↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : KRS112+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:32 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.98s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : KRS112+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 13:00:09 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.55/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.97  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.97  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.55/0.97  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.97  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.55/0.97  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.55/0.97  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.55/0.97  
% 0.55/0.97  % Result      :Theorem 0.350000s
% 0.55/0.97  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.350000s
% 0.55/0.97  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.97  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.97  % File     : KRS112+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.55/0.97  % Domain   : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web)
% 0.55/0.97  % Problem  : DL Test: t10.5
% 0.55/0.97  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.55/0.97  % English  :
% 0.55/0.97  
% 0.55/0.97  % Refs     : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.55/0.97  %          : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW
% 0.55/0.97  % Source   : [Bec03]
% 0.55/0.97  % Names    : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest613 [Bec03]
% 0.55/0.97  
% 0.55/0.97  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.55/0.97  % Rating   : 0.14 v8.2.0, 0.00 v3.1.0
% 0.55/0.97  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (   1 unt;   0 def)
% 0.55/0.97  %            Number of atoms       :  109 (  26 equ)
% 0.55/0.97  %            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
% 0.55/0.97  %            Number of connectives :   73 (   3   ~;   0   |;  32   &)
% 0.55/0.97  %                                         (   9 <=>;  29  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.55/0.97  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   5 avg)
% 0.55/0.97  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.55/0.97  %            Number of predicates  :   17 (  16 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.55/0.97  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.55/0.97  %            Number of variables   :   92 (  87   !;   5   ?)
% 0.55/0.97  % SPC      : FOF_UNS_RFO_SEQ
% 0.55/0.97  
% 0.55/0.97  % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of
% 0.55/0.97  %            datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's
% 0.55/0.97  %            still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL.
% 0.55/0.97  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.97  fof(cUnsatisfiable_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.97      ! [A,B] :
% 0.55/0.97        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.97          & cUnsatisfiable(A) )
% 0.55/0.97       => cUnsatisfiable(B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.97  
% 0.55/0.97  fof(ca_Ax2_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.97      ! [A,B] :
% 0.55/0.97        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.97          & ca_Ax2(A) )
% 0.55/0.97       => ca_Ax2(B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.97  
% 0.55/0.97  fof(ca_Vx3_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.97      ! [A,B] :
% 0.55/0.97        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.97          & ca_Vx3(A) )
% 0.55/0.97       => ca_Vx3(B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.97  
% 0.55/0.97  fof(cowlNothing_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.97      ! [A,B] :
% 0.55/0.97        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.97          & cowlNothing(A) )
% 0.55/0.97       => cowlNothing(B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.97  
% 0.55/0.97  fof(cowlThing_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.97      ! [A,B] :
% 0.55/0.97        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.97          & cowlThing(A) )
% 0.55/0.97       => cowlThing(B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.97  
% 0.55/0.97  fof(cp_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.97      ! [A,B] :
% 0.55/0.97        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.97          & cp(A) )
% 0.55/0.97       => cp(B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.97  
% 0.55/0.97  fof(cpxcomp_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.97      ! [A,B] :
% 0.55/0.97        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.97          & cpxcomp(A) )
% 0.55/0.97       => cpxcomp(B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.97  
% 0.55/0.97  fof(ra_Px1_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.97      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.97        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.97          & ra_Px1(A,C) )
% 0.55/0.97       => ra_Px1(B,C) ) ).
