↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : KRS127+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:42 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.15s 2.55s
% Output   : Refutation 4.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   19
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  125 (  27 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  225 (   8   ~;   0   |;  45   &; 131   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  37  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  11 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   86 (   0   ^;  74   !;  12   ?;  86   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(cUnsatisfiable_decl,type,
    cUnsatisfiable: $i > $o ).

thf(cc_decl,type,
    cc: $i > $o ).

thf(cd_decl,type,
    cd: $i > $o ).

thf(cdxcomp_decl,type,
    cdxcomp: $i > $o ).

thf(cowlNothing_decl,type,
    cowlNothing: $i > $o ).

thf(cowlThing_decl,type,
    cowlThing: $i > $o ).

thf(ra_Px1_decl,type,
    ra_Px1: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(rr_decl,type,
    rr: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(xsd_integer_decl,type,
    xsd_integer: $i > $o ).

thf(xsd_string_decl,type,
    xsd_string: $i > $o ).

thf(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794_decl,type,
    i2003_11_14_17_22_27794: $i ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( C @ rr ) )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ ( C @ rr ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rr_substitution_2) ).

thf(56,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( C @ rr ) )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ ( C @ rr ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ cc )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ cc ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc_substitution_1) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ cc )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ cc ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(1,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ cUnsatisfiable )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ cUnsatisfiable ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cUnsatisfiable_substitution_1) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ cUnsatisfiable )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ cUnsatisfiable ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ xsd_string )
    <=> ~ ( A @ xsd_integer ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).

thf(74,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( A @ xsd_integer )
       => ( A @ xsd_string ) )
      & ( ( A @ xsd_string )
       => ~ ( A @ xsd_integer ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ xsd_integer )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ xsd_integer ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',xsd_integer_substitution_1) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ xsd_integer )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ xsd_integer ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ cd )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ cd ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cd_substitution_1) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ cd )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ cd ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ cc )
     => ( A @ cdxcomp ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

thf(96,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ cc )
     => ( A @ cdxcomp ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( C @ ( B @ ra_Px1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ra_Px1_substitution_1) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( C @ ( B @ ra_Px1 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ cd )
    <=> ~ ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

thf(98,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) )
       => ( A @ cd ) )
      & ( ( A @ cd )
       => ~ ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ cUnsatisfiable )
    <=> ( ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( ( C @ ( A @ rr ) )
              & ( B @ ( A @ rr ) ) )
           => ( B = C ) )
        & ? [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ cd )
            & ( B @ ( A @ rr ) ) )
        & ? [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ cc )
            & ( B @ ( A @ rr ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

thf(80,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
              ( ( ( C @ ( A @ rr ) )
                & ( B @ ( A @ rr ) ) )
             => ( B = C ) )
          & ? [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ cd )
              & ( B @ ( A @ rr ) ) )
          & ? [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ cc )
              & ( B @ ( A @ rr ) ) ) )
       => ( A @ cUnsatisfiable ) )
      & ( ( A @ cUnsatisfiable )
       => ( ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
              ( ( ( C @ ( A @ rr ) )
                & ( B @ ( A @ rr ) ) )
             => ( B = C ) )
          & ? [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ cd )
              & ( B @ ( A @ rr ) ) )
          & ? [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ cc )
              & ( B @ ( A @ rr ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( C @ ra_Px1 ) )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ ( C @ ra_Px1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ra_Px1_substitution_2) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( C @ ra_Px1 ) )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ ( C @ ra_Px1 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ cdxcomp )
    <=> ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

thf(104,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) )
       => ( A @ cdxcomp ) )
      & ( ( A @ cdxcomp )
       => ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ cowlThing )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ cowlThing ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cowlThing_substitution_1) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ cowlThing )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ cowlThing ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ cowlNothing )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ cowlNothing ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cowlNothing_substitution_1) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ cowlNothing )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ cowlNothing ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ cowlNothing )
      & ( A @ cowlThing ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_0) ).

thf(68,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ cowlNothing )
      & ( A @ cowlThing ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ rr ) )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( C @ ( B @ rr ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rr_substitution_1) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ rr ) )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( C @ ( B @ rr ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    i2003_11_14_17_22_27794 @ cUnsatisfiable,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).

thf(110,plain,
    i2003_11_14_17_22_27794 @ cUnsatisfiable,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ cdxcomp )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ cdxcomp ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cdxcomp_substitution_1) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ cdxcomp )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ cdxcomp ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ xsd_string )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ xsd_string ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',xsd_string_substitution_1) ).

thf(64,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ xsd_string )
        & ( A = B ) )
     => ( B @ xsd_string ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(111,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[56,24,20,74,60,28,96,44,98,80,48,104,40,36,68,52,110,32,64]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KRS127+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.40  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:38:39 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.84/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.20/1.18  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (195ms). 
% 1.36/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.96/1.61  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.96/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.96/1.66  % [INFO] 	 19 axioms and no conjecture found. 
% 2.14/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.14/1.76  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.14/1.77  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.15/2.55  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.15/2.55  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.15/2.55  % Time passed: 2003ms (effective reasoning time: 1342ms)
% 4.15/2.55  % Axioms used in derivation (19): cowlNothing_substitution_1, cc_substitution_1, rr_substitution_1, axiom_2, xsd_string_substitution_1, axiom_3, axiom_5, axiom_0, rr_substitution_2, axiom_4, axiom_6, ra_Px1_substitution_1, cowlThing_substitution_1, cd_substitution_1, cdxcomp_substitution_1, ra_Px1_substitution_2, cUnsatisfiable_substitution_1, axiom_1, xsd_integer_substitution_1
% 4.15/2.55  % No. of inferences in proof: 39
% 4.15/2.55  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2003 ms resp. 1342 ms w/o parsing
% 4.43/2.62  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.43/2.62  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------