↑ Up

ePrincess---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : KRS168+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:56:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.26s 1.18s
% Output   : Proof 2.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KRS168+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 19:44:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.55/0.58          ____       _                          
% 0.55/0.58    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.55/0.58   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.55/0.58  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.55/0.58  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.55/0.58  
% 0.55/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.55/0.59  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.55/0.59  
% 0.55/0.59  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.55/0.59  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.55/0.59  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.55/0.59  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.55/0.59  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.55/0.59  
% 0.55/0.59  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.55/0.59  
% 0.55/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.75/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.34/0.88  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.50/0.94  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 1.50/0.96  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 1.68/1.04  Prover 0: gave up
% 1.68/1.05  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.68/1.06  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 1.90/1.13  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.26/1.18  Prover 1: proved (130ms)
% 2.26/1.18  
% 2.26/1.18  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 2.26/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.26/1.18  
% 2.26/1.18  Generating proof ... found it (size 40)
% 2.65/1.36  
% 2.65/1.36  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 2.65/1.36  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 2.65/1.36  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ (cB(v5) = v4) |  ~ (cB(v5) = v3)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ (cA(v5) = v4) |  ~ (cA(v5) = v3)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ (xsd_string(v5) = v4) |  ~ (xsd_string(v5) = v3)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ (xsd_integer(v5) = v4) |  ~ (xsd_integer(v5) = v3)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ (cowlNothing(v5) = v4) |  ~ (cowlNothing(v5) = v3)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ (cowlThing(v5) = v4) |  ~ (cowlThing(v5) = v3)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (xsd_string(v3) = v4) | xsd_integer(v3) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (cowlThing(v3) = v4)) &  ! [v3] : ( ~ (xsd_string(v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & xsd_integer(v3) = v4)) &  ! [v3] :  ~ (cowlNothing(v3) = 0) & ((xsd_string(v0) = v1 & xsd_integer(v0) = v2 & ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) &  ~ (v1 = 0)))) | (cowlNothing(v0) = v2 & cowlThing(v0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))))
% 2.81/1.39  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2 yields:
% 2.81/1.39  | (1)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cB(v2) = v1) |  ~ (cB(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cA(v2) = v1) |  ~ (cA(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (xsd_string(v2) = v1) |  ~ (xsd_string(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (xsd_integer(v2) = v1) |  ~ (xsd_integer(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cowlNothing(v2) = v1) |  ~ (cowlNothing(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cowlThing(v2) = v1) |  ~ (cowlThing(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (xsd_string(v0) = v1) | xsd_integer(v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (cowlThing(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (xsd_string(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & xsd_integer(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (cowlNothing(v0) = 0) & ((xsd_string(all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1 & xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0 & ((all_0_0_0 = 0 & all_0_1_1 = 0) | ( ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)))) | (cowlNothing(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0 & cowlThing(all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1 & ( ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) | all_0_0_0 = 0)))
% 2.81/1.39  |
% 2.81/1.39  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 2.81/1.39  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (xsd_string(v0) = v1) | xsd_integer(v0) = 0)
% 2.81/1.39  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (xsd_integer(v2) = v1) |  ~ (xsd_integer(v2) = v0))
% 2.81/1.39  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cB(v2) = v1) |  ~ (cB(v2) = v0))
% 2.81/1.39  | (5)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (xsd_string(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & xsd_integer(v0) = v1))
% 2.81/1.40  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (cowlThing(v0) = v1))
% 2.81/1.40  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cowlNothing(v2) = v1) |  ~ (cowlNothing(v2) = v0))
% 2.81/1.40  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cA(v2) = v1) |  ~ (cA(v2) = v0))
% 2.81/1.40  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ~ (cowlNothing(v0) = 0)
% 2.81/1.40  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cowlThing(v2) = v1) |  ~ (cowlThing(v2) = v0))
% 2.81/1.40  | (11) (xsd_string(all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1 & xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0 & ((all_0_0_0 = 0 & all_0_1_1 = 0) | ( ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)))) | (cowlNothing(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0 & cowlThing(all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1 & ( ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) | all_0_0_0 = 0))
% 2.81/1.40  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (xsd_string(v2) = v1) |  ~ (xsd_string(v2) = v0))
% 2.81/1.40  |
% 2.81/1.40  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (11), into two cases.
% 2.81/1.40  |-Branch one:
% 2.81/1.40  | (13) xsd_string(all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1 & xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0 & ((all_0_0_0 = 0 & all_0_1_1 = 0) | ( ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)))
% 2.81/1.40  |
% 2.81/1.40  	| Applying alpha-rule on (13) yields:
% 2.81/1.40  	| (14) xsd_string(all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1
% 2.81/1.40  	| (15) xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0
% 2.81/1.40  	| (16) (all_0_0_0 = 0 & all_0_1_1 = 0) | ( ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0))
% 2.81/1.40  	|
% 2.81/1.40  	| Instantiating formula (5) with all_0_2_2 yields:
% 2.81/1.40  	| (17)  ~ (xsd_string(all_0_2_2) = 0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 2.81/1.40  	|
% 2.81/1.40  	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms xsd_string(all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 2.81/1.40  	| (18) all_0_1_1 = 0 | xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = 0
% 2.81/1.40  	|
% 2.81/1.40  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (18), into two cases.
% 2.81/1.40  	|-Branch one:
% 2.81/1.40  	| (19) xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = 0
% 2.81/1.40  	|
% 2.81/1.40  		| Instantiating formula (3) with all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 2.81/1.40  		| (20) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 2.81/1.40  		|
% 2.81/1.40  		| From (20) and (15) follows:
% 2.81/1.40  		| (19) xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = 0
% 2.81/1.40  		|
% 2.81/1.40  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (17), into two cases.