% 0.55/0.97  
% 0.55/0.97  fof(ra_Px1_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & ra_Px1(C,A) )
% 0.55/0.98       => ra_Px1(C,B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(rf_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & rf(A,C) )
% 0.55/0.98       => rf(B,C) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(rf_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & rf(C,A) )
% 0.55/0.98       => rf(C,B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(rf1_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & rf1(A,C) )
% 0.55/0.98       => rf1(B,C) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(rf1_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & rf1(C,A) )
% 0.55/0.98       => rf1(C,B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(rinvF_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & rinvF(A,C) )
% 0.55/0.98       => rinvF(B,C) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(rinvF_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & rinvF(C,A) )
% 0.55/0.98       => rinvF(C,B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(rinvF1_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & rinvF1(A,C) )
% 0.55/0.98       => rinvF1(B,C) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(rinvF1_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & rinvF1(C,A) )
% 0.55/0.98       => rinvF1(C,B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(rinvS_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & rinvS(A,C) )
% 0.55/0.98       => rinvS(B,C) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(rinvS_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & rinvS(C,A) )
% 0.55/0.98       => rinvS(C,B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(rs_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & rs(A,C) )
% 0.55/0.98       => rs(B,C) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(rs_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & rs(C,A) )
% 0.55/0.98       => rs(C,B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(xsd_integer_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & xsd_integer(A) )
% 0.55/0.98       => xsd_integer(B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(xsd_string_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [A,B] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( A = B
% 0.55/0.98          & xsd_string(A) )
% 0.55/0.98       => xsd_string(B) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_0,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.55/0.98        & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_1,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.55/0.98      <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----Equality cUnsatisfiable
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_2,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
% 0.55/0.98      <=> ( ? [Y] :
% 0.55/0.98              ( rf1(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.98              & ca_Ax2(Y) )
% 0.55/0.98          & ? [Y] :
% 0.55/0.98              ( rf(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.98              & cp(Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----Equality cp
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_3,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( cp(X)
% 0.55/0.98      <=> ~ ? [Y] : ra_Px1(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----Equality cpxcomp
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_4,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( cpxcomp(X)
% 0.55/0.98      <=> ? [Y0] : ra_Px1(X,Y0) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----Equality ca_Ax2
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_5,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ca_Ax2(X)
% 0.55/0.98      <=> ( cpxcomp(X)
% 0.55/0.98          & ! [Y] :
% 0.55/0.98              ( rinvF1(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.98             => ca_Vx3(Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----Equality ca_Vx3
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_6,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ca_Vx3(X)
% 0.55/0.98      <=> ? [Y] :
% 0.55/0.98            ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.98            & cowlThing(Y) ) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----Functional: rf
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_7,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( rf(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.98          & rf(X,Z) )
% 0.55/0.98       => Y = Z ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----Functional: rf1
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_8,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( rf1(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.98          & rf1(X,Z) )
% 0.55/0.98       => Y = Z ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----Inverse: rinvF
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_9,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( rinvF(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.98      <=> rf(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----Inverse: rinvF1
