%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : KRS120+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:36:23 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.11s 1.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 44 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 120 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 137 ( 61 ~; 50 |; 18 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 10 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 70 ( 4 sgn 33 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_0,axiom,
! [X4] :
( cowlThing(X4)
& ~ cowlNothing(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_0) ).
fof(axiom_3,axiom,
! [X4] :
( cp1(X4)
<=> ~ ? [X5] : ra_Px1(X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).
fof(axiom_4,axiom,
! [X4] :
( cp1xcomp(X4)
<=> ? [X6] : ra_Px1(X4,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).
fof(axiom_7,axiom,
! [X4] :
( cowlThing(X4)
=> ! [X6,X7] :
( ( rf(X4,X6)
& rf(X4,X7) )
=> X6 = X7 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_7) ).
fof(axiom_6,axiom,
! [X4] :
( ca_Vx3(X4)
<=> ? [X5] :
( rf(X4,X5)
& cp1xcomp(X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).
fof(axiom_5,axiom,
! [X4] :
( ca_Ax2(X4)
<=> ( ? [X5] :
( rinvF(X4,X5)
& ca_Vx3(X5) )
& cp1(X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
! [X4] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
<=> ? [X5] :
( rf(X4,X5)
& ca_Ax2(X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).
fof(axiom_8,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( rinvF(X4,X5)
<=> rf(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_8) ).
fof(axiom_11,axiom,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_48796),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_11) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X4] :
( cowlThing(X4)
& ~ cowlNothing(X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_0]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X133,X134,X135] :
( ( ~ cp1(X133)
| ~ ra_Px1(X133,X134) )
& ( ra_Px1(X135,esk2_1(X135))
| cp1(X135) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X137,X139,X140] :
( ( ~ cp1xcomp(X137)
| ra_Px1(X137,esk3_1(X137)) )
& ( ~ ra_Px1(X139,X140)
| cp1xcomp(X139) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_4])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X149,X150,X151] :
( ~ cowlThing(X149)
| ~ rf(X149,X150)
| ~ rf(X149,X151)
| X150 = X151 ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_7])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X127] :
( cowlThing(X127)
& ~ cowlNothing(X127) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ cp1(X1)
| ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ra_Px1(X1,esk3_1(X1))
| ~ cp1xcomp(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X145,X147,X148] :
( ( rf(X145,esk5_1(X145))
| ~ ca_Vx3(X145) )
& ( cp1xcomp(esk5_1(X145))
| ~ ca_Vx3(X145) )
& ( ~ rf(X147,X148)
| ~ cp1xcomp(X148)
| ca_Vx3(X147) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_6])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( X2 = X3
| ~ cowlThing(X1)
| ~ rf(X1,X2)
| ~ rf(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
cowlThing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ cp1xcomp(X1)
| ~ cp1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( cp1xcomp(esk5_1(X1))
| ~ ca_Vx3(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X141,X143,X144] :
( ( rinvF(X141,esk4_1(X141))
| ~ ca_Ax2(X141) )
& ( ca_Vx3(esk4_1(X141))
| ~ ca_Ax2(X141) )
& ( cp1(X141)
| ~ ca_Ax2(X141) )
& ( ~ rinvF(X143,X144)
| ~ ca_Vx3(X144)
| ~ cp1(X143)
| ca_Ax2(X143) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( X2 = X3
| ~ rf(X1,X3)
| ~ rf(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( rf(X1,esk5_1(X1))
| ~ ca_Vx3(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X129,X131,X132] :
( ( rf(X129,esk1_1(X129))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X129) )
& ( ca_Ax2(esk1_1(X129))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X129) )
& ( ~ rf(X131,X132)
| ~ ca_Ax2(X132)
| cUnsatisfiable(X131) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X152,X153] :
( ( ~ rinvF(X152,X153)
| rf(X153,X152) )
& ( ~ rf(X153,X152)
| rinvF(X152,X153) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ cp1(esk5_1(X1))
| ~ ca_Vx3(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( cp1(X1)
| ~ ca_Ax2(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( X1 = esk5_1(X2)
| ~ rf(X2,X1)
| ~ ca_Vx3(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( rf(X1,esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( rf(X2,X1)
| ~ rinvF(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( rinvF(X1,esk4_1(X1))
| ~ ca_Ax2(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ ca_Vx3(X1)
| ~ ca_Ax2(esk5_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( esk5_1(X1) = esk1_1(X1)
| ~ ca_Vx3(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ca_Ax2(esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| ~ rf(X1,X2)
| ~ ca_Ax2(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( rf(esk4_1(X1),X1)
| ~ ca_Ax2(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ ca_Vx3(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( cUnsatisfiable(esk4_1(X1))
| ~ ca_Ax2(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ca_Vx3(esk4_1(X1))
| ~ ca_Ax2(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
~ ca_Ax2(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_48796),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.06 % Problem : KRS120+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.06/0.24 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.24 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.24 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.24 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.24 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.24 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.24 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.06/0.24 % DateTime : Mon May 4 20:37:46 EDT 2026
% 0.06/0.24 % CPUTime :
% 0.06/0.25 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.11/1.61 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.11/1.61 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.11/1.61 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.11/1.61 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.11/1.61 % Total time : 1.361s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------