↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : KRS109+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:32 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.71s 0.79s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.14  % Problem    : KRS109+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.10/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 13:43:39 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.59  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.71/0.78  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.78  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.71/0.78  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.71/0.78  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.71/0.78  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.71/0.78  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.71/0.78  
% 0.71/0.78  % Result      :Theorem 0.140000s
% 0.71/0.78  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.140000s
% 0.71/0.78  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.78  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.78  % File     : KRS109+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.71/0.78  % Domain   : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web)
% 0.71/0.78  % Problem  : DL Test: t10.2
% 0.71/0.78  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.71/0.78  % English  :
% 0.71/0.78  
% 0.71/0.78  % Refs     : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.71/0.78  %          : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW
% 0.71/0.78  % Source   : [Bec03]
% 0.71/0.78  % Names    : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest610 [Bec03]
% 0.71/0.78  
% 0.71/0.78  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.71/0.78  % Rating   : 0.00 v3.1.0
% 0.71/0.78  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (   1 unt;   0 def)
% 0.71/0.78  %            Number of atoms       :  109 (  26 equ)
% 0.71/0.78  %            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
% 0.71/0.78  %            Number of connectives :   73 (   3   ~;   0   |;  31   &)
% 0.71/0.78  %                                         (   9 <=>;  30  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.71/0.78  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   5 avg)
% 0.71/0.78  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.71/0.78  %            Number of predicates  :   17 (  16 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.71/0.78  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.71/0.78  %            Number of variables   :   92 (  88   !;   4   ?)
% 0.71/0.78  % SPC      : FOF_UNS_RFO_SEQ
% 0.71/0.78  
% 0.71/0.78  % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of
% 0.71/0.78  %            datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's
% 0.71/0.78  %            still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL.
% 0.71/0.78  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.78  fof(cUnsatisfiable_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.78      ! [A,B] :
% 0.71/0.78        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.78          & cUnsatisfiable(A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => cUnsatisfiable(B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(ca_Ax2_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & ca_Ax2(A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => ca_Ax2(B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(ca_Vx3_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & ca_Vx3(A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => ca_Vx3(B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(cowlNothing_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & cowlNothing(A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => cowlNothing(B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(cowlThing_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & cowlThing(A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => cowlThing(B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(cp_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & cp(A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => cp(B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(cpxcomp_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & cpxcomp(A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => cpxcomp(B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(ra_Px1_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & ra_Px1(A,C) )
% 0.71/0.79       => ra_Px1(B,C) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(ra_Px1_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & ra_Px1(C,A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => ra_Px1(C,B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(rf_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & rf(A,C) )
% 0.71/0.79       => rf(B,C) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(rf_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & rf(C,A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => rf(C,B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(rf1_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & rf1(A,C) )
% 0.71/0.79       => rf1(B,C) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(rf1_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & rf1(C,A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => rf1(C,B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(rinvF_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & rinvF(A,C) )
% 0.71/0.79       => rinvF(B,C) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(rinvF_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & rinvF(C,A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => rinvF(C,B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(rinvF1_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & rinvF1(A,C) )
