%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS148+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:01:02 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.11s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 112 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 137 ( 56 ~; 45 |; 29 &)
% ( 7 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 2 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(the_axiom,conjecture,
( cC140(iV5475)
& cC116(iV5475)
& cowlThing(iV5475)
& cC138(iV5475)
& ! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( ~ cowlNothing(X1)
& cowlThing(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',the_axiom) ).
fof(axiom_0,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ~ cowlNothing(X1)
& cowlThing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_0) ).
fof(axiom_71,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cTEST(X1)
<=> ( cC116(X1)
& cC140(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_71) ).
fof(axiom_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).
fof(axiom_72,axiom,
cTEST(iV5475),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_72) ).
fof(axiom_25,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cC140(X1)
<=> ( cC138(X1)
& cTOP(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_25) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ( cC140(iV5475)
& cC116(iV5475)
& cowlThing(iV5475)
& cC138(iV5475)
& ! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( ~ cowlNothing(X1)
& cowlThing(X1) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[the_axiom]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ( cC140(iV5475)
& cC116(iV5475)
& cowlThing(iV5475)
& cC138(iV5475)
& ! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( ~ cowlNothing(X1)
& cowlThing(X1) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ cowlNothing(X1)
& cowlThing(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_0]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X6] :
( ( cTEST(X6)
| ~ cC116(X6)
| ~ cC140(X6) )
& ( ~ cTEST(X6)
| cC116(X6) )
& ( ~ cTEST(X6)
| cC140(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_71])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ cC140(iV5475)
| ~ cC116(iV5475)
| ~ cowlThing(iV5475)
| ~ cC138(iV5475)
| cowlNothing(esk1_0)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0)
| xsd_string(esk2_0) )
& ( ~ cC140(iV5475)
| ~ cC116(iV5475)
| ~ cowlThing(iV5475)
| ~ cC138(iV5475)
| cowlNothing(esk1_0)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| xsd_integer(esk2_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk2_0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X13] :
( ~ cowlNothing(X13)
& cowlThing(X13) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ cTEST(X1)
| cC116(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
cTEST(iV5475),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_72]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ cTEST(X1)
| cC140(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X12] :
( ( xsd_string(X12)
| xsd_integer(X12) )
& ( ~ xsd_integer(X12)
| ~ xsd_string(X12) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cC140(iV5475)
| ~ cC116(iV5475)
| ~ cowlThing(iV5475)
| ~ cC138(iV5475)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0)
| cowlNothing(esk1_0)
| xsd_string(esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
cowlThing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
cC116(iV5475),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
cC140(iV5475),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cC140(iV5475)
| ~ cC116(iV5475)
| ~ cowlThing(iV5475)
| ~ cC138(iV5475)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk2_0)
| cowlNothing(esk1_0)
| xsd_integer(esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cC138(iV5475)
| xsd_string(esk2_0) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cC138(iV5475)
| xsd_integer(esk2_0) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_18]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_21]),c_0_24]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X5] :
( ( cC140(X5)
| ~ cC138(X5)
| ~ cTOP(X5) )
& ( ~ cC140(X5)
| cC138(X5) )
& ( ~ cC140(X5)
| cTOP(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_25])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ cC138(iV5475),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ cC140(X1)
| cC138(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS148+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:56:31 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 2802786 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2802789 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 90
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 71
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses : 38
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 38
% 0.11/0.45 % Processed clauses : 56
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 55
% 0.11/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Generated clauses : 35
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19
% 0.11/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.11/0.45 % Paramodulations : 35
% 0.11/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 15
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of those cached : 10
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 51
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 42
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.11/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.11/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 294
% 0.11/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 271
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.11/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.11/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3209
% 0.11/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 862
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3928 pages
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------