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_10,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( rinvF1(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.98      <=> rf1(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----Inverse: rinvS
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_11,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( rinvS(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.98      <=> rs(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----Functional: rs
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_12,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.98          & rs(X,Z) )
% 0.55/0.98       => Y = Z ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %----i2003_11_14_17_21_19256
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_13,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_19256) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_14,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.98       => rf(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  fof(axiom_15,axiom,
% 0.55/0.98      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.55/0.98        ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.55/0.98       => rf1(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.98  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.98  % Proof found
% 0.55/0.98  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.98  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.55/0.98  %ClaNum:61(EqnAxiom:31)
% 0.55/0.98  %VarNum:103(SingletonVarNum:49)
% 0.55/0.98  %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.55/0.98  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.55/0.98  %SharedTerms:2
% 0.55/0.98  [32]P1(a1)
% 0.55/0.98  [33]~P2(x331)
% 0.55/0.98  [34]P15(x341)+P5(x341)
% 0.55/0.98  [35]~P3(x351)+P6(x351)
% 0.55/0.98  [36]~P15(x361)+~P5(x361)
% 0.55/0.98  [37]~P1(x371)+P3(f2(x371))
% 0.55/0.98  [38]~P1(x381)+P7(f3(x381))
% 0.55/0.98  [39]P7(x391)+P8(x391,f4(x391))
% 0.55/0.98  [42]~P6(x421)+P8(x421,f5(x421))
% 0.55/0.98  [43]~P1(x431)+P10(x431,f3(x431))
% 0.55/0.98  [44]~P1(x441)+P11(x441,f2(x441))
% 0.55/0.98  [45]~P4(x451)+P9(x451,f6(x451))
% 0.55/0.98  [40]P4(x401)+~P9(x401,x402)
% 0.55/0.98  [41]P6(x411)+~P8(x411,x412)
% 0.55/0.98  [47]~P7(x471)+~P8(x471,x472)
% 0.55/0.98  [50]~P13(x502,x501)+P10(x501,x502)
% 0.55/0.98  [51]~P9(x511,x512)+P10(x511,x512)
% 0.55/0.98  [52]~P12(x522,x521)+P11(x521,x522)
% 0.55/0.98  [53]~P9(x531,x532)+P11(x531,x532)
% 0.55/0.98  [54]~P10(x542,x541)+P13(x541,x542)
% 0.55/0.98  [55]~P11(x552,x551)+P12(x551,x552)
% 0.55/0.98  [56]~P9(x562,x561)+P14(x561,x562)
% 0.55/0.98  [57]~P14(x572,x571)+P9(x571,x572)
% 0.55/0.98  [46]~P6(x461)+P3(x461)+~P4(f7(x461))
% 0.55/0.98  [48]~P6(x481)+P3(x481)+P12(x481,f7(x481))
% 0.55/0.98  [49]~P12(x492,x491)+P4(x491)+~P3(x492)
% 0.55/0.98  [58]~P10(x583,x581)+E(x581,x582)+~P10(x583,x582)
% 0.55/0.98  [59]~P11(x593,x591)+E(x591,x592)+~P11(x593,x592)
% 0.55/0.98  [60]~P9(x603,x601)+E(x601,x602)+~P9(x603,x602)
% 0.55/0.98  [61]~P10(x611,x613)+~P11(x611,x612)+P1(x611)+~P3(x612)+~P7(x613)
% 0.55/0.98  %EqnAxiom
% 0.55/0.98  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.55/0.98  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.55/0.98  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.55/0.98  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 0.55/0.98  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x51),f3(x52))
% 0.55/0.98  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f4(x61),f4(x62))
% 0.55/0.98  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x71),f5(x72))
% 0.55/0.98  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f7(x81),f7(x82))
% 0.55/0.98  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f6(x91),f6(x92))
% 0.55/0.98  [10]~P1(x101)+P1(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 0.55/0.98  [11]~P2(x111)+P2(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 0.55/0.98  [12]~P5(x121)+P5(x122)+~E(x121,x122)
% 0.55/0.98  [13]~P15(x131)+P15(x132)+~E(x131,x132)
% 0.55/0.98  [14]~P6(x141)+P6(x142)+~E(x141,x142)
% 0.55/0.98  [15]~P3(x151)+P3(x152)+~E(x151,x152)
% 0.55/0.98  [16]P9(x162,x163)+~E(x161,x162)+~P9(x161,x163)
% 0.55/0.98  [17]P9(x173,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P9(x173,x171)
% 0.55/0.98  [18]P12(x182,x183)+~E(x181,x182)+~P12(x181,x183)
% 0.55/0.98  [19]P12(x193,x192)+~E(x191,x192)+~P12(x193,x191)
% 0.55/0.98  [20]P14(x202,x203)+~E(x201,x202)+~P14(x201,x203)
% 0.55/0.98  [21]P14(x213,x212)+~E(x211,x212)+~P14(x213,x211)
% 0.55/0.98  [22]P11(x222,x223)+~E(x221,x222)+~P11(x221,x223)
% 0.55/0.98  [23]P11(x233,x232)+~E(x231,x232)+~P11(x233,x231)
% 0.55/0.98  [24]~P7(x241)+P7(x242)+~E(x241,x242)
% 0.55/0.98  [25]P10(x252,x253)+~E(x251,x252)+~P10(x251,x253)
% 0.55/0.98  [26]P10(x263,x262)+~E(x261,x262)+~P10(x263,x261)
% 0.55/0.98  [27]P8(x272,x273)+~E(x271,x272)+~P8(x271,x273)
% 0.55/0.98  [28]P8(x283,x282)+~E(x281,x282)+~P8(x283,x281)
% 0.55/0.98  [29]~P4(x291)+P4(x292)+~E(x291,x292)
% 0.55/0.98  [30]P13(x302,x303)+~E(x301,x302)+~P13(x301,x303)
% 0.55/0.98  [31]P13(x313,x312)+~E(x311,x312)+~P13(x313,x311)
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.98  cnf(63,plain,
% 0.55/0.98     (~P3(x631)+P8(x631,f5(x631))),
% 0.55/0.98     inference(scs_inference,[],[35,42])).
