↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : KRS167+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:01:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   55 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  214 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   24 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  257 (  98   ~; 119   |;  28   &)
%                                         (  10 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   73 (   8 sgn  31   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(the_axiom,conjecture,
    ( ! [X4] :
        ( cc1(X4)
      <=> cc2(X4) )
    & ! [X4] :
        ( xsd_string(X4)
      <=> ~ xsd_integer(X4) )
    & ! [X4] :
        ( ~ cowlNothing(X4)
        & cowlThing(X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',the_axiom) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( cc1(X4)
    <=> ( ! [X5,X6] :
            ( ( rp(X4,X6)
              & rp(X4,X5) )
           => X5 = X6 )
        & ? [X5] : rp(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( cc2(X4)
    <=> ( ! [X5,X6] :
            ( ( rp(X4,X6)
              & rp(X4,X5) )
           => X5 = X6 )
        & ? [X5] : rp(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(axiom_0,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ cowlNothing(X4)
      & cowlThing(X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_0) ).

fof(axiom_1,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( xsd_string(X4)
    <=> ~ xsd_integer(X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X4] :
          ( cc1(X4)
        <=> cc2(X4) )
      & ! [X4] :
          ( xsd_string(X4)
        <=> ~ xsd_integer(X4) )
      & ! [X4] :
          ( ~ cowlNothing(X4)
          & cowlThing(X4) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[the_axiom]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X22,X24,X25,X26,X27] :
      ( ( cc1(X26)
        | ~ rp(X26,X27)
        | esk8_1(X26) != esk9_1(X26) )
      & ( cc1(X26)
        | ~ rp(X26,X27)
        | rp(X26,esk9_1(X26)) )
      & ( cc1(X26)
        | ~ rp(X26,X27)
        | rp(X26,esk8_1(X26)) )
      & ( ~ cc1(X22)
        | X24 = X25
        | ~ rp(X22,X25)
        | ~ rp(X22,X24) )
      & ( ~ cc1(X22)
        | rp(X22,esk7_1(X22)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X12,X14,X15,X16,X17] :
      ( ( cc2(X16)
        | ~ rp(X16,X17)
        | esk5_1(X16) != esk6_1(X16) )
      & ( cc2(X16)
        | ~ rp(X16,X17)
        | rp(X16,esk6_1(X16)) )
      & ( cc2(X16)
        | ~ rp(X16,X17)
        | rp(X16,esk5_1(X16)) )
      & ( ~ cc2(X12)
        | X14 = X15
        | ~ rp(X12,X15)
        | ~ rp(X12,X14) )
      & ( ~ cc2(X12)
        | rp(X12,esk4_1(X12)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X4] :
          ( cc1(X4)
        <=> cc2(X4) )
      & ! [X4] :
          ( xsd_string(X4)
        <=> ~ xsd_integer(X4) )
      & ! [X4] :
          ( ~ cowlNothing(X4)
          & cowlThing(X4) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ cowlNothing(X4)
      & cowlThing(X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_0]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( xsd_string(X4)
    <=> ~ xsd_integer(X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ cc1(X1)
    | ~ rp(X1,X3)
    | ~ rp(X1,X2)
    | X2 = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ cc1(X1)
    | rp(X1,esk7_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ rp(X1,X2)
    | cc2(X1)
    | rp(X1,esk6_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ rp(X1,X2)
    | cc2(X1)
    | rp(X1,esk5_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cowlNothing(esk1_0)
      | ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
      | ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0)
      | xsd_string(esk2_0)
      | cc2(esk3_0)
      | cc1(esk3_0) )
    & ( cowlNothing(esk1_0)
      | ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
      | ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0)
      | xsd_string(esk2_0)
      | ~ cc2(esk3_0)
      | ~ cc1(esk3_0) )
    & ( cowlNothing(esk1_0)
      | ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
      | xsd_integer(esk2_0)
      | ~ xsd_string(esk2_0)
      | cc2(esk3_0)
      | cc1(esk3_0) )
    & ( cowlNothing(esk1_0)
      | ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
      | xsd_integer(esk2_0)
      | ~ xsd_string(esk2_0)
      | ~ cc2(esk3_0)
      | ~ cc1(esk3_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X37] :
      ( ~ cowlNothing(X37)
      & cowlThing(X37) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X32] :
      ( ( xsd_string(X32)
        | xsd_integer(X32) )
      & ( ~ xsd_integer(X32)
        | ~ xsd_string(X32) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ cc1(X2)
    | ~ rp(X2,X1)
    | X1 = esk7_1(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ cc1(X1)
    | cc2(X1)
    | rp(X1,esk6_1(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ cc1(X1)
    | cc2(X1)
    | rp(X1,esk5_1(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ rp(X1,X2)
    | esk5_1(X1) != esk6_1(X1)
    | cc2(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
    | ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0)
    | cowlNothing(esk1_0)
    | xsd_string(esk2_0)
    | cc2(esk3_0)
    | cc1(esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    cowlThing(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ~ cowlNothing(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( xsd_string(X1)
    | xsd_integer(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
    | ~ xsd_string(esk2_0)
    | cowlNothing(esk1_0)
