↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : KRS128+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:36:24 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.27s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   88 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   30 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  110 (  45   ~;  44   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   2 sgn  18   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_9,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ca_Cx4xcomp(X1)
    <=> ~ ? [X2] : ra_Px4(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_9) ).

fof(axiom_8,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ca_Cx4(X1)
    <=> ? [X3] : ra_Px4(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_8) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    <=> ( ? [X2] :
            ( rr(X1,X2)
            & cexcomp(X2) )
        & ! [X2] :
            ( rr(X1,X2)
           => cd(X2) )
        & ! [X2] :
            ( rr(X1,X2)
           => ca_Cx4(X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_10,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ca_Cx4xcomp(X1)
    <=> ( cd(X1)
        & cexcomp(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_10) ).

fof(axiom_11,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_31584),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_11) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X55,X56,X57] :
      ( ( ~ ca_Cx4xcomp(X55)
        | ~ ra_Px4(X55,X56) )
      & ( ra_Px4(X57,esk9_1(X57))
        | ca_Cx4xcomp(X57) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_9])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X51,X53,X54] :
      ( ( ~ ca_Cx4(X51)
        | ra_Px4(X51,esk8_1(X51)) )
      & ( ~ ra_Px4(X53,X54)
        | ca_Cx4(X53) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_8])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X26,X28,X29,X30,X31] :
      ( ( rr(X26,esk1_1(X26))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X26) )
      & ( cexcomp(esk1_1(X26))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X26) )
      & ( ~ rr(X26,X28)
        | cd(X28)
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X26) )
      & ( ~ rr(X26,X29)
        | ca_Cx4(X29)
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X26) )
      & ( rr(X30,esk3_1(X30))
        | rr(X30,esk2_1(X30))
        | ~ rr(X30,X31)
        | ~ cexcomp(X31)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X30) )
      & ( ~ ca_Cx4(esk3_1(X30))
        | rr(X30,esk2_1(X30))
        | ~ rr(X30,X31)
        | ~ cexcomp(X31)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X30) )
      & ( rr(X30,esk3_1(X30))
        | ~ cd(esk2_1(X30))
        | ~ rr(X30,X31)
        | ~ cexcomp(X31)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X30) )
      & ( ~ ca_Cx4(esk3_1(X30))
        | ~ cd(esk2_1(X30))
        | ~ rr(X30,X31)
        | ~ cexcomp(X31)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X30) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Cx4xcomp(X1)
    | ~ ra_Px4(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ra_Px4(X1,esk8_1(X1))
    | ~ ca_Cx4(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ca_Cx4(X2)
    | ~ rr(X1,X2)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( rr(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Cx4xcomp(X1)
    | ~ ca_Cx4(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ca_Cx4(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X59] :
      ( ( cd(X59)
        | ~ ca_Cx4xcomp(X59) )
      & ( cexcomp(X59)
        | ~ ca_Cx4xcomp(X59) )
      & ( ~ cd(X59)
        | ~ cexcomp(X59)
        | ca_Cx4xcomp(X59) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_10])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( cd(X2)
    | ~ rr(X1,X2)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Cx4xcomp(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ca_Cx4xcomp(X1)
    | ~ cd(X1)
    | ~ cexcomp(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( cexcomp(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( cd(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_31584),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : KRS128+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:37:44 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.72  % Total time : 1.373s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------