↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KRS111+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:46:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  132 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   19 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  143 (  56   ~;  50   |;  29   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   73 (   2 sgn  40   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cpxcomp_substitution_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( cpxcomp(A)
        & A = B )
     => cpxcomp(B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cpxcomp_substitution_1) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
    <=> ( ? [Y] :
            ( cp(Y)
            & rf(X,Y) )
        & ? [Y] :
            ( cowlThing(Y)
            & rs(X,Y) )
        & ? [Y] :
            ( cpxcomp(Y)
            & rf1(X,Y) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cp(X)
    <=> ~ ? [Y] : ra_Px1(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(axiom_4,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cpxcomp(X)
    <=> ? [Y0] : ra_Px1(X,Y0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

fof(axiom_5,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( rf(X,Z)
        & rf(X,Y) )
     => Y = Z ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

fof(axiom_6,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( rf1(X,Z)
        & rf1(X,Y) )
     => Y = Z ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).

fof(axiom_12,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( rs(X,Y)
     => rf(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_12) ).

fof(axiom_13,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( rs(X,Y)
     => rf1(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_13) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    ( cpxcomp(A)
    | ~ cpxcomp(B)
    | A != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cpxcomp_substitution_1]) ).

fof(nnf_24,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ! [Y] :
            ( ~ cp(Y)
            | ~ rf(X,Y) )
        | ! [X4] :
            ( ~ cowlThing(X4)
            | ~ rs(X,X4) )
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ cpxcomp(X3)
            | ~ rf1(X,X3) )
        | cUnsatisfiable(X) )
      & ( ( ? [X2] :
              ( cp(X2)
              & rf(X,X2) )
          & ? [X1] :
              ( cowlThing(X1)
              & rs(X,X1) )
          & ? [X0] :
              ( cpxcomp(X0)
              & rf1(X,X0) ) )
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_2_sk,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ! [Y] :
            ( ~ cp(Y)
            | ~ rf(X,Y) )
        | ! [X4] :
            ( ~ cowlThing(X4)
            | ~ rs(X,X4) )
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ cpxcomp(X3)
            | ~ rf1(X,X3) )
        | cUnsatisfiable(X) )
      & ( ( cp(sK2(X))
          & rf(X,sK2(X))
          & cowlThing(sK1(X))
          & rs(X,sK1(X))
          & cpxcomp(sK0(X))
          & rf1(X,sK0(X)) )
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0(X)),skolemize(X1,sK1(X)),skolemize(X2,sK2(X))],[nnf_24]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_2,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( ~ cp(VAR_3)
        | ~ rf(VAR_0,VAR_3)
        | ~ cowlThing(VAR_2)
        | ~ rs(VAR_0,VAR_2)
        | ~ cpxcomp(VAR_1)
        | ~ rf1(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( cp(sK2(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( rf(VAR_0,sK2(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( cowlThing(sK1(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( rs(VAR_0,sK1(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( cpxcomp(sK0(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( rf1(VAR_0,sK0(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2_sk]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    ( rf1(A,sK0(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_61,plain,
    ( cpxcomp(sK0(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_62,plain,
    ( rs(A,sK1(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    ( rf(A,sK2(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_64,plain,
    ( cp(sK2(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_67,plain,
    ( ~ ra_Px1(A,B)
    | ~ cp(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_3]) ).

fof(nnf_26,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ! [Y0] : ~ ra_Px1(X,Y0)
        | cpxcomp(X) )
      & ( ? [X4] : ra_Px1(X,X4)
        | ~ cpxcomp(X) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_4]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_4_sk,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ! [Y0] : ~ ra_Px1(X,Y0)
        | cpxcomp(X) )
      & ( ra_Px1(X,sK3(X))
        | ~ cpxcomp(X) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(X4,sK3(X))],[nnf_26]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_4,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ ra_Px1(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | cpxcomp(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ra_Px1(VAR_0,sK3(VAR_0))
        | ~ cpxcomp(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_4_sk]) ).

cnf(c_69,plain,
    ( ra_Px1(A,sK3(A))
    | ~ cpxcomp(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_4]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    ( C = B
    | ~ rf(A,C)
    | ~ rf(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_5]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    ( C = B
    | ~ rf1(A,C)
    | ~ rf1(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_6]) ).

fof(axiom_11,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_11) ).

cnf(c_80,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_11]) ).

cnf(c_81,plain,
    ( rf(A,B)
    | ~ rs(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_12]) ).

cnf(c_82,plain,
    ( rf1(A,B)
    | ~ rs(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_13]) ).

cnf(c_87,plain,
    cp(sK2(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_64]) ).

cnf(c_88,plain,
    rf(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,sK2(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_63]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    rs(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,sK1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_62]) ).

cnf(c_90,plain,
    cpxcomp(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_61]) ).

cnf(c_91,plain,
    rf1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_95,plain,
    ~ ra_Px1(sK2(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425),A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_87]) ).

cnf(c_102,plain,
    ~ cpxcomp(sK2(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_95]) ).

cnf(c_130,plain,
    ( cpxcomp(A)
    | A != sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_90]) ).

cnf(c_103,plain,
    sK2(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425) != sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_102]) ).

cnf(c_131,plain,
    ( sK2(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425) = A
    | ~ rf(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_88]) ).

cnf(c_104,plain,
    ~ rf(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_131,c_103]) ).

cnf(c_107,plain,
    rf1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,sK1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_82]) ).

cnf(c_108,plain,
    rf(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,sK1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_81]) ).

cnf(c_132,plain,
    ( A = sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)
    | ~ rf1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_91]) ).

cnf(c_124,plain,
    sK1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425) = sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_107]) ).

cnf(c_133,plain,
    rf(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,sK0(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_108]) ).

cnf(c_129,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_133]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KRS111+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:40:39 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.35  % Process 1703778 was started by sandbox2 on n008,
% 0.09/0.35  % Fri Sep 25 19:40:39 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.36  
% 0.09/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/0.38  % Length of proof is 34.
% 0.13/0.38  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.13/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 16.000.
% 0.13/0.38  % Given clauses 61.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------