x413,x412)
% 0.53/0.75  [42]~P10(x423,x421)+E(x421,x422)+~P10(x423,x422)
% 0.53/0.75  [43]~P8(x431,x432)+~P9(x431,x433)+~P10(x431,x434)+P1(x431)+~P4(x432)+~P5(x433)+~P6(x434)
% 0.53/0.75  %EqnAxiom
% 0.53/0.75  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.53/0.75  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.53/0.75  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.53/0.75  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 0.53/0.75  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f4(x51),f4(x52))
% 0.53/0.75  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61),f3(x62))
% 0.53/0.75  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x71),f5(x72))
% 0.53/0.75  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f6(x81),f6(x82))
% 0.53/0.75  [9]~P1(x91)+P1(x92)+~E(x91,x92)
% 0.53/0.75  [10]~P2(x101)+P2(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 0.53/0.75  [11]~P3(x111)+P3(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 0.53/0.75  [12]~P11(x121)+P11(x122)+~E(x121,x122)
% 0.53/0.75  [13]P10(x132,x133)+~E(x131,x132)+~P10(x131,x133)
% 0.53/0.75  [14]P10(x143,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P10(x143,x141)
% 0.53/0.75  [15]P9(x152,x153)+~E(x151,x152)+~P9(x151,x153)
% 0.53/0.75  [16]P9(x163,x162)+~E(x161,x162)+~P9(x163,x161)
% 0.53/0.75  [17]~P4(x171)+P4(x172)+~E(x171,x172)
% 0.53/0.75  [18]P8(x182,x183)+~E(x181,x182)+~P8(x181,x183)
% 0.53/0.75  [19]P8(x193,x192)+~E(x191,x192)+~P8(x193,x191)
% 0.53/0.75  [20]~P5(x201)+P5(x202)+~E(x201,x202)
% 0.53/0.75  [21]P7(x212,x213)+~E(x211,x212)+~P7(x211,x213)
% 0.53/0.75  [22]P7(x223,x222)+~E(x221,x222)+~P7(x223,x221)
% 0.53/0.75  [23]~P6(x231)+P6(x232)+~E(x231,x232)
% 0.53/0.75  
% 0.53/0.75  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.75  cnf(45,plain,
% 0.53/0.75     (~E(a1,x451)+P4(f2(x451))),
% 0.53/0.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,28,9])).
% 0.53/0.75  cnf(46,plain,
% 0.53/0.75     (P4(f2(a1))),
% 0.53/0.75     inference(equality_inference,[],[45])).
% 0.53/0.75  cnf(49,plain,
% 0.53/0.75     (~P5(f2(a1))),
% 0.53/0.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,37,33])).
% 0.53/0.75  cnf(51,plain,
% 0.53/0.75     (~E(a1,x511)+P5(f4(x511))),
% 0.53/0.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,29,9])).
% 0.53/0.75  cnf(52,plain,
% 0.53/0.75     (P5(f4(a1))),
% 0.53/0.75     inference(equality_inference,[],[51])).
% 0.53/0.75  cnf(61,plain,
% 0.53/0.75     (~E(a1,x611)+P8(x611,f2(x611))),
% 0.53/0.75     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,34,9])).
% 0.53/0.75  cnf(62,plain,
% 0.53/0.75     (P8(a1,f2(a1))),
% 0.53/0.75     inference(equality_inference,[],[61])).
% 0.53/0.75  cnf(67,plain,
% 0.53/0.75     (~E(a1,x671)+P9(x671,f4(x671))),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,35,9])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(68,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (P9(a1,f4(a1))),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(equality_inference,[],[67])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(73,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (~E(a1,x731)+P10(x731,f3(x731))),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,36,9])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(74,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (P10(a1,f3(a1))),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(equality_inference,[],[73])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(79,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (P8(x791,f3(a1))+~E(a1,x791)),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[74,38,18])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(80,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (P8(a1,f3(a1))),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(equality_inference,[],[79])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(82,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (E(f2(a1),x821)+~E(f3(a1),x821)),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[62,80,19,40])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(84,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (~E(f3(a1),x841)+P4(x841)),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[62,46,80,19,40,9,11,12,17])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(87,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (E(f2(a1),f3(a1))),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(equality_inference,[],[82])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(88,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (P4(f3(a1))),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(equality_inference,[],[84])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(89,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (P9(x891,f3(a1))+~E(a1,x891)),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[74,39,15])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(90,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (P9(a1,f3(a1))),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(equality_inference,[],[89])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(94,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (~P5(f3(a1))),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[49,87,88,2,37,20])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(95,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (P9(a1,f2(a1))),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[49,87,88,90,2,37,20,16])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(120,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     (E(f4(a1),f3(a1))),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[87,95,68,3,41])).
% 0.53/0.76  cnf(124,plain,
% 0.53/0.76     ($false),
% 0.53/0.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[87,88,94,52,120,2,3,17,20]),
% 0.53/0.76     ['proof']).
% 0.53/0.76  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.53/0.76  % Total time :0.110000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------