%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : KRS108+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:54:10 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.69s 1.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 16
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 80 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 277 ( 24 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 337 ( 140 ~; 127 |; 59 &)
% ( 9 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 14 ( 12 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 142 ( 0 sgn 120 !; 22 ?; 46 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f42,axiom,
! [X0] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X0)
<=> ( cp2(X0)
& ? [X1] :
( ca_Ax14(X1)
& rinvR(X0,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).
fof(f43,axiom,
! [X0] :
( cp1(X0)
=> ca_Cx1(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).
fof(f44,axiom,
! [X0] :
( cp2(X0)
<=> ? [X1] : ra_Px5(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).
fof(f46,axiom,
! [X0] :
( cp2xcomp(X0)
<=> ~ ? [X1] : ra_Px5(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).
fof(f55,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ca_Ax14(X0)
<=> ( ! [X2,X3] :
( ( rr(X0,X3)
& rr(X0,X2) )
=> X2 = X3 )
& ? [X1] :
( cp1(X1)
& rr(X0,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_15) ).
fof(f56,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ca_Cx1(X0)
<=> ( cp4xcomp(X0)
& cp3xcomp(X0)
& cp5xcomp(X0)
& cp2xcomp(X0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_16) ).
fof(f65,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( rinvR(X0,X1)
<=> rr(X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_25) ).
fof(f66,axiom,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_26) ).
fof(f145,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ cp1(X0)
| ca_Cx1(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).
fof(f147,plain,
! [X0] :
( cp2xcomp(X0)
<=> ! [X1] : ~ ra_Px5(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).
fof(f153,plain,
! [X0] :
( ca_Ax14(X0)
<=> ( ! [X2,X3] :
( ~ rr(X0,X3)
| ~ rr(X0,X2)
| X2 = X3 )
& ? [X1] :
( cp1(X1)
& rr(X0,X1) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).
fof(f154,plain,
! [X0] :
( ca_Ax14(X0)
<=> ( ! [X2,X3] :
( ~ rr(X0,X3)
| ~ rr(X0,X2)
| X2 = X3 )
& ? [X1] :
( cp1(X1)
& rr(X0,X1) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f153]) ).
fof(f159,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0)
| ( cp2(X0)
& ? [X1] :
( ca_Ax14(X1)
& rinvR(X0,X1) ) ) )
& ( ~ cp2(X0)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ ca_Ax14(X1)
| ~ rinvR(X0,X1) )
| cUnsatisfiable(X0) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).
fof(f160,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0)
| ( cp2(X0)
& ? [X1] :
( ca_Ax14(X1)
& rinvR(X0,X1) ) ) )
& ( ~ cp2(X0)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ ca_Ax14(X1)
| ~ rinvR(X0,X1) )
| cUnsatisfiable(X0) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f159]) ).
fof(f161,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0)
| ( cp2(X0)
& ? [X2] :
( ca_Ax14(X2)
& rinvR(X0,X2) ) ) )
& ( ~ cp2(X0)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ ca_Ax14(X1)
| ~ rinvR(X0,X1) )
| cUnsatisfiable(X0) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f160]) ).
fof(f162,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0)
| ( cp2(X0)
& ca_Ax14(sK0(X0))
& rinvR(X0,sK0(X0)) ) )
& ( ~ cp2(X0)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ ca_Ax14(X1)
| ~ rinvR(X0,X1) )
| cUnsatisfiable(X0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X0))],[f161]) ).
fof(f163,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ cp2(X0)
| ? [X1] : ra_Px5(X0,X1) )
& ( ! [X1] : ~ ra_Px5(X0,X1)
| cp2(X0) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).
fof(f164,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ cp2(X0)
| ? [X2] : ra_Px5(X0,X2) )
& ( ! [X1] : ~ ra_Px5(X0,X1)
| cp2(X0) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f163]) ).
fof(f165,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ cp2(X0)
| ra_Px5(X0,sK1(X0)) )
& ( ! [X1] : ~ ra_Px5(X0,X1)
| cp2(X0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(X2,sK1(X0))],[f164]) ).
fof(f166,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ cp2xcomp(X0)
| ! [X1] : ~ ra_Px5(X0,X1) )
& ( ? [X1] : ra_Px5(X0,X1)
| cp2xcomp(X0) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f147]) ).
fof(f167,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ cp2xcomp(X0)
| ! [X2] : ~ ra_Px5(X0,X2) )
& ( ? [X1] : ra_Px5(X0,X1)
| cp2xcomp(X0) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f166]) ).
fof(f168,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ cp2xcomp(X0)
| ! [X2] : ~ ra_Px5(X0,X2) )
& ( ra_Px5(X0,sK2(X0))
| cp2xcomp(X0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(X1,sK2(X0))],[f167]) ).
