↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : KRS107+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:01:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  119 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  138 (  59   ~;  53   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   69 (   2 sgn  33   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_7,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X7] :
      ( ( rrx(X4,X7)
        & rrx(X4,X5) )
     => X5 = X7 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_7) ).

fof(axiom_17,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( rrx4(X4,X5)
     => rrx(X4,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_17) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
    <=> ( ca_Cx1(X4)
        & ? [X5] :
            ( cc2(X5)
            & rrx4(X4,X5) )
        & ? [X5] :
            ( cc1(X5)
            & rrx3(X4,X5) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_6,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ca_Cx1xcomp(X4)
    <=> ~ ? [X5] : ra_Px1(X4,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).

fof(axiom_4,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ca_Cx1(X4)
    <=> ? [X6] : ra_Px1(X4,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

fof(axiom_20,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( rrx3(X4,X5)
     => rrx(X4,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_20) ).

fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ca_Ax2(X4)
    <=> ( cc1(X4)
        & cc2(X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(axiom_5,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ca_Cx1xcomp(X4)
    <=> ? [X5] :
          ( ca_Ax2(X5)
          & rrx3(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

fof(axiom_12,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_12) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X115,X116,X117] :
      ( X116 = X117
      | ~ rrx(X115,X117)
      | ~ rrx(X115,X116) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X138,X139] :
      ( rrx(X138,X139)
      | ~ rrx4(X138,X139) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_17])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ rrx(X1,X3)
    | ~ rrx(X1,X2)
    | X2 = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ rrx4(X1,X2)
    | rrx(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X96,X99,X100,X101] :
      ( ( cUnsatisfiable(X99)
        | ~ ca_Cx1(X99)
        | ~ cc2(X101)
        | ~ rrx4(X99,X101)
        | ~ cc1(X100)
        | ~ rrx3(X99,X100) )
      & ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X96)
        | ca_Cx1(X96) )
      & ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X96)
        | cc2(esk2_1(X96)) )
      & ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X96)
        | rrx4(X96,esk2_1(X96)) )
      & ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X96)
        | cc1(esk1_1(X96)) )
      & ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X96)
        | rrx3(X96,esk1_1(X96)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X111,X112,X113] :
      ( ( ca_Cx1xcomp(X113)
        | ra_Px1(X113,esk5_1(X113)) )
      & ( ~ ra_Px1(X111,X112)
        | ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(X111) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_6])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X103,X105,X106] :
      ( ( ca_Cx1(X105)
        | ~ ra_Px1(X105,X106) )
      & ( ra_Px1(X103,esk3_1(X103))
        | ~ ca_Cx1(X103) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_4])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ rrx(X3,X1)
    | ~ rrx4(X3,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    | rrx4(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X144,X145] :
      ( rrx(X144,X145)
      | ~ rrx3(X144,X145) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_20])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2)
    | ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Cx1(X1)
    | ra_Px1(X1,esk3_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X102] :
      ( ( ca_Ax2(X102)
        | ~ cc1(X102)
        | ~ cc2(X102) )
      & ( ~ ca_Ax2(X102)
        | cc1(X102) )
      & ( ~ ca_Ax2(X102)
        | cc2(X102) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
    | ~ rrx(X2,X1)
    | X1 = esk2_1(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ rrx3(X1,X2)
    | rrx(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X107,X109,X110] :
      ( ( ca_Cx1xcomp(X109)
        | ~ ca_Ax2(X110)
        | ~ rrx3(X109,X110) )
      & ( ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(X107)
        | ca_Ax2(esk4_1(X107)) )
      & ( ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(X107)
        | rrx3(X107,esk4_1(X107)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Cx1(X1)
    | ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    | ca_Cx1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ cc1(X1)
    | ~ cc2(X1)
    | ca_Ax2(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    | cc2(esk2_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
    | ~ rrx3(X2,X1)
    | X1 = esk2_1(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    | rrx3(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Ax2(X2)
    | ~ rrx3(X1,X2)
    | ca_Cx1xcomp(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    | ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    | ~ cc1(esk2_1(X1))
    | ca_Ax2(esk2_1(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    | esk2_1(X1) = esk1_1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    | cc1(esk1_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    | ~ ca_Ax2(esk1_1(X1)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_30]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KRS107+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:56:35 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 1884955 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.44  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1884970 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.44  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 53
% 0.10/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 66
% 0.10/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 33
% 0.10/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 33
% 0.10/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 56
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.10/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 52
% 0.10/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 16
% 0.10/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 42
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 32
% 0.10/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.10/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 41
% 0.10/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 35
% 0.10/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.10/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 33
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.10/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 27
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 18
% 0.10/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 218
% 0.10/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 161
% 0.10/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.10/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.10/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 5011
% 0.10/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1069
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.44  % User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.10/0.44  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3656 pages
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.44  % User time                : 0.029 s
% 0.10/0.44  % System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Total time               : 0.043 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.10/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------