↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : KRS108+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:55:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.66s 2.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  37 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   69 (   4 equ;  38 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_99,plain,
    ( rr(X1,X2)
    | ~ rinvR(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5grk54fy/input.p',i_0_99) ).

cnf(i_0_47,plain,
    ( rinvR(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5grk54fy/input.p',i_0_47) ).

cnf(i_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ cp2xcomp(X1)
    | ~ ra_Px5(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5grk54fy/input.p',i_0_53) ).

cnf(i_0_50,plain,
    ( ra_Px5(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cp2(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5grk54fy/input.p',i_0_50) ).

cnf(i_0_100,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5grk54fy/input.p',i_0_100) ).

cnf(i_0_46,plain,
    ( ca_Ax14(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5grk54fy/input.p',i_0_46) ).

cnf(i_0_78,plain,
    ( cp2xcomp(X1)
    | ~ ca_Cx1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5grk54fy/input.p',i_0_78) ).

cnf(i_0_48,plain,
    ( ca_Cx1(X1)
    | ~ cp1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5grk54fy/input.p',i_0_48) ).

cnf(i_0_72,plain,
    ( cp1(esk10_1(X1))
    | ~ ca_Ax14(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5grk54fy/input.p',i_0_72) ).

cnf(i_0_71,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ ca_Ax14(X3)
    | ~ rr(X3,X2)
    | ~ rr(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5grk54fy/input.p',i_0_71) ).

cnf(i_0_73,plain,
    ( rr(X1,esk10_1(X1))
    | ~ ca_Ax14(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5grk54fy/input.p',i_0_73) ).

cnf(i_0_45,plain,
    ( cp2(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5grk54fy/input.p',i_0_45) ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    ( rr(X1,X2)
    | ~ rinvR(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_99 ).

cnf(c_0_114,plain,
    ( rinvR(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    i_0_47 ).

cnf(c_0_115,plain,
    ( ~ cp2xcomp(X1)
    | ~ ra_Px5(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    ( ra_Px5(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cp2(X1) ),
    i_0_50 ).

cnf(c_0_117,plain,
    ( rr(esk1_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_114]) ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740),
    i_0_100 ).

cnf(c_0_119,plain,
    ( ca_Ax14(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    i_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    ( ~ cp2xcomp(X1)
    | ~ cp2(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_116]) ).

cnf(c_0_121,plain,
    ( cp2xcomp(X1)
    | ~ ca_Cx1(X1) ),
    i_0_78 ).

cnf(c_0_122,plain,
    ( ca_Cx1(X1)
    | ~ cp1(X1) ),
    i_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_123,plain,
    ( cp1(esk10_1(X1))
    | ~ ca_Ax14(X1) ),
    i_0_72 ).

cnf(c_0_124,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ ca_Ax14(X3)
    | ~ rr(X3,X2)
    | ~ rr(X3,X1) ),
    i_0_71 ).

cnf(c_0_125,plain,
    rr(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740),i2003_11_14_17_21_04740),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_118]) ).

cnf(c_0_126,plain,
    ca_Ax14(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_119,c_0_118]) ).

cnf(c_0_127,plain,
    ( rr(X1,esk10_1(X1))
    | ~ ca_Ax14(X1) ),
    i_0_73 ).

cnf(c_0_128,plain,
    ( ~ cp2(X1)
    | ~ ca_Cx1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_121]) ).

cnf(c_0_129,plain,
    ( cp2(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    i_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_130,plain,
    ( ca_Cx1(esk10_1(X1))
    | ~ ca_Ax14(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_123]) ).

cnf(c_0_131,plain,
    ( X1 = i2003_11_14_17_21_04740
    | ~ rr(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740),X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_124,c_0_125]),c_0_126])]) ).

cnf(c_0_132,plain,
    rr(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740),esk10_1(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_127,c_0_126]) ).

cnf(c_0_133,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Cx1(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_128,c_0_129]) ).

cnf(c_0_134,plain,
    ca_Cx1(esk10_1(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_130,c_0_126]) ).

cnf(c_0_135,plain,
    esk10_1(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740)) = i2003_11_14_17_21_04740,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_131,c_0_132]) ).

cnf(c_0_136,plain,
    ~ ca_Cx1(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_133,c_0_118]) ).

cnf(c_0_137,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_134,c_0_135]),c_0_136]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : KRS108+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 12:19:53 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 6.66/2.16  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 6.66/2.16  # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.66/2.16  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.66/2.16  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA
% 6.66/2.16  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 6.66/2.16  #
% 6.66/2.16  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 6.66/2.16  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 6.66/2.16  
% 6.66/2.16  # Proof found!
% 6.66/2.16  # SZS status Theorem
% 6.66/2.16  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.66/2.16  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.66/2.16  
% 6.66/2.16  # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.66/2.16  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 6.66/2.16  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 6.66/2.16  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 6.66/2.16  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 6.66/2.16  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------