fof(f187,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ ca_Ax14(X0)
| ( ! [X2,X3] :
( ~ rr(X0,X3)
| ~ rr(X0,X2)
| X2 = X3 )
& ? [X1] :
( cp1(X1)
& rr(X0,X1) ) ) )
& ( ? [X2,X3] :
( rr(X0,X3)
& rr(X0,X2)
& X2 != X3 )
| ! [X1] :
( ~ cp1(X1)
| ~ rr(X0,X1) )
| ca_Ax14(X0) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f154]) ).
fof(f188,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ ca_Ax14(X0)
| ( ! [X2,X3] :
( ~ rr(X0,X3)
| ~ rr(X0,X2)
| X2 = X3 )
& ? [X1] :
( cp1(X1)
& rr(X0,X1) ) ) )
& ( ? [X2,X3] :
( rr(X0,X3)
& rr(X0,X2)
& X2 != X3 )
| ! [X1] :
( ~ cp1(X1)
| ~ rr(X0,X1) )
| ca_Ax14(X0) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f187]) ).
fof(f189,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ ca_Ax14(X0)
| ( ! [X5,X6] :
( ~ rr(X0,X6)
| ~ rr(X0,X5)
| X5 = X6 )
& ? [X4] :
( cp1(X4)
& rr(X0,X4) ) ) )
& ( ? [X2,X3] :
( rr(X0,X3)
& rr(X0,X2)
& X2 != X3 )
| ! [X1] :
( ~ cp1(X1)
| ~ rr(X0,X1) )
| ca_Ax14(X0) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f188]) ).
fof(f190,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ ca_Ax14(X0)
| ( ! [X5,X6] :
( ~ rr(X0,X6)
| ~ rr(X0,X5)
| X5 = X6 )
& cp1(sK11(X0))
& rr(X0,sK11(X0)) ) )
& ( ( rr(X0,sK10(X0))
& rr(X0,sK9(X0))
& sK9(X0) != sK10(X0) )
| ! [X1] :
( ~ cp1(X1)
| ~ rr(X0,X1) )
| ca_Ax14(X0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK9,sK10,sK11]),skolemize(X2,sK9(X0)),skolemize(X3,sK10(X0)),skolemize(X4,sK11(X0))],[f189]) ).
fof(f191,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ ca_Cx1(X0)
| ( cp4xcomp(X0)
& cp3xcomp(X0)
& cp5xcomp(X0)
& cp2xcomp(X0) ) )
& ( ~ cp4xcomp(X0)
| ~ cp3xcomp(X0)
| ~ cp5xcomp(X0)
| ~ cp2xcomp(X0)
| ca_Cx1(X0) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).
fof(f192,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ ca_Cx1(X0)
| ( cp4xcomp(X0)
& cp3xcomp(X0)
& cp5xcomp(X0)
& cp2xcomp(X0) ) )
& ( ~ cp4xcomp(X0)
| ~ cp3xcomp(X0)
| ~ cp5xcomp(X0)
| ~ cp2xcomp(X0)
| ca_Cx1(X0) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f191]) ).
fof(f215,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ rinvR(X0,X1)
| rr(X1,X0) )
& ( ~ rr(X1,X0)
| rinvR(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).
fof(f259,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0)
| cp2(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).
fof(f260,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0)
| ca_Ax14(sK0(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).
fof(f261,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0)
| rinvR(X0,sK0(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).
fof(f263,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ cp1(X0)
| ca_Cx1(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f145]) ).
fof(f264,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ cp2(X0)
| ra_Px5(X0,sK1(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f165]) ).
fof(f267,plain,
! [X2,X0] :
( ~ cp2xcomp(X0)
| ~ ra_Px5(X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f168]) ).
fof(f283,plain,
! [X0,X6,X5] :
( ~ ca_Ax14(X0)
| ~ rr(X0,X6)
| ~ rr(X0,X5)
| X5 = X6 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f190]) ).
fof(f284,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ ca_Ax14(X0)
| cp1(sK11(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f190]) ).
fof(f285,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ ca_Ax14(X0)
| rr(X0,sK11(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f190]) ).
fof(f292,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ ca_Cx1(X0)
| cp2xcomp(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f192]) ).
fof(f313,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ rinvR(X0,X1)
| rr(X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f215]) ).
fof(f315,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).
tcf(c_54,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( rinvR(X0,sK0(X0))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f261]) ).
tcf(c_55,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ca_Ax14(sK0(X0))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f260]) ).
tcf(c_56,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( cp2(X0)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f259]) ).
tcf(c_57,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ca_Cx1(X0)
| ~ cp1(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f263]) ).
tcf(c_59,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ra_Px5(X0,sK1(X0))
| ~ cp2(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f264]) ).
tcf(c_62,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ cp2xcomp(X0)
| ~ ra_Px5(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f267]) ).
tcf(c_80,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( rr(X0,sK11(X0))
| ~ ca_Ax14(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f285]) ).
