↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KRS107+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:46:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  133 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  142 (  58   ~;  49   |;  26   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   1 sgn  35   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cc2_substitution_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( cc2(A)
        & A = B )
     => cc2(B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cc2_substitution_1) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
    <=> ( ca_Cx1(X)
        & ? [Y] :
            ( cc2(Y)
            & rrx4(X,Y) )
        & ? [Y] :
            ( cc1(Y)
            & rrx3(X,Y) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ca_Ax2(X)
    <=> ( cc1(X)
        & cc2(X) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(axiom_4,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ca_Cx1(X)
    <=> ? [Y0] : ra_Px1(X,Y0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

fof(axiom_5,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ca_Cx1xcomp(X)
    <=> ? [Y] :
          ( ca_Ax2(Y)
          & rrx3(X,Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

fof(axiom_6,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ca_Cx1xcomp(X)
    <=> ~ ? [Y] : ra_Px1(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).

fof(axiom_7,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( rrx(X,Z)
        & rrx(X,Y) )
     => Y = Z ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_7) ).

fof(axiom_17,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( rrx4(X,Y)
     => rrx(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_17) ).

fof(axiom_20,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( rrx3(X,Y)
     => rrx(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_20) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( cc2(A)
    | ~ cc2(B)
    | A != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cc2_substitution_1]) ).

fof(nnf_35,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ~ ca_Cx1(X)
        | ! [Y] :
            ( ~ cc2(Y)
            | ~ rrx4(X,Y) )
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ cc1(X2)
            | ~ rrx3(X,X2) )
        | cUnsatisfiable(X) )
      & ( ( ca_Cx1(X)
          & ? [X1] :
              ( cc2(X1)
              & rrx4(X,X1) )
          & ? [X0] :
              ( cc1(X0)
              & rrx3(X,X0) ) )
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_2_sk,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ~ ca_Cx1(X)
        | ! [Y] :
            ( ~ cc2(Y)
            | ~ rrx4(X,Y) )
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ cc1(X2)
            | ~ rrx3(X,X2) )
        | cUnsatisfiable(X) )
      & ( ( ca_Cx1(X)
          & cc2(sK1(X))
          & rrx4(X,sK1(X))
          & cc1(sK0(X))
          & rrx3(X,sK0(X)) )
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0(X)),skolemize(X1,sK1(X))],[nnf_35]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_2,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( ~ ca_Cx1(VAR_0)
        | ~ cc2(VAR_2)
        | ~ rrx4(VAR_0,VAR_2)
        | ~ cc1(VAR_1)
        | ~ rrx3(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ca_Cx1(VAR_0)
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( cc2(sK1(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( rrx4(VAR_0,sK1(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( cc1(sK0(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( rrx3(VAR_0,sK0(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2_sk]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    ( rrx3(A,sK0(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_90,plain,
    ( cc1(sK0(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_91,plain,
    ( rrx4(A,sK1(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_92,plain,
    ( cc2(sK1(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_93,plain,
    ( ca_Cx1(A)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_97,plain,
    ( ~ cc1(A)
    | ~ cc2(A)
    | ca_Ax2(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_3]) ).

fof(nnf_37,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ! [Y0] : ~ ra_Px1(X,Y0)
        | ca_Cx1(X) )
      & ( ? [X2] : ra_Px1(X,X2)
        | ~ ca_Cx1(X) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_4]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_4_sk,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ! [Y0] : ~ ra_Px1(X,Y0)
        | ca_Cx1(X) )
      & ( ra_Px1(X,sK2(X))
        | ~ ca_Cx1(X) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(X2,sK2(X))],[nnf_37]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_4,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ ra_Px1(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ca_Cx1(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ra_Px1(VAR_0,sK2(VAR_0))
        | ~ ca_Cx1(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_4_sk]) ).

cnf(c_98,plain,
    ( ra_Px1(A,sK2(A))
    | ~ ca_Cx1(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_4]) ).

cnf(c_102,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Ax2(B)
    | ~ rrx3(A,B)
    | ca_Cx1xcomp(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_5]) ).

cnf(c_103,plain,
    ( ~ ra_Px1(A,B)
    | ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_6]) ).

cnf(c_105,plain,
    ( C = B
    | ~ rrx(A,C)
    | ~ rrx(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_7]) ).

fof(axiom_12,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_12) ).

cnf(c_110,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_12]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    ( rrx(A,B)
    | ~ rrx4(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_17]) ).

cnf(c_118,plain,
    ( rrx(A,B)
    | ~ rrx3(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_20]) ).

cnf(c_123,plain,
    ca_Cx1(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_93]) ).

cnf(c_124,plain,
    cc2(sK1(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_92]) ).

cnf(c_125,plain,
    rrx4(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226,sK1(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_91]) ).

cnf(c_126,plain,
    cc1(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_90]) ).

cnf(c_127,plain,
    rrx3(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226,sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_89]) ).

cnf(c_129,plain,
    ra_Px1(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226,sK2(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_123,c_98]) ).

cnf(c_137,plain,
    rrx(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226,sK1(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_125,c_115]) ).

cnf(c_142,plain,
    rrx(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226,sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_127,c_118]) ).

cnf(c_145,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Ax2(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226))
    | ca_Cx1xcomp(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_127,c_102]) ).

cnf(c_148,plain,
    ~ ca_Cx1xcomp(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_103]) ).

cnf(c_151,plain,
    ~ ca_Ax2(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_148,c_145]) ).

cnf(c_160,plain,
    ( ~ cc1(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226))
    | ~ cc2(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_151]) ).

cnf(c_155,plain,
    ~ cc2(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_126]) ).

cnf(c_161,plain,
    ( cc2(A)
    | A != sK1(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_124]) ).

cnf(c_162,plain,
    sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226) != sK1(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_161,c_155]) ).

cnf(c_156,plain,
    sK1(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226) != sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_162]) ).

cnf(c_163,plain,
    ( sK1(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226) = A
    | ~ rrx(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_137]) ).

cnf(c_164,plain,
    ~ rrx(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226,sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_01226)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_163,c_156]) ).

cnf(c_159,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_142,c_164]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KRS107+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:39:44 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.35  % Process 2369200 was started by sandbox2 on n009,
% 0.09/0.35  % Fri Sep 25 19:39:44 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.36  
% 0.09/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.37  
% 0.09/0.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.37  
% 0.09/0.37  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.09/0.37  % Length of proof is 37.
% 0.09/0.37  % Level of proof is 8.
% 0.09/0.37  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.09/0.37  % Given clauses 79.
% 0.09/0.37  
% 0.09/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------