%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS135+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:37 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.53s 0.60s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.53s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KRS135+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 14:20:23 EDT 2024 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.49/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.53/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.59 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.53/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.53/0.59 % Transform :cnf % 0.53/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.53/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.53/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.53/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.60 % File : KRS135+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.53/0.60 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web) % 0.53/0.60 % Problem : This is a typical definition of range from description logic % 0.53/0.60 % Version : Especial. % 0.53/0.60 % English : % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.53/0.60 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW % 0.53/0.60 % Source : [Bec03] % 0.53/0.60 % Names : positive_I5.24-Manifest004 [Bec03] % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 % Status : Theorem % 0.53/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.1.0 % 0.53/0.60 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 4 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of atoms : 13 ( 0 equ) % 0.53/0.60 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 3 avg) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of connectives : 13 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 4 &) % 0.53/0.60 % ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.53/0.60 % Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 5 avg) % 0.53/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of variables : 8 ( 8 !; 0 ?) % 0.53/0.60 % SPC : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of % 0.53/0.60 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's % 0.53/0.60 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL. % 0.53/0.60 % : It works both ways. % 0.53/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.60 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.53/0.60 fof(axiom_0,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.60 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.53/0.60 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.53/0.60 fof(axiom_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.60 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.53/0.60 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 %----Super cowlThing % 0.53/0.60 fof(axiom_2,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.60 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.53/0.60 => ! [Y] : % 0.53/0.60 ( rprop(X,Y) % 0.53/0.60 => cA(Y) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.53/0.60 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.53/0.60 %----Range: rprop % 0.53/0.60 fof(the_axiom,conjecture, % 0.53/0.60 ( ! [X] : % 0.53/0.60 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.53/0.60 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) % 0.53/0.60 & ! [X] : % 0.53/0.60 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.53/0.60 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) % 0.53/0.60 & ! [X,Y] : % 0.53/0.60 ( rprop(X,Y) % 0.53/0.60 => cA(Y) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 % Proof found % 0.53/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.53/0.60 % SZS output start Proof % 0.53/0.60 %ClaNum:8(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.53/0.60 %VarNum:8(SingletonVarNum:5) % 0.53/0.60 %MaxLitNum:4 % 0.53/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.53/0.60 %SharedTerms:11 % 0.53/0.60 %goalClause: 4 5 6 7 % 0.53/0.60 [1]~P1(x11) % 0.53/0.60 [2]P4(x21)+P3(x21) % 0.53/0.60 [3]~P4(x31)+~P3(x31) % 0.53/0.60 [8]P2(x81)+~P5(x82,x81) % 0.53/0.60 [4]P1(a1)+P3(a2)+~P4(a2)+~P2(a3) % 0.53/0.60 [5]P1(a1)+P4(a2)+~P3(a2)+~P2(a3) % 0.53/0.60 [6]P1(a1)+P3(a2)+P5(a4,a3)+~P4(a2) % 0.53/0.60 [7]P5(a4,a3)+P1(a1)+P4(a2)+~P3(a2) % 0.53/0.60 %EqnAxiom % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 cnf(14,plain, % 0.53/0.60 (P3(a2)+~P4(a2)+~P2(a3)), % 0.53/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4])). % 0.53/0.60 cnf(15,plain, % 0.53/0.60 (P4(a2)+~P3(a2)+~P2(a3)), % 0.53/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5])). % 0.53/0.60 cnf(16,plain, % 0.53/0.60 (P5(a4,a3)+P3(a2)+~P4(a2)), % 0.53/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6])). % 0.53/0.60 cnf(17,plain, % 0.53/0.60 (P5(a4,a3)+P4(a2)+~P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7])). % 0.53/0.60 cnf(21,plain, % 0.53/0.60 (P2(a3)+P3(a2)+~P4(a2)), % 0.53/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,8])). % 0.53/0.60 cnf(22,plain, % 0.53/0.60 (P3(a2)+~P4(a2)), % 0.53/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[21,14])). % 0.53/0.60 cnf(23,plain, % 0.53/0.60 (~P4(a2)), % 0.53/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[22,3])). % 0.53/0.60 cnf(24,plain, % 0.53/0.60 (~P3(a2)+~P2(a3)), % 0.53/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,15])). % 0.53/0.60 cnf(25,plain, % 0.53/0.60 (P5(a4,a3)+~P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,17])). % 0.53/0.61 cnf(26,plain, % 0.53/0.61 (~P2(a3)), % 0.53/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,24,2])). % 0.53/0.61 cnf(27,plain, % 0.53/0.61 (~P5(x271,a3)), % 0.53/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,8])). % 0.53/0.61 cnf(29,plain, % 0.53/0.61 (~P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,25])). % 0.53/0.61 cnf(31,plain, % 0.53/0.61 ($false), % 0.53/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,29,2]), % 0.53/0.61 ['proof']). % 0.53/0.61 % SZS output end Proof % 0.53/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------