% 0.71/0.79       => rinvF1(B,C) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(rinvF1_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & rinvF1(C,A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => rinvF1(C,B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(rinvS_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & rinvS(A,C) )
% 0.71/0.79       => rinvS(B,C) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(rinvS_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & rinvS(C,A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => rinvS(C,B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(rs_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & rs(A,C) )
% 0.71/0.79       => rs(B,C) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(rs_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & rs(C,A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => rs(C,B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(xsd_integer_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & xsd_integer(A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => xsd_integer(B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(xsd_string_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [A,B] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( A = B
% 0.71/0.79          & xsd_string(A) )
% 0.71/0.79       => xsd_string(B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_0,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.71/0.79        & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.71/0.79      <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----Equality cUnsatisfiable
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_2,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
% 0.71/0.79      <=> ( cpxcomp(X)
% 0.71/0.79          & ? [Y] :
% 0.71/0.79              ( rf(X,Y)
% 0.71/0.79              & ca_Ax2(Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----Equality cp
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_3,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( cp(X)
% 0.71/0.79      <=> ~ ? [Y] : ra_Px1(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----Equality cpxcomp
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_4,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( cpxcomp(X)
% 0.71/0.79      <=> ? [Y0] : ra_Px1(X,Y0) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----Equality ca_Ax2
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_5,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ca_Ax2(X)
% 0.71/0.79      <=> ( ! [Y] :
% 0.71/0.79              ( rinvS(X,Y)
% 0.71/0.79             => cp(Y) )
% 0.71/0.79          & ! [Y] :
% 0.71/0.79              ( rinvF(X,Y)
% 0.71/0.79             => ca_Vx3(Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----Equality ca_Vx3
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_6,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ca_Vx3(X)
% 0.71/0.79      <=> ? [Y] :
% 0.71/0.79            ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.71/0.79            & cp(Y) ) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----Functional: rf
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_7,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( rf(X,Y)
% 0.71/0.79          & rf(X,Z) )
% 0.71/0.79       => Y = Z ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----Functional: rf1
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_8,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( rf1(X,Y)
% 0.71/0.79          & rf1(X,Z) )
% 0.71/0.79       => Y = Z ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----Inverse: rinvF
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_9,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( rinvF(X,Y)
% 0.71/0.79      <=> rf(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----Inverse: rinvF1
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_10,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( rinvF1(X,Y)
% 0.71/0.79      <=> rf1(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----Inverse: rinvS
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_11,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( rinvS(X,Y)
% 0.71/0.79      <=> rs(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----Functional: rs
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_12,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.71/0.79          & rs(X,Z) )
% 0.71/0.79       => Y = Z ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %----i2003_11_14_17_21_08508
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_13,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_08508) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_14,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.71/0.79       => rf(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  fof(axiom_15,axiom,
% 0.71/0.79      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.71/0.79        ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.71/0.79       => rf1(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.71/0.79  
% 0.71/0.79  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.79  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.79  % Proof found
% 0.71/0.79  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.71/0.79  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.71/0.80  %ClaNum:63(EqnAxiom:31)
% 0.71/0.80  %VarNum:112(SingletonVarNum:51)
% 0.71/0.80  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.71/0.80  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.71/0.80  %SharedTerms:2
% 0.71/0.80  [32]P1(a1)
% 0.71/0.80  [33]~P2(x331)
% 0.71/0.80  [34]P15(x341)+P5(x341)
% 0.71/0.80  [35]~P1(x351)+P6(x351)
% 0.71/0.80  [36]~P15(x361)+~P5(x361)
% 0.71/0.80  [37]~P1(x371)+P3(f2(x371))
% 0.71/0.80  [38]~P4(x381)+P7(f3(x381))
% 0.71/0.80  [39]P7(x391)+P8(x391,f4(x391))
% 0.71/0.80  [41]~P6(x411)+P8(x411,f5(x411))
% 0.71/0.80  [42]~P1(x421)+P9(x421,f2(x421))
% 0.71/0.80  [43]~P4(x431)+P10(x431,f3(x431))
% 0.71/0.80  [40]P6(x401)+~P8(x401,x402)
% 0.71/0.80  [44]~P7(x441)+~P8(x441,x442)