    | xsd_integer(esk2_0)
    | cc2(esk3_0)
    | cc1(esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ cc1(X1)
    | cc2(X1)
    | esk7_1(X1) = esk6_1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ cc1(X1)
    | cc2(X1)
    | esk7_1(X1) = esk5_1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ cc1(X1)
    | esk6_1(X1) != esk5_1(X1)
    | cc2(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ rp(X1,X2)
    | cc1(X1)
    | rp(X1,esk8_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ cc2(X1)
    | rp(X1,esk4_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
    | ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( cc1(esk3_0)
    | cc2(esk3_0)
    | xsd_string(esk2_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( cc1(esk3_0)
    | cc2(esk3_0)
    | xsd_integer(esk2_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_23])]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
    | ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0)
    | ~ cc2(esk3_0)
    | ~ cc1(esk3_0)
    | cowlNothing(esk1_0)
    | xsd_string(esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ cc1(X1)
    | cc2(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ cc2(X1)
    | ~ rp(X1,X3)
    | ~ rp(X1,X2)
    | X2 = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ rp(X1,X2)
    | cc1(X1)
    | rp(X1,esk9_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ cc2(X1)
    | cc1(X1)
    | rp(X1,esk8_1(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
    | ~ xsd_string(esk2_0)
    | ~ cc2(esk3_0)
    | ~ cc1(esk3_0)
    | cowlNothing(esk1_0)
    | xsd_integer(esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( cc1(esk3_0)
    | cc2(esk3_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ cc1(esk3_0)
    | xsd_string(esk2_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_23])]),c_0_24]),c_0_36]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ cc2(X2)
    | ~ rp(X2,X1)
    | X1 = esk4_1(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ cc2(X1)
    | cc1(X1)
    | rp(X1,esk9_1(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ rp(X1,X2)
    | esk8_1(X1) != esk9_1(X1)
    | cc1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ cc1(esk3_0)
    | ~ cc2(esk3_0)
    | xsd_integer(esk2_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_23])]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    cc2(esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ cc1(esk3_0)
    | ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ cc2(X1)
    | cc1(X1)
    | esk4_1(X1) = esk9_1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( ~ cc2(X1)
    | cc1(X1)
    | esk4_1(X1) = esk8_1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( ~ cc2(X1)
    | esk9_1(X1) != esk8_1(X1)
    | cc1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cc1(esk3_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47])]),c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ cc2(X1)
    | cc1(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]),c_0_47])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KRS167+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:56:58 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % new_bool_3 with pid 380929 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.13/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.43  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % SubtermCWHack with pid 380933 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.43  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 0.13/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 26
% 0.13/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 0.13/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 18
% 0.13/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 56
% 0.13/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 19
% 0.13/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 37
% 0.13/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 14
% 0.13/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.13/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 69
% 0.13/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 43
% 0.13/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 9
% 0.13/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 69
% 0.13/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 7
% 0.13/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 5
% 0.13/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 21
% 0.13/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.13/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.13/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
% 0.13/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.13/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 12
% 0.13/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 0.13/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 255
% 0.13/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 215
% 0.13/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 40
% 0.13/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.13/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.13/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.13/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2635
% 0.13/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 518
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.43  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.43  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.43  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.13/0.43  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.13/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------