↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : KRS111+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:36:22 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.28s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  106 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   19 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  120 (  52   ~;  46   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   69 (   2 sgn  34   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( cp(X4)
    <=> ~ ? [X5] : ra_Px1(X4,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(axiom_4,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( cpxcomp(X4)
    <=> ? [X6] : ra_Px1(X4,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

fof(axiom_6,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X7] :
      ( ( rf1(X4,X5)
        & rf1(X4,X7) )
     => X5 = X7 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
    <=> ( ? [X5] :
            ( rf1(X4,X5)
            & cpxcomp(X5) )
        & ? [X5] :
            ( rs(X4,X5)
            & cowlThing(X5) )
        & ? [X5] :
            ( rf(X4,X5)
            & cp(X5) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_13,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( rs(X4,X5)
     => rf1(X4,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_13) ).

fof(axiom_5,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X7] :
      ( ( rf(X4,X5)
        & rf(X4,X7) )
     => X5 = X7 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

fof(axiom_12,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( rs(X4,X5)
     => rf(X4,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_12) ).

fof(axiom_11,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_11) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X159,X160,X161] :
      ( ( ~ cp(X159)
        | ~ ra_Px1(X159,X160) )
      & ( ra_Px1(X161,esk4_1(X161))
        | cp(X161) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X163,X165,X166] :
      ( ( ~ cpxcomp(X163)
        | ra_Px1(X163,esk5_1(X163)) )
      & ( ~ ra_Px1(X165,X166)
        | cpxcomp(X165) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_4])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X170,X171,X172] :
      ( ~ rf1(X170,X171)
      | ~ rf1(X170,X172)
      | X171 = X172 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_6])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X151,X155,X156,X157,X158] :
      ( ( rf1(X151,esk1_1(X151))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X151) )
      & ( cpxcomp(esk1_1(X151))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X151) )
      & ( rs(X151,esk2_1(X151))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X151) )
      & ( cowlThing(esk2_1(X151))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X151) )
      & ( rf(X151,esk3_1(X151))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X151) )
      & ( cp(esk3_1(X151))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X151) )
      & ( ~ rf1(X155,X156)
        | ~ cpxcomp(X156)
        | ~ rs(X155,X157)
        | ~ cowlThing(X157)
        | ~ rf(X155,X158)
        | ~ cp(X158)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X155) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X184,X185] :
      ( ~ rs(X184,X185)
      | rf1(X184,X185) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_13])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X167,X168,X169] :
      ( ~ rf(X167,X168)
      | ~ rf(X167,X169)
      | X168 = X169 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X182,X183] :
      ( ~ rs(X182,X183)
      | rf(X182,X183) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ cp(X1)
    | ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ra_Px1(X1,esk5_1(X1))
    | ~ cpxcomp(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X2 = X3
    | ~ rf1(X1,X2)
    | ~ rf1(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( rf1(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( rf1(X1,X2)
    | ~ rs(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( rs(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( X2 = X3
    | ~ rf(X1,X2)
    | ~ rf(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( rf(X1,esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( rf(X1,X2)
    | ~ rs(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ cpxcomp(X1)
    | ~ cp(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( cpxcomp(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( X1 = esk1_1(X2)
    | ~ rf1(X2,X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( rf1(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( X1 = esk3_1(X2)
    | ~ rf(X2,X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( rf(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ cp(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( esk1_1(X1) = esk2_1(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( cp(esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( esk3_1(X1) = esk2_1(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ cp(esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : KRS111+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:38:17 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.28/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.28/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.28/1.72  % Total time : 1.373s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------