%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS139+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:38 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.49s 0.62s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.49s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.08/0.12 % Problem : KRS139+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.08/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 13:44:24 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.49/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.49/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.49/0.61 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.49/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.49/0.61 % Transform :cnf % 0.49/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.49/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.49/0.61 % 0.49/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.49/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.49/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.49/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.49/0.62 % File : KRS139+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.49/0.62 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web) % 0.49/0.62 % Problem : A Lite version of test SymmetricProperty-001 % 0.49/0.62 % Version : Especial. % 0.49/0.62 % English : % 0.49/0.62 % 0.49/0.62 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.49/0.62 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW % 0.49/0.62 % Source : [Bec03] % 0.49/0.62 % Names : positive_SymmetricProperty-Manifest003 [Bec03] % 0.49/0.62 % 0.49/0.62 % Status : Theorem % 0.49/0.62 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.1.0 % 0.49/0.62 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 3 unt; 0 def) % 0.49/0.62 % Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ) % 0.49/0.62 % Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg) % 0.49/0.62 % Number of connectives : 13 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 6 &) % 0.49/0.62 % ( 2 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.49/0.62 % Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg) % 0.49/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.49/0.62 % Number of predicates : 5 ( 5 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.49/0.62 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.49/0.62 % Number of variables : 6 ( 6 !; 0 ?) % 0.49/0.62 % SPC : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ % 0.49/0.62 % 0.49/0.62 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of % 0.49/0.62 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's % 0.49/0.62 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL. % 0.49/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.49/0.62 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.49/0.62 fof(axiom_0,axiom, % 0.49/0.62 ! [X] : % 0.49/0.62 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.49/0.62 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ). % 0.49/0.62 % 0.49/0.62 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.49/0.62 fof(axiom_1,axiom, % 0.49/0.62 ! [X] : % 0.49/0.62 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.49/0.62 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ). % 0.49/0.62 % 0.49/0.62 %----Symmetric: rpath % 0.49/0.62 fof(axiom_2,axiom, % 0.49/0.62 ! [X,Y] : % 0.49/0.62 ( rpath(X,Y) % 0.49/0.62 => rpath(Y,X) ) ). % 0.49/0.62 % 0.49/0.62 %----iAntwerp % 0.49/0.62 fof(axiom_3,axiom, % 0.49/0.62 cowlThing(iAntwerp) ). % 0.49/0.62 % 0.49/0.62 %----iGhent % 0.49/0.62 fof(axiom_4,axiom, % 0.49/0.62 cowlThing(iGhent) ). % 0.49/0.62 % 0.49/0.62 fof(axiom_5,axiom, % 0.49/0.62 rpath(iGhent,iAntwerp) ). % 0.49/0.62 % 0.49/0.62 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.49/0.62 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.49/0.62 %----iAntwerp % 0.49/0.62 %----iGhent % 0.49/0.62 fof(the_axiom,conjecture, % 0.49/0.62 ( ! [X] : % 0.49/0.62 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.49/0.62 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) % 0.49/0.62 & ! [X] : % 0.49/0.62 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.49/0.62 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) % 0.49/0.62 & cowlThing(iAntwerp) % 0.49/0.62 & rpath(iAntwerp,iGhent) % 0.49/0.62 & cowlThing(iGhent) ) ). % 0.49/0.62 % 0.49/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.49/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.49/0.62 % Proof found % 0.49/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.49/0.62 % SZS output start Proof % 0.49/0.62 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.49/0.62 %VarNum:9(SingletonVarNum:5) % 0.49/0.62 %MaxLitNum:4 % 0.49/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.49/0.62 %SharedTerms:11 % 0.49/0.62 %goalClause: 5 6 % 0.49/0.62 [1]P1(a1,a2) % 0.49/0.62 [2]~P2(x21) % 0.49/0.62 [3]P4(x31)+P3(x31) % 0.49/0.62 [4]~P4(x41)+~P3(x41) % 0.49/0.62 [7]~P1(x72,x71)+P1(x71,x72) % 0.49/0.62 [5]P2(a3)+P3(a4)+~P4(a4)+~P1(a2,a1) % 0.49/0.62 [6]~P1(a2,a1)+P2(a3)+P4(a4)+~P3(a4) % 0.49/0.62 %EqnAxiom % 0.49/0.62 % 0.49/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.49/0.62 cnf(11,plain, % 0.49/0.62 (~P1(a2,a1)+P3(a4)+~P4(a4)), % 0.49/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5])). % 0.49/0.62 cnf(12,plain, % 0.49/0.62 (~P1(a2,a1)+P4(a4)+~P3(a4)), % 0.49/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,6])). % 0.49/0.62 cnf(14,plain, % 0.49/0.62 (P3(a4)+~P4(a4)), % 0.49/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7,11])). % 0.49/0.62 cnf(15,plain, % 0.49/0.62 (~P4(a4)), % 0.49/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[14,4])). % 0.49/0.62 cnf(16,plain, % 0.49/0.62 (~P1(a2,a1)+~P3(a4)), % 0.49/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,12])). % 0.49/0.62 cnf(17,plain, % 0.49/0.62 (~P3(a4)), % 0.49/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,16,7])). % 0.49/0.62 cnf(18,plain, % 0.49/0.62 ($false), % 0.49/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,17,3]), % 0.49/0.62 ['proof']). % 0.49/0.62 % SZS output end Proof % 0.49/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------