↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : KRS140+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:29:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.77s 0.93s
% Output   : Refutation 0.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : KRS140+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 15:21:16 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Tue Jun  7 15:21:16 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 23981.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  7 back subsumes 1.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 29 during input processing: 0 [] {-} cowlThing(ia).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 29 during input processing: 0 [] {-} cowlThing(ib).
% 0.13/0.36  29 back subsumes 2.
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 33 during input processing: 0 [copy,33,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 20
% 0.13/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 25
% 0.13/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 80
% 0.13/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.13/0.39     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.13/0.39     distinct function count: 0
% 0.13/0.39     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.77/0.93  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.77/0.93  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Model 5 [ 1 0 248 ] (0.00 seconds, 23331 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Model 6 [ 1 1 236 ] (0.00 seconds, 38057 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Model 7 [ 1 1 4559 ] (0.00 seconds, 35569 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Model 8 [ 1 0 1339 ] (0.00 seconds, 35140 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Model 9 [ 1 1 3514 ] (0.00 seconds, 40481 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Model 10 [ 1 1 198 ] (0.00 seconds, 47824 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.54 sec ----> 891 [hyper,873,8,868] {-} $F.
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Length of proof is 41.  Level of proof is 16.
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.77/0.93  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.77/0.93  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  3 [] {+} A!=B| -rsymProp(A,C)|rsymProp(B,C).
% 0.77/0.93  4 [] {+} A!=B| -rsymProp(C,A)|rsymProp(C,B).
% 0.77/0.93  7 [] {+} -cowlNothing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  8 [] {+} -xsd_string(A)| -xsd_integer(A).
% 0.77/0.93  9 [] {+} -rsymProp(A,B)|B=ia|B=ib.
% 0.77/0.93  10 [] {+} -rsymProp(A,B)|rsymProp(B,A).
% 0.77/0.93  11 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|rsymProp($c5,$c4)| -rsymProp(ia,A)| -cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  12 [copy,11,unit_del,7] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|rsymProp($c5,$c4)| -rsymProp(ia,A)| -cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  13 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|rsymProp($c4,$c3)| -rsymProp(ia,A)| -cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  14 [copy,13,unit_del,7] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|rsymProp($c4,$c3)| -rsymProp(ia,A)| -cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  15 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -rsymProp($c5,$c3)| -rsymProp(ia,A)| -cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  16 [copy,15,unit_del,7] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -rsymProp($c5,$c3)| -rsymProp(ia,A)| -cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  17 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|rsymProp($c5,$c4)| -rsymProp(ia,A)| -cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  18 [copy,17,unit_del,7] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|rsymProp($c5,$c4)| -rsymProp(ia,A)| -cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  19 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|rsymProp($c4,$c3)| -rsymProp(ia,A)| -cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  20 [copy,19,unit_del,7] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|rsymProp($c4,$c3)| -rsymProp(ia,A)| -cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  21 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -rsymProp($c5,$c3)| -rsymProp(ia,A)| -cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  22 [copy,21,unit_del,7] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -rsymProp($c5,$c3)| -rsymProp(ia,A)| -cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  29 [] {+} cowlThing(A).
% 0.77/0.93  30 [] {+} xsd_string(A)|xsd_integer(A).
% 0.77/0.93  31 [] {+} rsymProp(ia,ia).
% 0.77/0.93  32 [] {+} rsymProp(ib,ib).
% 0.77/0.93  34 [hyper,30,20,29,31,29,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2)|rsymProp($c4,$c3).
% 0.77/0.93  35 [hyper,30,18,29,31,29,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2)|rsymProp($c5,$c4).
% 0.77/0.93  36 [hyper,34,14,29,31,29,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp($c4,$c3)|xsd_string($c2).
% 0.77/0.93  43 [hyper,35,12,29,31,29,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp($c5,$c4)|xsd_string($c2).
% 0.77/0.93  51 [hyper,36,8,34,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp($c4,$c3).
% 0.77/0.93  53 [hyper,51,9,flip.1,flip.2] {+} ia=$c3|ib=$c3.
