%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : KRS171+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:46 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.53s 0.63s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.61s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KRS171+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 14:06:53 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.52/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.53/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.62 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.53/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.53/0.62 % Transform :cnf % 0.53/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.53/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.53/0.62 % 0.53/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.020000s % 0.53/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.020000s % 0.53/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.62 % File : KRS171+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.53/0.62 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web) % 0.53/0.62 % Problem : The inverse entailment of test 002 also holds % 0.53/0.62 % Version : Especial. % 0.53/0.62 % English : % 0.53/0.62 % 0.53/0.62 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.53/0.62 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW % 0.53/0.62 % Source : [Bec03] % 0.53/0.62 % Names : positive_equivalentProperty-Manifest003 [Bec03] % 0.53/0.62 % 0.53/0.62 % Status : Theorem % 0.53/0.62 % Rating : 0.00 v3.1.0 % 0.53/0.62 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 0.53/0.63 % Number of atoms : 14 ( 0 equ) % 0.53/0.63 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg) % 0.53/0.63 % Number of connectives : 13 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 4 &) % 0.53/0.63 % ( 3 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.53/0.63 % Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg) % 0.53/0.63 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.53/0.63 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.53/0.63 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty) % 0.53/0.63 % Number of variables : 10 ( 10 !; 0 ?) % 0.53/0.63 % SPC : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ % 0.53/0.63 % 0.53/0.63 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of % 0.53/0.63 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's % 0.53/0.63 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL. % 0.53/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.63 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.53/0.63 fof(axiom_0,axiom, % 0.53/0.63 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.63 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.53/0.63 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.63 % 0.53/0.63 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.53/0.63 fof(axiom_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.63 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.63 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.53/0.63 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.63 % 0.53/0.63 fof(axiom_2,axiom, % 0.53/0.63 ! [X,Y] : % 0.53/0.63 ( rhasHead(X,Y) % 0.53/0.63 => rhasLeader(X,Y) ) ). % 0.53/0.63 % 0.53/0.63 fof(axiom_3,axiom, % 0.53/0.63 ! [X,Y] : % 0.53/0.63 ( rhasLeader(X,Y) % 0.53/0.63 => rhasHead(X,Y) ) ). % 0.53/0.63 % 0.53/0.63 %----Thing and Nothing % 0.53/0.63 %----String and Integer disjoint % 0.53/0.63 fof(the_axiom,conjecture, % 0.53/0.63 ( ! [X] : % 0.53/0.63 ( cowlThing(X) % 0.53/0.63 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) % 0.53/0.63 & ! [X] : % 0.53/0.63 ( xsd_string(X) % 0.53/0.63 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) % 0.53/0.63 & ! [X,Y] : % 0.53/0.63 ( rhasLeader(X,Y) % 0.53/0.63 <=> rhasHead(X,Y) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.63 % 0.53/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.63 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.63 % Proof found % 0.53/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.53/0.63 % SZS output start Proof % 0.53/0.63 %ClaNum:9(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.53/0.63 %VarNum:13(SingletonVarNum:7) % 0.53/0.63 %MaxLitNum:5 % 0.53/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.53/0.63 %SharedTerms:13 % 0.53/0.63 %goalClause: 4 5 8 9 % 0.53/0.63 [1]~P1(x11) % 0.53/0.63 [2]P3(x21)+P2(x21) % 0.53/0.63 [3]~P3(x31)+~P2(x31) % 0.53/0.63 [6]~P5(x61,x62)+P4(x61,x62) % 0.53/0.63 [7]~P4(x71,x72)+P5(x71,x72) % 0.53/0.63 [4]P1(a1)+P2(a2)+P4(a3,a4)+P5(a3,a4)+~P3(a2) % 0.53/0.63 [5]P4(a3,a4)+P5(a3,a4)+P1(a1)+P3(a2)+~P2(a2) % 0.53/0.63 [8]P1(a1)+P2(a2)+~P3(a2)+~P4(a3,a4)+~P5(a3,a4) % 0.53/0.63 [9]~P4(a3,a4)+~P5(a3,a4)+P1(a1)+P3(a2)+~P2(a2) % 0.53/0.63 %EqnAxiom % 0.53/0.63 % 0.53/0.63 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.63 cnf(14,plain, % 0.53/0.63 (P4(a3,a4)+P5(a3,a4)+P2(a2)+~P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4])). % 0.53/0.63 cnf(15,plain, % 0.53/0.63 (P4(a3,a4)+P5(a3,a4)+P3(a2)+~P2(a2)), % 0.53/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5])). % 0.53/0.63 cnf(16,plain, % 0.53/0.63 (~P4(a3,a4)+~P5(a3,a4)+P2(a2)+~P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,8])). % 0.53/0.63 cnf(17,plain, % 0.53/0.63 (~P4(a3,a4)+~P5(a3,a4)+P3(a2)+~P2(a2)), % 0.53/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,9])). % 0.53/0.63 cnf(21,plain, % 0.53/0.63 (P4(a3,a4)+P5(a3,a4)+P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,15])). % 0.53/0.63 cnf(22,plain, % 0.53/0.63 (P5(a3,a4)+P3(a2)), % 0.53/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[21,7])). % 0.61/0.63 cnf(23,plain, % 0.61/0.63 (P4(a3,a4)+P3(a2)), % 0.61/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[22,6])). % 0.61/0.63 cnf(24,plain, % 0.61/0.63 (~P5(a3,a4)+P3(a2)+~P2(a2)), % 0.61/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,17])). % 0.61/0.63 cnf(25,plain, % 0.61/0.63 (~P4(a3,a4)+P3(a2)+~P2(a2)), % 0.61/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[24,7])). % 0.61/0.63 cnf(26,plain, % 0.61/0.63 (~P2(a2)+P3(a2)), % 0.61/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[25,23])). % 0.61/0.63 cnf(27,plain, % 0.61/0.63 (P3(a2)), % 0.61/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,2])). % 0.61/0.63 cnf(28,plain, % 0.61/0.63 (P5(a3,a4)+P4(a3,a4)+P2(a2)), % 0.61/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,14])). % 0.61/0.63 cnf(29,plain, % 0.61/0.63 (~P5(a3,a4)+~P4(a3,a4)+P2(a2)), % 0.61/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,16])). % 0.61/0.63 cnf(30,plain, % 0.61/0.63 (P4(a3,a4)+P2(a2)), % 0.61/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,6])). % 0.61/0.63 cnf(31,plain, % 0.61/0.63 (P5(a3,a4)+P2(a2)), % 0.61/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[30,7])). % 0.61/0.63 cnf(32,plain, % 0.61/0.63 (~P4(a3,a4)+P2(a2)), % 0.61/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[31,29])). % 0.61/0.63 cnf(33,plain, % 0.61/0.63 (P2(a2)), % 0.61/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[32,30])). % 0.61/0.63 cnf(34,plain, % 0.61/0.63 ($false), % 0.61/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,27,3]), % 0.61/0.63 ['proof']). % 0.61/0.63 % SZS output end Proof % 0.61/0.63 % Total time :0.020000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------