%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS127+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:00:49 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 87 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 30 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 109 ( 47 ~; 43 |; 14 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 20 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 2 sgn 19 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_4,axiom,
! [X4] :
( cd(X4)
<=> ~ ? [X5] : ra_Px1(X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).
fof(axiom_5,axiom,
! [X4] :
( cdxcomp(X4)
<=> ? [X6] : ra_Px1(X4,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
! [X4] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
<=> ( ! [X6,X7] :
( ( rr(X4,X7)
& rr(X4,X6) )
=> X6 = X7 )
& ? [X5] :
( cd(X5)
& rr(X4,X5) )
& ? [X5] :
( cc(X5)
& rr(X4,X5) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).
fof(axiom_3,axiom,
! [X4] :
( cc(X4)
=> cdxcomp(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).
fof(axiom_6,axiom,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X49,X50,X51] :
( ( cd(X51)
| ra_Px1(X51,esk5_1(X51)) )
& ( ~ ra_Px1(X49,X50)
| ~ cd(X49) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_4])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X53,X55,X56] :
( ( cdxcomp(X55)
| ~ ra_Px1(X55,X56) )
& ( ra_Px1(X53,esk6_1(X53))
| ~ cdxcomp(X53) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X38,X41,X42,X43,X44,X45] :
( ( cUnsatisfiable(X43)
| ~ cd(X45)
| ~ rr(X43,X45)
| ~ cc(X44)
| ~ rr(X43,X44)
| esk3_1(X43) != esk4_1(X43) )
& ( cUnsatisfiable(X43)
| ~ cd(X45)
| ~ rr(X43,X45)
| ~ cc(X44)
| ~ rr(X43,X44)
| rr(X43,esk4_1(X43)) )
& ( cUnsatisfiable(X43)
| ~ cd(X45)
| ~ rr(X43,X45)
| ~ cc(X44)
| ~ rr(X43,X44)
| rr(X43,esk3_1(X43)) )
& ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X38)
| X41 = X42
| ~ rr(X38,X42)
| ~ rr(X38,X41) )
& ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X38)
| cd(esk2_1(X38)) )
& ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X38)
| rr(X38,esk2_1(X38)) )
& ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X38)
| cc(esk1_1(X38)) )
& ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X38)
| rr(X38,esk1_1(X38)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2)
| ~ cd(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ cdxcomp(X1)
| ra_Px1(X1,esk6_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X48] :
( cdxcomp(X48)
| ~ cc(X48) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| ~ rr(X1,X3)
| ~ rr(X1,X2)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| rr(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ cd(X1)
| ~ cdxcomp(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ cc(X1)
| cdxcomp(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rr(X2,X1)
| X1 = esk2_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| rr(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ cc(X1)
| ~ cd(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| cc(esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| cd(esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| esk2_1(X1) = esk1_1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cd(esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS127+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:54:51 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1098089 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.44 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1098102 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.44 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.12/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Initial clauses : 30
% 0.12/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 13
% 0.12/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.12/0.45 % Processed clauses : 21
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 0.12/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.12/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Generated clauses : 14
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
% 0.12/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Paramodulations : 13
% 0.12/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.12/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 10
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.12/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 23
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.12/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 45
% 0.12/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.12/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2047
% 0.12/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 495
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.45 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.12/0.45 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------