% 0.71/0.80  [48]~P11(x482,x481)+P9(x481,x482)
% 0.71/0.80  [49]~P10(x491,x492)+P9(x491,x492)
% 0.71/0.80  [50]~P14(x502,x501)+P12(x501,x502)
% 0.71/0.80  [51]~P10(x511,x512)+P12(x511,x512)
% 0.71/0.80  [52]~P9(x522,x521)+P11(x521,x522)
% 0.71/0.80  [53]~P12(x532,x531)+P14(x531,x532)
% 0.71/0.80  [54]~P10(x542,x541)+P13(x541,x542)
% 0.71/0.80  [55]~P13(x552,x551)+P10(x551,x552)
% 0.71/0.80  [56]P3(x561)+~P4(f6(x561))+~P7(f7(x561))
% 0.71/0.80  [58]P3(x581)+P11(x581,f6(x581))+~P7(f7(x581))
% 0.71/0.80  [59]P3(x591)+P13(x591,f7(x591))+~P4(f6(x591))
% 0.71/0.80  [60]P3(x601)+P11(x601,f6(x601))+P13(x601,f7(x601))
% 0.71/0.80  [45]~P11(x452,x451)+P4(x451)+~P3(x452)
% 0.71/0.80  [46]~P10(x461,x462)+P4(x461)+~P7(x462)
% 0.71/0.80  [47]~P13(x472,x471)+P7(x471)+~P3(x472)
% 0.71/0.80  [61]~P9(x613,x611)+E(x611,x612)+~P9(x613,x612)
% 0.71/0.80  [62]~P12(x623,x621)+E(x621,x622)+~P12(x623,x622)
% 0.71/0.80  [63]~P10(x633,x631)+E(x631,x632)+~P10(x633,x632)
% 0.71/0.80  [57]~P6(x571)+~P9(x571,x572)+P1(x571)+~P3(x572)
% 0.71/0.80  %EqnAxiom
% 0.71/0.80  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.71/0.80  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.71/0.80  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.71/0.80  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 0.71/0.80  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x51),f3(x52))
% 0.71/0.80  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f4(x61),f4(x62))
% 0.71/0.80  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x71),f5(x72))
% 0.71/0.80  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f7(x81),f7(x82))
% 0.71/0.80  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f6(x91),f6(x92))
% 0.71/0.80  [10]~P1(x101)+P1(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 0.71/0.80  [11]~P2(x111)+P2(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 0.71/0.80  [12]~P5(x121)+P5(x122)+~E(x121,x122)
% 0.71/0.80  [13]~P15(x131)+P15(x132)+~E(x131,x132)
% 0.71/0.80  [14]~P6(x141)+P6(x142)+~E(x141,x142)
% 0.71/0.80  [15]P10(x152,x153)+~E(x151,x152)+~P10(x151,x153)
% 0.71/0.80  [16]P10(x163,x162)+~E(x161,x162)+~P10(x163,x161)
% 0.71/0.80  [17]P9(x172,x173)+~E(x171,x172)+~P9(x171,x173)
% 0.71/0.80  [18]P9(x183,x182)+~E(x181,x182)+~P9(x183,x181)
% 0.71/0.80  [19]~P3(x191)+P3(x192)+~E(x191,x192)
% 0.71/0.80  [20]P13(x202,x203)+~E(x201,x202)+~P13(x201,x203)
% 0.71/0.80  [21]P13(x213,x212)+~E(x211,x212)+~P13(x213,x211)
% 0.71/0.80  [22]~P4(x221)+P4(x222)+~E(x221,x222)
% 0.71/0.80  [23]~P7(x231)+P7(x232)+~E(x231,x232)
% 0.71/0.80  [24]P12(x242,x243)+~E(x241,x242)+~P12(x241,x243)
% 0.71/0.80  [25]P12(x253,x252)+~E(x251,x252)+~P12(x253,x251)
% 0.71/0.80  [26]P14(x262,x263)+~E(x261,x262)+~P14(x261,x263)
% 0.71/0.80  [27]P14(x273,x272)+~E(x271,x272)+~P14(x273,x271)
% 0.71/0.80  [28]P8(x282,x283)+~E(x281,x282)+~P8(x281,x283)
% 0.71/0.80  [29]P8(x293,x292)+~E(x291,x292)+~P8(x293,x291)
% 0.71/0.80  [30]P11(x302,x303)+~E(x301,x302)+~P11(x301,x303)
% 0.71/0.80  [31]P11(x313,x312)+~E(x311,x312)+~P11(x313,x311)
% 0.71/0.80  
% 0.71/0.80  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(65,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (P8(a1,f5(a1))),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[32,35,41])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(70,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (~E(a1,x701)+P3(f2(x701))),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[32,37,10])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(71,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (P3(f2(a1))),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(equality_inference,[],[70])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(82,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (~E(a1,x821)+P9(x821,f2(x821))),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[32,42,10])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(83,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (P9(a1,f2(a1))),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(equality_inference,[],[82])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(88,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (~P11(f2(a1),x881)+P10(x881,f3(x881))),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[71,43,45])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(107,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (P9(x1071,f3(x1071))+~P11(f2(a1),x1071)),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[88,49])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(114,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (E(f3(a1),f2(a1))+~P11(f2(a1),a1)),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[83,107,61])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(124,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (~P13(f2(a1),a1)),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[71,65,47,44])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(125,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (~P10(a1,f2(a1))),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[124,54])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(139,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (~P4(a1)+~E(f3(a1),f2(a1))),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[125,16,43])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(140,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (~P11(f2(a1),a1)+~P4(a1)),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[139,114])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(141,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     (~P4(a1)),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[83,140,52])).
% 0.71/0.80  cnf(144,plain,
% 0.71/0.80     ($false),
% 0.71/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[71,83,141,45,52]),
% 0.71/0.80     ['proof']).
% 0.71/0.80  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.71/0.80  % Total time :0.140000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------