% 0.77/0.93  54 [para_into,51.1.1,9.3.1,flip.3] {+} rsymProp(ib,$c3)| -rsymProp(A,$c4)|ia=$c4.
% 0.77/0.93  55 [para_into,51.1.1,9.2.1,flip.3] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c3)| -rsymProp(A,$c4)|ib=$c4.
% 0.77/0.93  63 [hyper,43,8,35,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp($c5,$c4).
% 0.77/0.93  64 [hyper,63,10] {+} rsymProp($c4,$c5).
% 0.77/0.93  66 [para_into,63.1.1,9.2.1,flip.3] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c4)| -rsymProp(A,$c5)|ib=$c5.
% 0.77/0.93  69 [hyper,64,9,flip.1,flip.2] {-} ia=$c5|ib=$c5.
% 0.77/0.93  75 [hyper,53,4,31] {-} ib=$c3|rsymProp(ia,$c3).
% 0.77/0.93  78 [hyper,53,4,32] {-} ia=$c3|rsymProp(ib,$c3).
% 0.77/0.93  91 [hyper,54,63] {+} rsymProp(ib,$c3)|ia=$c4.
% 0.77/0.93  105 [hyper,55,63] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c3)|ib=$c4.
% 0.77/0.93  158 [hyper,69,4,31] {-} ib=$c5|rsymProp(ia,$c5).
% 0.77/0.93  183 [hyper,158,3,69,factor_simp] {+} ib=$c5|rsymProp($c5,$c5).
% 0.77/0.93  271 [para_into,91.2.1,78.1.1,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp(ib,$c3)|$c4=$c3.
% 0.77/0.93  273 [para_from,91.2.1,31.1.2] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c4)|rsymProp(ib,$c3).
% 0.77/0.93  298 [para_into,105.2.1,75.1.1,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c3)|$c4=$c3.
% 0.77/0.93  318 [hyper,66,183,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c4)|ib=$c5.
% 0.77/0.93  417 [para_from,271.2.1,63.1.2] {+} rsymProp($c5,$c3)|rsymProp(ib,$c3).
% 0.77/0.93  432 [para_from,298.2.1,63.1.2] {+} rsymProp($c5,$c3)|rsymProp(ia,$c3).
% 0.77/0.93  462 [para_from,318.2.1,273.2.1,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c4)|rsymProp($c5,$c3).
% 0.77/0.93  586 [hyper,417,3,69,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp($c5,$c3)|ia=$c5.
% 0.77/0.93  665 [hyper,432,22,29,30,31,29,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c3)|xsd_integer($c2).
% 0.77/0.93  673 [hyper,665,16,29,432,31,29,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c3)|xsd_string($c2).
% 0.77/0.93  677 [hyper,673,8,665,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c3).
% 0.77/0.93  773 [hyper,462,22,29,30,677,29,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c4)|xsd_integer($c2).
% 0.77/0.93  775 [hyper,773,16,29,462,677,29,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c4)|xsd_string($c2).
% 0.77/0.93  779 [hyper,775,8,773,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp(ia,$c4).
% 0.77/0.93  865 [para_from,586.2.1,677.1.1,factor_simp] {+} rsymProp($c5,$c3).
% 0.77/0.93  868 [hyper,865,22,29,30,779,29,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2).
% 0.77/0.93  873 [hyper,868,16,29,865,779,29] {+} xsd_string($c2).
% 0.77/0.93  891 [hyper,873,8,868] {-} $F.
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.77/0.93  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  ============ end of search ============
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  true clauses given         118      (83.1%)
% 0.77/0.93  false clauses given         24
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.77/0.93     3  0         1
% 0.77/0.93     6  0         1
% 0.77/0.93     7  0         4
% 0.77/0.93     8  0         2
% 0.77/0.93     9  4         24
% 0.77/0.93    10  0         51
% 0.77/0.93    12  0         11
% 0.77/0.93    13  0         8
% 0.77/0.93    16  0         4
% 0.77/0.93    19  0         4
% 0.77/0.93  tot:  4         110      (96.5% true)
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Model 10 [ 1 1 198 ] (0.00 seconds, 47824 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.77/0.93  
% 0.77/0.93  Process 23981 finished Tue Jun  7 15:21:17 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------