% 2.81/1.40  		|-Branch one:
% 2.81/1.40  		| (22)  ~ (xsd_string(all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 2.81/1.40  		|
% 2.81/1.40  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (16), into two cases.
% 2.81/1.40  			|-Branch one:
% 2.81/1.40  			| (23) all_0_0_0 = 0 & all_0_1_1 = 0
% 2.81/1.40  			|
% 2.81/1.40  				| Applying alpha-rule on (23) yields:
% 2.81/1.40  				| (20) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 2.81/1.40  				| (25) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 2.81/1.41  				|
% 2.81/1.41  				| From (25) and (14) follows:
% 2.81/1.41  				| (26) xsd_string(all_0_2_2) = 0
% 2.81/1.41  				|
% 2.81/1.41  				| Using (26) and (22) yields:
% 2.81/1.41  				| (27) $false
% 2.81/1.41  				|
% 2.81/1.41  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 2.81/1.41  			|-Branch two:
% 2.81/1.41  			| (28)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 2.81/1.41  			|
% 2.81/1.41  				| Applying alpha-rule on (28) yields:
% 2.81/1.41  				| (29)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 2.81/1.41  				| (30)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 2.81/1.41  				|
% 2.81/1.41  				| Equations (20) can reduce 29 to:
% 2.81/1.41  				| (31) $false
% 2.81/1.41  				|
% 2.81/1.41  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 2.81/1.41  		|-Branch two:
% 2.81/1.41  		| (26) xsd_string(all_0_2_2) = 0
% 2.81/1.41  		| (33)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 2.81/1.41  		|
% 2.81/1.41  			| Instantiating (33) with all_21_0_3 yields:
% 2.81/1.41  			| (34)  ~ (all_21_0_3 = 0) & xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = all_21_0_3
% 2.81/1.41  			|
% 2.81/1.41  			| Applying alpha-rule on (34) yields:
% 2.81/1.41  			| (35)  ~ (all_21_0_3 = 0)
% 2.81/1.41  			| (36) xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = all_21_0_3
% 2.81/1.41  			|
% 2.81/1.41  			| Instantiating formula (3) with all_0_2_2, all_21_0_3, 0 and discharging atoms xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = all_21_0_3, xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 2.81/1.41  			| (37) all_21_0_3 = 0
% 2.81/1.41  			|
% 2.81/1.41  			| Equations (37) can reduce 35 to:
% 2.81/1.41  			| (31) $false
% 2.81/1.41  			|
% 2.81/1.41  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 2.81/1.41  	|-Branch two:
% 2.81/1.41  	| (39)  ~ (xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 2.81/1.41  	| (25) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 2.81/1.41  	|
% 2.81/1.41  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (16), into two cases.
% 2.81/1.41  		|-Branch one:
% 2.81/1.41  		| (23) all_0_0_0 = 0 & all_0_1_1 = 0
% 2.81/1.41  		|
% 2.81/1.41  			| Applying alpha-rule on (23) yields:
% 2.81/1.41  			| (20) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 2.81/1.41  			| (25) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 2.81/1.41  			|
% 2.81/1.41  			| From (20) and (15) follows:
% 2.81/1.41  			| (19) xsd_integer(all_0_2_2) = 0
% 2.81/1.41  			|
% 2.81/1.41  			| Using (19) and (39) yields:
% 2.81/1.41  			| (27) $false
% 2.81/1.41  			|
% 2.81/1.41  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 2.81/1.41  		|-Branch two:
% 2.81/1.41  		| (28)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 2.81/1.41  		|
% 2.81/1.41  			| Applying alpha-rule on (28) yields:
% 2.81/1.41  			| (29)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 2.81/1.41  			| (30)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 2.81/1.41  			|
% 2.81/1.41  			| Equations (25) can reduce 30 to:
% 2.81/1.41  			| (31) $false
% 2.81/1.41  			|
% 2.81/1.41  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 2.81/1.41  |-Branch two:
% 2.81/1.41  | (50) cowlNothing(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0 & cowlThing(all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1 & ( ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) | all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 2.81/1.41  |
% 2.81/1.41  	| Applying alpha-rule on (50) yields:
% 2.81/1.41  	| (51) cowlNothing(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0
% 2.81/1.41  	| (52) cowlThing(all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1
% 2.81/1.41  	| (53)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) | all_0_0_0 = 0
% 2.81/1.41  	|
% 2.81/1.41  	| Instantiating formula (9) with all_0_2_2 yields:
% 2.81/1.41  	| (54)  ~ (cowlNothing(all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 2.81/1.41  	|
% 2.81/1.41  	| Instantiating formula (6) with all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms cowlThing(all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 2.81/1.41  	| (25) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 2.81/1.41  	|
% 2.81/1.41  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (53), into two cases.
% 2.81/1.41  	|-Branch one:
% 2.81/1.41  	| (30)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 2.81/1.41  	|
% 2.81/1.41  		| Equations (25) can reduce 30 to:
% 2.81/1.41  		| (31) $false
% 2.81/1.41  		|
% 2.81/1.41  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 2.81/1.41  	|-Branch two:
% 2.81/1.41  	| (25) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 2.81/1.41  	| (20) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 2.81/1.41  	|
% 2.81/1.41  		| From (20) and (51) follows:
% 2.81/1.41  		| (60) cowlNothing(all_0_2_2) = 0
% 2.81/1.41  		|
% 2.81/1.41  		| Using (60) and (54) yields:
% 2.81/1.41  		| (27) $false
% 2.81/1.41  		|
% 2.81/1.41  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 2.81/1.41  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 2.81/1.41  
% 2.81/1.41  819ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------