%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : KRS111+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:29:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.75s 0.97s
% Output : Refutation 0.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : KRS111+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 13:34:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Tue Jun 7 13:34:36 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 8522.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36 22 back subsumes 2.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36 48 back subsumes 27.
% 0.13/0.36 48 back subsumes 3.
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 52 during input processing: 0 [copy,52,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36 52 back subsumes 47.
% 0.13/0.36 52 back subsumes 46.
% 0.13/0.36 52 back subsumes 45.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 41
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 46
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 89
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.19/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 21
% 0.19/0.40 distinct predicate count: 15
% 0.19/0.40 distinct function count: 5
% 0.19/0.40 distinct constant count: 1
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.75/0.97 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.75/0.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 3 [ 1 1 132 ] (0.00 seconds, 425 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 4 [ 2 1 324 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 5 [ 1 1 328 ] (0.00 seconds, 14688 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 6 [ 1 1 236 ] (0.00 seconds, 10651 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 7 [ 2 1 273 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 8 [ 1 1 572 ] (0.00 seconds, 7418 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 9 [ 3 1 322 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 10 [ 2 1 397 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 11 [ 4 1 251 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 12 [ 5 1 9864 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 13 [ 3 0 398 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 14 [ 8 0 458 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 15 [ 6 0 1117 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Model 16 [ 10 2 88556 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.59 sec ----> 189 [hyper,185,31,70] {-} $F.
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Length of proof is 11. Level of proof is 5.
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.75/0.97 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.75/0.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 24 [] {+} -cUnsatisfiable(A)|rf1(A,$f1(A)).
% 0.75/0.97 25 [] {+} -cUnsatisfiable(A)|cpxcomp($f1(A)).
% 0.75/0.97 26 [] {+} -cUnsatisfiable(A)|rs(A,$f2(A)).
% 0.75/0.97 28 [] {+} -cUnsatisfiable(A)|rf(A,$f3(A)).
% 0.75/0.97 29 [] {+} -cUnsatisfiable(A)|cp($f3(A)).
% 0.75/0.97 31 [] {+} -cp(A)| -ra_Px1(A,B).
% 0.75/0.97 32 [] {+} -cpxcomp(A)|ra_Px1(A,$f5(A)).
% 0.75/0.97 34 [] {+} -rf(A,B)| -rf(A,C)|B=C.
% 0.75/0.97 35 [] {+} -rf1(A,B)| -rf1(A,C)|B=C.
% 0.75/0.97 43 [] {+} -rs(A,B)|rf(A,B).
% 0.75/0.97 44 [] {+} -rs(A,B)|rf1(A,B).
% 0.75/0.97 51 [] {-} cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425).
% 0.75/0.97 53 [hyper,51,29] {+} cp($f3(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)).
% 0.75/0.97 54 [hyper,51,28] {+} rf(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,$f3(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)).
% 0.75/0.97 55 [hyper,51,26] {-} rs(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,$f2(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)).
% 0.75/0.97 56 [hyper,51,25] {+} cpxcomp($f1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)).
% 0.75/0.97 57 [hyper,51,24] {+} rf1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,$f1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)).
% 0.75/0.97 70 [hyper,56,32] {-} ra_Px1($f1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425),$f5($f1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425))).
% 0.75/0.97 87 [hyper,55,44] {+} rf1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,$f2(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)).
% 0.75/0.97 88 [hyper,55,43] {-} rf(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425,$f2(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)).
% 0.75/0.97 132,131 [hyper,87,35,57,flip.1] {+} $f2(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)=$f1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425).
% 0.75/0.97 175,174 [hyper,88,34,54,demod,132] {-} $f3(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)=$f1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425).
% 0.75/0.97 185 [back_demod,53,demod,175] {-} cp($f1(i2003_11_14_17_21_15425)).
% 0.75/0.97 189 [hyper,185,31,70] {-} $F.
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.75/0.97 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.75/0.97
% 300.01/300.22 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------