%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS124+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n002.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:35 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.61s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.54s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.04/0.12 % Problem : KRS124+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.04/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 12:36:54 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.54/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.54/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.54/0.60 % Transform :cnf % 0.54/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.54/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.54/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.60 % File : KRS124+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.54/0.60 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web) % 0.54/0.60 % Problem : DL Test: heinsohn1.2 % 0.54/0.60 % Version : Especial. % 0.54/0.60 % English : Tbox tests from [HK+94] % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 % Refs : [HK+94] Heinsohn et al. (1994), An Empirical Analysis of Termi % 0.54/0.60 % : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.54/0.60 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW % 0.54/0.60 % Source : [Bec03] % 0.54/0.60 % Names : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest642 [Bec03] % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.54/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.25 v6.0.0, 0.00 v3.1.0 % 0.54/0.61 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 1 unt; 0 def) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of atoms : 31 ( 0 equ) % 0.54/0.61 % Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of connectives : 21 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 4 &) % 0.54/0.61 % ( 7 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.54/0.61 % Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg) % 0.54/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of predicates : 17 ( 17 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of variables : 19 ( 14 !; 5 ?) % 0.54/0.61 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_NEQ % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of % 0.54/0.61 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's % 0.54/0.61 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL. % 0.54/0.61 % : Tests incoherency caused by disjoint concept % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.61 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_0,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.54/0.61 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_1,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.54/0.61 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----Equality cUnsatisfiable % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_2,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( cUnsatisfiable(X) % 0.54/0.61 <=> ( ? [Y] : % 0.54/0.61 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.54/0.61 & cowlThing(Y) ) % 0.54/0.61 & ! [Y] : % 0.54/0.61 ( rr(X,Y) % 0.54/0.61 => ca_Ax3(Y) ) ) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----Super cc % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_3,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( cc(X) % 0.54/0.61 => cdxcomp(X) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----Super cc1 % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_4,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( cc1(X) % 0.54/0.61 => cd1(X) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----Super cc1 % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_5,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( cc1(X) % 0.54/0.61 => cd1xcomp(X) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----Equality cd % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_6,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( cd(X) % 0.54/0.61 <=> ~ ? [Y] : ra_Px1(X,Y) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----Equality cdxcomp % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_7,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( cdxcomp(X) % 0.54/0.61 <=> ? [Y0] : ra_Px1(X,Y0) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----Equality cd1 % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_8,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( cd1(X) % 0.54/0.61 <=> ? [Y0] : ra_Px2(X,Y0) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----Equality cd1xcomp % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_9,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( cd1xcomp(X) % 0.54/0.61 <=> ~ ? [Y] : ra_Px2(X,Y) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----Super ce3 % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_10,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( ce3(X) % 0.54/0.61 => cc(X) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----Super cf % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_11,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( cf(X) % 0.54/0.61 => cd(X) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----Equality ca_Ax3 % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_12,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.54/0.61 ( ca_Ax3(X) % 0.54/0.61 <=> ( cd(X) % 0.54/0.61 & cc(X) ) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %----i2003_11_14_17_22_10903 % 0.54/0.61 fof(axiom_13,axiom, % 0.54/0.61 cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_10903) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 % Proof found % 0.54/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.54/0.61 % SZS output start Proof % 0.54/0.61 %ClaNum:24(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.54/0.61 %VarNum:62(SingletonVarNum:30) % 0.54/0.61 %MaxLitNum:3 % 0.54/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.54/0.61 %SharedTerms:2 % 0.54/0.61 [1]P1(a1) % 0.54/0.61 [2]~P2(x21) % 0.54/0.61 [3]P13(x31)+P12(x31) % 0.54/0.61 [4]~P4(x41)+P3(x41) % 0.54/0.61 [5]~P5(x51)+P3(x51) % 0.54/0.61 [6]~P3(x61)+P6(x61) % 0.54/0.61 [7]~P8(x71)+P7(x71) % 0.54/0.61 [8]~P8(x81)+P10(x81) % 0.54/0.61 [9]~P4(x91)+P9(x91) % 0.54/0.61 [10]~P11(x101)+P9(x101) % 0.54/0.61 [11]~P13(x111)+~P12(x111) % 0.54/0.61 [13]P10(x131)+P14(x131,f2(x131)) % 0.54/0.61 [14]P9(x141)+P15(x141,f3(x141)) % 0.54/0.61 [17]~P1(x171)+P16(x171,f4(x171)) % 0.54/0.61 [18]~P6(x181)+P15(x181,f6(x181)) % 0.54/0.61 [19]~P7(x191)+P14(x191,f7(x191)) % 0.54/0.61 [15]P6(x151)+~P15(x151,x152) % 0.54/0.61 [16]P7(x161)+~P14(x161,x162) % 0.54/0.61 [20]~P10(x201)+~P14(x201,x202) % 0.54/0.61 [21]~P9(x211)+~P15(x211,x212) % 0.54/0.61 [12]~P3(x121)+~P9(x121)+P4(x121) % 0.54/0.61 [22]~P16(x222,x221)+P4(x221)+~P1(x222) % 0.54/0.61 [23]P1(x231)+~P16(x231,x232)+~P4(f5(x231)) % 0.54/0.61 [24]P1(x241)+~P16(x241,x242)+P16(x241,f5(x241)) % 0.54/0.61 %EqnAxiom % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 cnf(26,plain, % 0.54/0.61 (P6(x261)+~P4(x261)), % 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,6])). % 0.54/0.61 cnf(27,plain, % 0.54/0.61 (~P4(x271)+~P15(x271,x272)), % 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,21])). % 0.54/0.61 cnf(28,plain, % 0.54/0.61 (P6(x281)+~P16(a1,x281)), % 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,26,22])). % 0.54/0.61 cnf(32,plain, % 0.54/0.61 (~P15(x321,x322)+~P16(a1,x321)), % 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,27,22])). % 0.54/0.61 cnf(33,plain, % 0.54/0.61 (~P16(a1,x331)+P15(x331,f6(x331))), % 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,18])). % 0.54/0.61 cnf(36,plain, % 0.54/0.61 (~P16(a1,x361)), % 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[32,33])). % 0.54/0.61 cnf(37,plain, % 0.54/0.61 ($false), % 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,36,17]), % 0.54/0.61 ['proof']). % 0.54/0.61 % SZS output end Proof % 0.54/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------