%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KRS152+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:55:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.44s 2.32s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 11 unt; 6 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 61 ( 0 equ; 36 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk3_0)
| xsd_integer(esk4_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk4_0)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cC12(iV21080) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6xdoon31/lgb.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6xdoon31/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk3_0)
| xsd_string(esk4_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk4_0)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cC12(iV21080) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6xdoon31/lgb.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( ~ xsd_string(X1)
| ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6xdoon31/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6xdoon31/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_19,plain,
( cC12(X1)
| ~ cTEST(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6xdoon31/lgb.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_20,plain,
cTEST(iV21080),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6xdoon31/lgb.p',i_0_20) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
( cC10(X1)
| ~ cC2(X1)
| ~ cC4(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6xdoon31/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_27,plain,
cC2(iV21081),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6xdoon31/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(i_0_28,plain,
cC4(iV21081),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6xdoon31/lgb.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk3_0)
| xsd_integer(esk4_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk4_0)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cC12(iV21080) ),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk3_0)
| xsd_string(esk4_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk4_0)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cC12(iV21080) ),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( ~ xsd_string(X1)
| ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( xsd_integer(esk4_0)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ xsd_string(esk4_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk4_0) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_42]),c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ xsd_string(esk4_0) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( cC12(X1)
| ~ cTEST(X1) ),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
cTEST(iV21080),
i_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
cC12(iV21080),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( cC10(X1)
| ~ cC2(X1)
| ~ cC4(X1) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
cC2(iV21081),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
cC4(iV21081),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
~ cC10(iV21081),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52])]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_55])]),c_0_56]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : KRS152+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 09:18:48 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.44/2.32 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.44/2.32 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.44/2.32 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.44/2.32 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni
% 7.44/2.32 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.44/2.32 #
% 7.44/2.32 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.44/2.32 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.44/2.32
% 7.44/2.32 # Proof found!
% 7.44/2.32 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.44/2.32 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.44/2.32 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.44/2.32
% 7.44/2.32 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.44/2.32 # User time : 0.023 s
% 7.44/2.32 # System time : 0.008 s
% 7.44/2.32 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 7.44/2.32 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.44/2.32
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------