% 0.55/0.98  cnf(64,plain,
% 0.55/0.98     (~E(a1,x641)+P3(f2(x641))),
% 0.55/0.98     inference(scs_inference,[],[32,37,10])).
% 0.55/0.98  cnf(65,plain,
% 0.55/0.98     (P3(f2(a1))),
% 0.55/0.98     inference(equality_inference,[],[64])).
% 0.55/0.98  cnf(66,plain,
% 0.55/0.98     (~E(a1,x661)+P7(f3(x661))),
% 0.55/0.98     inference(scs_inference,[],[32,38,10])).
% 0.55/0.98  cnf(67,plain,
% 0.55/0.98     (P7(f3(a1))),
% 0.55/0.98     inference(equality_inference,[],[66])).
% 0.55/0.98  cnf(72,plain,
% 0.55/0.98     (~P6(f3(a1))),
% 0.55/0.98     inference(scs_inference,[],[67,47,63,42])).
% 0.55/0.98  cnf(74,plain,
% 0.55/0.98     (~P9(x741,x742)+P9(x741,f6(x741))),
% 0.55/0.98     inference(scs_inference,[],[40,45])).
% 0.55/0.98  cnf(75,plain,
% 0.55/0.98     (~E(x751,f3(a1))+~P8(x751,x752)),
% 0.55/0.98     inference(scs_inference,[],[72,41,14])).
% 0.55/0.98  cnf(81,plain,
% 0.55/0.98     (~E(a1,x811)+P10(x811,f3(x811))),
% 0.55/0.98     inference(scs_inference,[],[32,43,10])).
% 0.55/0.98  cnf(82,plain,
% 0.55/0.98     (P10(a1,f3(a1))),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(equality_inference,[],[81])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(87,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (~E(a1,x871)+P11(x871,f2(x871))),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[32,44,10])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(88,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (P11(a1,f2(a1))),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(equality_inference,[],[87])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(96,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (P12(x961,x962)+~P9(x962,x961)),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[53,55])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(102,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (P10(x1021,f6(x1021))+~P9(x1021,x1022)),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[74,51])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(106,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (~P9(a1,x1061)+E(f6(a1),f3(a1))),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[82,102,58])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(116,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (~P4(a1)+E(f6(a1),f3(a1))),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[106,45])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(117,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (~P8(f6(a1),x1171)+~P4(a1)),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[116,75])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(118,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (P7(f6(a1))+~P4(a1)),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[117,39])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(119,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (~E(f6(a1),x1191)+P7(x1191)+~P4(a1)),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[118,24])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(167,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (P8(f2(a1),f5(f2(a1)))),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[65,35,42])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(194,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (~E(f6(a1),f2(a1))+~P4(a1)),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[167,47,119])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(195,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (~E(f2(a1),f6(a1))+~P4(a1)),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[194,2])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(196,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (~P11(a1,f6(a1))+~P4(a1)),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[88,195,59])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(197,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (~P12(f6(a1),a1)+~P4(a1)),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[196,52])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(198,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (~P9(a1,f6(a1))+~P4(a1)),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[197,96])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(199,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     (~P4(a1)),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[198,45])).
% 0.55/0.99  cnf(206,plain,
% 0.55/0.99     ($false),
% 0.55/0.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[88,199,65,40,57,49,55]),
% 0.55/0.99     ['proof']).
% 0.55/0.99  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.55/0.99  % Total time :0.350000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------