tcf(c_81,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( cp1(sK11(X0))
| ~ ca_Ax14(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f284]) ).
tcf(c_82,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
| ~ ca_Ax14(X0)
| ~ rr(X0,X2)
| ~ rr(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f283]) ).
tcf(c_84,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( cp2xcomp(X0)
| ~ ca_Cx1(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f292]) ).
tcf(c_108,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( rr(X1,X0)
| ~ rinvR(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f313]) ).
tcf(c_109,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f315]) ).
tcf(c_142,plain,
( ca_Ax14(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).
tcf(c_173,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( cp2(X0)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).
tcf(c_175,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( rinvR(X0,sK0(X0))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).
tcf(c_179,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( rr(X1,X0)
| ~ rinvR(X0,X1) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_108]) ).
tcf(c_181,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ra_Px5(X0,sK1(X0))
| ~ cp2(X0) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_59]) ).
tcf(c_189,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( cp2xcomp(X0)
| ~ ca_Cx1(X0) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_84]) ).
tcf(c_199,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ca_Cx1(X0)
| ~ cp1(X0) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).
tcf(c_203,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ cp2xcomp(X0)
| ~ ra_Px5(X0,X1) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).
tcf(c_285,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( cp1(sK11(X0))
| ~ ca_Ax14(X0) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_81]) ).
tcf(c_1078,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ cp2xcomp(X0)
| ~ cp2(X1)
| ( X0 != X1 )
| ( sK1(X1) != X2 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_203,c_181]) ).
tcf(c_1079,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ cp2xcomp(X0)
| ~ cp2(X0) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_1078]) ).
tcf(c_1182,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( rr(X2,X0)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| ( X0 != X1 )
| ( sK0(X1) != X2 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_179,c_175]) ).
tcf(c_1183,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( rr(sK0(X0),X0)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_1182]) ).
tcf(c_1215,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ca_Cx1(X1)
| ~ ca_Ax14(X0)
| ( sK11(X0) != X1 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_199,c_285]) ).
tcf(c_1216,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ca_Cx1(sK11(X0))
| ~ ca_Ax14(X0) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_1215]) ).
tcf(c_1300,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ca_Cx1(X0)
| ~ cp2(X1)
| ( X0 != X1 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_189,c_1079]) ).
tcf(c_1301,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ca_Cx1(X0)
| ~ cp2(X0) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_1300]) ).
tcf(c_1687,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ca_Cx1(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0)
| ( X0 != X1 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_173,c_1301]) ).
tcf(c_1688,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ca_Cx1(X0)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_1687]) ).
tcf(c_3305,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( sK11(X0) = X1 )
| ~ ca_Ax14(X0)
| ~ rr(X0,X1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_82]) ).
tcf(c_3314,plain,
~ ca_Cx1(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_1688]) ).
tcf(c_3361,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( sK11(sK0(X0)) = X0 )
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0)
| ~ ca_Ax14(sK0(X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1183,c_3305]) ).
tcf(c_3366,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( sK11(sK0(X0)) = X0 )
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X0) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3361,c_55,c_3361]) ).
tcf(c_3373,plain,
sK11(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740)) = i2003_11_14_17_21_04740,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_3366]) ).
tcf(c_3376,plain,
( ca_Cx1(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740)
| ~ ca_Ax14(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3373,c_1216]) ).
tcf(c_3377,plain,
~ ca_Ax14(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_04740)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3376,c_3314]) ).
tcf(c_3378,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_3377,c_142,c_109]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS108+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.58 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.58 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.58 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.58 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.58 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.58 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.58 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.58 % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 19:30:36 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.59 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.59 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.62 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.62 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.64
% 0.15/0.64 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/0.64
% 0.15/0.64 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/0.65 % Proving...
% 0.69/1.29 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.69/1.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % ------ iProver source info
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.69/1.29 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.69/1.29 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % ------ Parsing...
% 0.69/1.29 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 5 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 19 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 8 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.69/1.29 % ------ Proving...
% 0.69/1.29 % ------ Problem Properties
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 %
% 0.69/1.29 % clauses 19
% 0.69/1.29 % conjectures 0
% 0.69/1.29 % EPR 8
% 0.69/1.29 % Horn 15
% 0.69/1.29 % unary 1
% 0.69/1.29 % binary 13
% 0.69/1.29 % lits 48
% 0.69/1.29 % lits eq 2
% 0.69/1.29 % fd_pure 0
% 0.69/1.29 % fd_pseudo 0
% 0.69/1.29 % fd_cond 0
% 0.69/1.29 % fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 0.69/1.29 % AC symbols 0
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % ------
% 0.69/1.29 % Current options:
% 0.69/1.29 % ------
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 %
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % ------ Proving...
% 0.69/1.29 %
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.69/1.29
% 0.69/1.29
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------