↑ Up

SuperZenon---0.0.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : KRS110+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:31:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.44s 6.61s
% Output   : Proof 6.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : KRS110+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 06:57:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.44/6.61  % SZS status Theorem
% 6.44/6.61  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 6.44/6.61  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 6.44/6.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 6.44/6.61  1. (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) T_0) (-. (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) T_0))   ### Axiom
% 6.44/6.61  2. (-. (Ex Y, (ra_Px1 T_0 Y))) (Ex Y, (ra_Px1 T_0 Y))   ### Axiom
% 6.44/6.61  3. (cpxcomp T_0) (-. (Ex Y, (ra_Px1 T_0 Y)))   ### Definition-Pseudo(cpxcomp) 2
% 6.44/6.61  4. ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) T_0) => (cpxcomp T_0)) (-. (Ex Y, (ra_Px1 T_0 Y))) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) T_0)   ### Imply 1 3
% 6.44/6.61  5. (All Y, ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) Y) => (cpxcomp Y))) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) T_0) (-. (Ex Y, (ra_Px1 T_0 Y)))   ### All 4
% 6.44/6.61  6. (cp T_0) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) T_0) (All Y, ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) Y) => (cpxcomp Y)))   ### Definition-Pseudo(cp) 5
% 6.44/6.61  7. ((cp T_0) /\ (Ex Y, ((rinvS T_0 Y) /\ (cp Y)))) (All Y, ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) Y) => (cpxcomp Y))) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) T_0)   ### And 6
% 6.44/6.61  8. (ca_Ax2 T_0) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) T_0) (All Y, ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) Y) => (cpxcomp Y)))   ### Definition-Pseudo(ca_Ax2) 7
% 6.44/6.61  9. ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) T_0) /\ (ca_Ax2 T_0)) (All Y, ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) Y) => (cpxcomp Y)))   ### And 8
% 6.44/6.61  10. (Ex Y, ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) Y) /\ (ca_Ax2 Y))) (All Y, ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) Y) => (cpxcomp Y)))   ### Exists 9
% 6.44/6.61  11. ((Ex Y, ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) Y) /\ (ca_Ax2 Y))) /\ (All Y, ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565) Y) => (cpxcomp Y))))   ### And 10
% 6.44/6.61  12. (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_12565))   ### Definition-Pseudo(cUnsatisfiable) 11
% 6.44/6.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 6.44/6.61  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------