%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS152+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:41 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.53s 0.62s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.53s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : KRS152+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 12:37:39 EDT 2024 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.53/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.61 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.53/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.53/0.61 % Transform :cnf % 0.53/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.53/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.53/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.53/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.61 % File : KRS152+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.53/0.61 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web) % 0.53/0.61 % Problem : DL Test: k_ph ABox test from DL98 systems comparison % 0.53/0.61 % Version : Especial. % 0.53/0.61 % English : % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.53/0.61 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW % 0.53/0.61 % Source : [Bec03] % 0.53/0.61 % Names : positive_description-logic-Manifest207 [Bec03] % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 % Status : Theorem % 0.53/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0 % 0.53/0.61 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 8 unt; 0 def) % 0.53/0.61 % Number of atoms : 37 ( 0 equ) % 0.53/0.61 % Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg) % 0.53/0.61 % Number of connectives : 29 ( 9 ~; 0 |; 12 &) % 0.53/0.61 % ( 7 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.53/0.61 % Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg) % 0.53/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.53/0.61 % Number of predicates : 12 ( 12 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.53/0.61 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.53/0.61 % Number of variables : 12 ( 10 !; 2 ?) % 0.53/0.61 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of % 0.53/0.61 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's % 0.53/0.61 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL. % 0.53/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.61 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_0,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.61 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.53/0.61 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.61 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.53/0.61 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----Equality cC10 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_2,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.61 ( cC10(X) % 0.53/0.61 <=> ( cC2(X) % 0.53/0.61 & cC4(X) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----Equality cC12 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_3,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.61 ( cC12(X) % 0.53/0.61 <=> ? [Y] : % 0.53/0.61 ( rR1(X,Y) % 0.53/0.61 & cC10(Y) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----Equality cC6 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_4,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.61 ( cC6(X) % 0.53/0.61 <=> ( ~ cC2(X) % 0.53/0.61 & cC4(X) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----Equality cC8 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_5,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.61 ( cC8(X) % 0.53/0.61 <=> ? [Y] : % 0.53/0.61 ( rR1(X,Y) % 0.53/0.61 & cC6(Y) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----Equality cTEST % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_6,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.61 ( cTEST(X) % 0.53/0.61 <=> ( cC12(X) % 0.53/0.61 & ~ cC8(X) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----iV21080 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_7,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 cTEST(iV21080) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----iV21080 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_8,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 cowlThing(iV21080) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----iV21080 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_9,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.61 ( rR1(iV21080,X) % 0.53/0.61 => ~ cC6(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----iV21080 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_10,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 ~ cC8(iV21080) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_11,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 rR1(iV21080,iV21081) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----iV21081 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_12,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 ~ cC6(iV21081) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----iV21081 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_13,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 cowlThing(iV21081) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----iV21081 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_14,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 cC2(iV21081) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----iV21081 % 0.53/0.61 fof(axiom_15,axiom, % 0.53/0.61 cC4(iV21081) ). % 0.53/0.61 % 0.53/0.61 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.53/0.61 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.53/0.61 %----iV21080 % 0.53/0.61 %----iV21080 % 0.53/0.61 %----iV21081 % 0.53/0.61 %----iV21081 % 0.53/0.61 fof(the_axiom,conjecture, % 0.53/0.61 ( ! [X] : % 0.53/0.61 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.53/0.61 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) % 0.53/0.61 & ! [X] : % 0.53/0.61 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.53/0.61 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) % 0.53/0.61 & cowlThing(iV21080) % 0.53/0.61 & cC12(iV21080) % 0.53/0.61 & cC10(iV21081) % 0.53/0.61 & cowlThing(iV21081) ) ). % 0.53/0.62 % 0.53/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.62 % Proof found % 0.53/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.53/0.62 % SZS output start Proof % 0.53/0.62 %ClaNum:27(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.53/0.62 %VarNum:46(SingletonVarNum:21) % 0.53/0.62 %MaxLitNum:5 % 0.53/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.53/0.62 %SharedTerms:17 % 0.53/0.62 %goalClause: 21 22 % 0.53/0.62 [1]P1(a1) % 0.53/0.62 [2]P4(a1) % 0.53/0.62 [3]P5(a2) % 0.53/0.62 [4]P8(a2,a1) % 0.53/0.62 [5]~P6(a1) % 0.53/0.62 [6]~P7(a2) % 0.53/0.62 [7]~P9(x71) % 0.53/0.62 [8]P11(x81)+P10(x81) % 0.53/0.62 [9]~P2(x91)+P1(x91) % 0.53/0.62 [10]~P2(x101)+P4(x101) % 0.53/0.62 [11]~P6(x111)+P4(x111) % 0.53/0.62 [12]~P5(x121)+P3(x121) % 0.53/0.62 [13]~P11(x131)+~P10(x131) % 0.53/0.62 [14]~P6(x141)+~P1(x141) % 0.53/0.62 [15]~P5(x151)+~P7(x151) % 0.53/0.62 [23]~P6(x231)+~P8(a2,x231) % 0.53/0.62 [18]~P3(x181)+P2(f3(x181)) % 0.53/0.62 [19]~P7(x191)+P6(f4(x191)) % 0.53/0.62 [24]~P3(x241)+P8(x241,f3(x241)) % 0.53/0.62 [25]~P7(x251)+P8(x251,f4(x251)) % 0.53/0.62 [16]P6(x161)+~P4(x161)+P1(x161) % 0.53/0.62 [17]P5(x171)+~P3(x171)+P7(x171) % 0.53/0.62 [20]~P1(x201)+~P4(x201)+P2(x201) % 0.53/0.62 [26]~P8(x261,x262)+P3(x261)+~P2(x262) % 0.53/0.62 [27]~P8(x271,x272)+P7(x271)+~P6(x272) % 0.53/0.62 [21]P9(a5)+P10(a6)+~P11(a6)+~P2(a1)+~P3(a2) % 0.53/0.62 [22]P9(a5)+P11(a6)+~P10(a6)+~P2(a1)+~P3(a2) % 0.53/0.62 %EqnAxiom % 0.53/0.62 % 0.53/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.62 cnf(28,plain, % 0.53/0.62 (P2(a1)), % 0.53/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,20])). % 0.53/0.62 cnf(33,plain, % 0.53/0.62 (P10(a6)+~P11(a6)+~P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[7,28,21])). % 0.53/0.62 cnf(34,plain, % 0.53/0.62 (P11(a6)+~P10(a6)+~P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[7,28,22])). % 0.53/0.62 cnf(42,plain, % 0.53/0.62 (~P11(a6)+~P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,13])). % 0.53/0.62 cnf(43,plain, % 0.53/0.62 (P10(a6)+~P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[42,8])). % 0.53/0.62 cnf(44,plain, % 0.53/0.62 (P11(a6)+~P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[43,34])). % 0.53/0.62 cnf(45,plain, % 0.53/0.62 (~P10(a6)+~P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[44,13])). % 0.53/0.62 cnf(46,plain, % 0.53/0.62 (~P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[45,43])). % 0.53/0.62 cnf(47,plain, % 0.53/0.62 ($false), % 0.53/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[46,3,12]), % 0.53/0.62 ['proof']). % 0.53/0.62 % SZS output end Proof % 0.53/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------