↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KRS127+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:46:06 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   30 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  160 (  64   ~;  60   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   2 sgn  41   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cdxcomp_substitution_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( cdxcomp(A)
        & A = B )
     => cdxcomp(B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cdxcomp_substitution_1) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
    <=> ( ! [Y0,Y1] :
            ( ( rr(X,Y1)
              & rr(X,Y0) )
           => Y0 = Y1 )
        & ? [Y] :
            ( cd(Y)
            & rr(X,Y) )
        & ? [Y] :
            ( cc(Y)
            & rr(X,Y) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cc(X)
     => cdxcomp(X) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(axiom_4,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cd(X)
    <=> ~ ? [Y] : ra_Px1(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

fof(axiom_5,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cdxcomp(X)
    <=> ? [Y0] : ra_Px1(X,Y0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    ( cdxcomp(A)
    | ~ cdxcomp(B)
    | A != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cdxcomp_substitution_1]) ).

fof(nnf_15,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ? [Y0,Y1] :
            ( Y1 != Y0
            & rr(X,Y1)
            & rr(X,Y0) )
        | ! [Y] :
            ( ~ cd(Y)
            | ~ rr(X,Y) )
        | ! [X4] :
            ( ~ cc(X4)
            | ~ rr(X,X4) )
        | cUnsatisfiable(X) )
      & ( ( ! [X2,X3] :
              ( X3 = X2
              | ~ rr(X,X3)
              | ~ rr(X,X2) )
          & ? [X1] :
              ( cd(X1)
              & rr(X,X1) )
          & ? [X0] :
              ( cc(X0)
              & rr(X,X0) ) )
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_2_sk,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ( sK4(X) != sK3(X)
          & rr(X,sK4(X))
          & rr(X,sK3(X)) )
        | ! [Y] :
            ( ~ cd(Y)
            | ~ rr(X,Y) )
        | ! [X4] :
            ( ~ cc(X4)
            | ~ rr(X,X4) )
        | cUnsatisfiable(X) )
      & ( ( ! [X2,X3] :
              ( X3 = X2
              | ~ rr(X,X3)
              | ~ rr(X,X2) )
          & cd(sK1(X))
          & rr(X,sK1(X))
          & cc(sK0(X))
          & rr(X,sK0(X)) )
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK0(X)),skolemize(X1,sK1(X)),skolemize(Y0,sK3(X)),skolemize(Y1,sK4(X))],[nnf_15]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_2,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( sK4(VAR_0) != sK3(VAR_0)
        | ~ cd(VAR_2)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_2)
        | ~ cc(VAR_1)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( rr(VAR_0,sK4(VAR_0))
        | ~ cd(VAR_2)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_2)
        | ~ cc(VAR_1)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( rr(VAR_0,sK3(VAR_0))
        | ~ cd(VAR_2)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_2)
        | ~ cc(VAR_1)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( VAR_2 = VAR_1
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_2)
        | ~ rr(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( cd(sK1(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( rr(VAR_0,sK1(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( cc(sK0(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( rr(VAR_0,sK0(VAR_0))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2_sk]) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    ( rr(A,sK0(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    ( cc(sK0(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    ( rr(A,sK1(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    ( cd(sK1(A))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    ( C = B
    | ~ rr(A,C)
    | ~ rr(A,B)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    ( cdxcomp(A)
    | ~ cc(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_3]) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    ( ~ ra_Px1(A,B)
    | ~ cd(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_4]) ).

fof(nnf_18,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ! [Y0] : ~ ra_Px1(X,Y0)
        | cdxcomp(X) )
      & ( ? [X4] : ra_Px1(X,X4)
        | ~ cdxcomp(X) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_5_sk,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ! [Y0] : ~ ra_Px1(X,Y0)
        | cdxcomp(X) )
      & ( ra_Px1(X,sK2(X))
        | ~ cdxcomp(X) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(X4,sK2(X))],[nnf_18]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_5,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ ra_Px1(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | cdxcomp(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ra_Px1(VAR_0,sK2(VAR_0))
        | ~ cdxcomp(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_5_sk]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    ( ra_Px1(A,sK2(A))
    | ~ cdxcomp(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_5]) ).

fof(axiom_6,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).

cnf(c_48,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_6]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    cd(sK1(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_38]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    rr(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794,sK1(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_37]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    cc(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_36]) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    rr(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794,sK0(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_62,plain,
    ~ ra_Px1(sK1(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794),A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    cdxcomp(sK0(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_43]) ).

cnf(c_69,plain,
    ~ cdxcomp(sK1(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_62]) ).

cnf(c_76,plain,
    ( cdxcomp(A)
    | A != sK0(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_63]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    sK1(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794) != sK0(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_69]) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    ( B = A
    | ~ rr(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794,B)
    | ~ rr(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_48]) ).

cnf(c_78,plain,
    ( sK1(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794) = A
    | ~ rr(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_79,plain,
    ~ rr(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794,sK0(i2003_11_14_17_22_27794)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_71]) ).

cnf(c_75,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_79]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KRS127+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:38:41 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.38  % Process 1701609 was started by sandbox2 on n007,
% 0.09/0.38  % Fri Sep 25 19:38:41 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.39  
% 0.09/0.39  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.09/0.40  % Length of proof is 24.
% 0.09/0.40  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.09/0.40  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.09/0.40  % Given clauses 42.
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------