↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : KRS128+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:42 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.48s 2.37s
% Output   : Refutation 3.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  181 (  14   ~;   0   |;  23   &; 109   @)
%                                         (   9 <=>;  26  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   18 (  17 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0   ^;  28   !;  21   ?;  49   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(cowlThing_decl,type,
    cowlThing: $i > $o ).

thf(cowlNothing_decl,type,
    cowlNothing: $i > $o ).

thf(xsd_string_decl,type,
    xsd_string: $i > $o ).

thf(xsd_integer_decl,type,
    xsd_integer: $i > $o ).

thf(cUnsatisfiable_decl,type,
    cUnsatisfiable: $i > $o ).

thf(rr_decl,type,
    rr: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(cexcomp_decl,type,
    cexcomp: $i > $o ).

thf(cd_decl,type,
    cd: $i > $o ).

thf(ca_Cx4_decl,type,
    ca_Cx4: $i > $o ).

thf(cc_decl,type,
    cc: $i > $o ).

thf(cdxcomp_decl,type,
    cdxcomp: $i > $o ).

thf(ra_Px2_decl,type,
    ra_Px2: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(ce_decl,type,
    ce: $i > $o ).

thf(ra_Px1_decl,type,
    ra_Px1: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(ra_Px4_decl,type,
    ra_Px4: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(ca_Cx4xcomp_decl,type,
    ca_Cx4xcomp: $i > $o ).

thf(i2003_11_14_17_22_31584_decl,type,
    i2003_11_14_17_22_31584: $i ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ cUnsatisfiable )
    <=> ( ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ ( A @ rr ) )
           => ( B @ ca_Cx4 ) )
        & ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ ( A @ rr ) )
           => ( B @ cd ) )
        & ? [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ cexcomp )
            & ( B @ ( A @ rr ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ ( A @ rr ) )
             => ( B @ ca_Cx4 ) )
          & ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ ( A @ rr ) )
             => ( B @ cd ) )
          & ? [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ cexcomp )
              & ( B @ ( A @ rr ) ) ) )
       => ( A @ cUnsatisfiable ) )
      & ( ( A @ cUnsatisfiable )
       => ( ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ ( A @ rr ) )
             => ( B @ ca_Cx4 ) )
          & ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ ( A @ rr ) )
             => ( B @ cd ) )
          & ? [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ cexcomp )
              & ( B @ ( A @ rr ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ cexcomp )
    <=> ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_7) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) )
       => ( A @ cexcomp ) )
      & ( ( A @ cexcomp )
       => ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ca_Cx4xcomp )
    <=> ~ ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_9) ).

thf(73,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px4 ) )
       => ( A @ ca_Cx4xcomp ) )
      & ( ( A @ ca_Cx4xcomp )
       => ~ ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ca_Cx4 )
    <=> ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_8) ).

thf(67,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px4 ) )
       => ( A @ ca_Cx4 ) )
      & ( ( A @ ca_Cx4 )
       => ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ cd )
    <=> ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

thf(43,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px2 ) )
       => ( A @ cd ) )
      & ( ( A @ cd )
       => ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ce )
    <=> ~ ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).

thf(55,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) )
       => ( A @ ce ) )
      & ( ( A @ ce )
       => ~ ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ xsd_string )
    <=> ~ ( A @ xsd_integer ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( A @ xsd_integer )
       => ( A @ xsd_string ) )
      & ( ( A @ xsd_string )
       => ~ ( A @ xsd_integer ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ca_Cx4xcomp )
    <=> ( ( A @ cexcomp )
        & ( A @ cd ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_10) ).

thf(79,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A @ cexcomp )
          & ( A @ cd ) )
       => ( A @ ca_Cx4xcomp ) )
      & ( ( A @ ca_Cx4xcomp )
       => ( ( A @ cexcomp )
          & ( A @ cd ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(1,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ cowlNothing )
      & ( A @ cowlThing ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_0) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ cowlNothing )
      & ( A @ cowlThing ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ cc )
     => ( A @ cdxcomp ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ cc )
     => ( A @ cdxcomp ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ cdxcomp )
    <=> ~ ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

thf(49,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px2 ) )
       => ( A @ cdxcomp ) )
      & ( ( A @ cdxcomp )
       => ~ ? [B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ra_Px2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    i2003_11_14_17_22_31584 @ cUnsatisfiable,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_11) ).

thf(86,plain,
    i2003_11_14_17_22_31584 @ cUnsatisfiable,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(87,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[25,61,73,67,43,55,19,79,13,41,49,86]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KRS128+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.39  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:40:49 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.84/0.95  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.21/1.14  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (182ms). 
% 1.21/1.15  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.80/1.55  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.80/1.56  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.99/1.61  % [INFO] 	 12 axioms and no conjecture found. 
% 1.99/1.67  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 1.99/1.68  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.99/1.68  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.48/2.37  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.48/2.37  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.48/2.37  % Time passed: 1837ms (effective reasoning time: 1209ms)
% 3.48/2.37  % Axioms used in derivation (12): axiom_7, axiom_10, axiom_2, axiom_6, axiom_3, axiom_1, axiom_8, axiom_5, axiom_0, axiom_11, axiom_9, axiom_4
% 3.48/2.37  % No. of inferences in proof: 25
% 3.48/2.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1837 ms resp. 1209 ms w/o parsing
% 3.75/2.43  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.75/2.43  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------