%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS152+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:01:02 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 125 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 150 ( 61 ~; 51 |; 30 &)
% ( 8 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 10 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 2 sgn 17 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(the_axiom,conjecture,
( cowlThing(iV21081)
& cC10(iV21081)
& cC12(iV21080)
& cowlThing(iV21080)
& ! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( ~ cowlNothing(X1)
& cowlThing(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',the_axiom) ).
fof(axiom_0,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ~ cowlNothing(X1)
& cowlThing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_0) ).
fof(axiom_6,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cTEST(X1)
<=> ( ~ cC8(X1)
& cC12(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cC10(X1)
<=> ( cC4(X1)
& cC2(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).
fof(axiom_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).
fof(axiom_15,axiom,
cC4(iV21081),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_15) ).
fof(axiom_14,axiom,
cC2(iV21081),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_14) ).
fof(axiom_7,axiom,
cTEST(iV21080),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_7) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( cowlThing(iV21081)
& cC10(iV21081)
& cC12(iV21080)
& cowlThing(iV21080)
& ! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( ~ cowlNothing(X1)
& cowlThing(X1) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[the_axiom]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( cowlThing(iV21081)
& cC10(iV21081)
& cC12(iV21080)
& cowlThing(iV21080)
& ! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( ~ cowlNothing(X1)
& cowlThing(X1) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ cowlNothing(X1)
& cowlThing(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_0]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X1] :
( cTEST(X1)
<=> ( ~ cC8(X1)
& cC12(X1) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_6]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ cowlThing(iV21081)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21080)
| cowlNothing(esk3_0)
| ~ cowlThing(esk3_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk4_0)
| xsd_string(esk4_0) )
& ( ~ cowlThing(iV21081)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21080)
| cowlNothing(esk3_0)
| ~ cowlThing(esk3_0)
| xsd_integer(esk4_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk4_0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X3] :
( ~ cowlNothing(X3)
& cowlThing(X3) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X5] :
( ( cC10(X5)
| ~ cC4(X5)
| ~ cC2(X5) )
& ( ~ cC10(X5)
| cC4(X5) )
& ( ~ cC10(X5)
| cC2(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X15] :
( ( cTEST(X15)
| cC8(X15)
| ~ cC12(X15) )
& ( ~ cTEST(X15)
| ~ cC8(X15) )
& ( ~ cTEST(X15)
| cC12(X15) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cowlThing(iV21081)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21080)
| ~ cowlThing(esk3_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk4_0)
| cowlNothing(esk3_0)
| xsd_string(esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
cowlThing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ cC4(X1)
| ~ cC2(X1)
| cC10(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
cC4(iV21081),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
cC2(iV21081),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ cTEST(X1)
| cC12(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
cTEST(iV21080),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_7]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X4] :
( ( xsd_string(X4)
| xsd_integer(X4) )
& ( ~ xsd_integer(X4)
| ~ xsd_string(X4) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cowlThing(iV21081)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21080)
| ~ cowlThing(esk3_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk4_0)
| cowlNothing(esk3_0)
| xsd_integer(esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk4_0)
| xsd_string(esk4_0)
| cowlNothing(esk3_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_18]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
cC10(iV21081),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
cC12(iV21080),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ xsd_string(esk4_0)
| xsd_integer(esk4_0)
| cowlNothing(esk3_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_18]),c_0_18]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
xsd_string(esk4_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
xsd_integer(esk4_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_32])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS152+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:55:13 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 234422 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 234426 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 17
% 0.12/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Initial clauses : 30
% 0.12/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.12/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 27
% 0.12/0.44 % Processed clauses : 41
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % ...subsumed : 8
% 0.12/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 33
% 0.12/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Generated clauses : 24
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.12/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.12/0.44 % Paramodulations : 24
% 0.12/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 11
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of those cached : 7
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 33
% 0.12/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.12/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.12/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 116
% 0.12/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 105
% 0.12/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.12/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 0.12/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1734
% 0.12/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 327
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.44 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44 % User time : 0.014 s
% 0.12/0.44 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------