↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KRS178+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:54:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.06s 6.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  11   ~;   8   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0 sgn  26   !;   3   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2,X3] :
          ( status(X2,X3,X0)
         => status(X2,X3,X1) )
    <=> isa(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',isa) ).

fof(f14,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : isa(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',isa_reflexive) ).

fof(f15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : isa(X0,X0),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f14]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2,X3] :
          ( status(X2,X3,X0)
         => status(X2,X3,X1) )
     => isa(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2,X3] :
          ( status(X2,X3,X0)
          & ~ status(X2,X3,X1) )
      | isa(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ? [X0] : ~ isa(X0,X0),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( status(sK0(X0,X1),sK1(X0,X1),X0)
        & ~ status(sK0(X0,X1),sK1(X0,X1),X1) )
      | isa(X0,X1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X0,X1)),skolemize(X3,sK1(X0,X1))],[f17]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ~ isa(sK20,sK20),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK20]),skolemize(X0,sK20)],[f19]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( status(sK0(X0,X1),sK1(X0,X1),X0)
      | isa(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ status(sK0(X0,X1),sK1(X0,X1),X1)
      | isa(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ~ isa(sK20,sK20),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( isa(X0,X1)
      | ~ status(sK0(X0,X1),sK1(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( isa(X0,X1)
      | status(sK0(X0,X1),sK1(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_70,negated_conjecture,
    ~ isa(sK20,sK20),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

tcf(c_82,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( isa(X0,X1)
      | ~ status(sK0(X0,X1),sK1(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

tcf(c_92,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( isa(X0,X1)
      | status(sK0(X0,X1),sK1(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

tcf(c_177,plain,
    status(sK0(sK20,sK20),sK1(sK20,sK20),sK20),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_70]) ).

tcf(c_181,plain,
    ~ status(sK0(sK20,sK20),sK1(sK20,sK20),sK20),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_70]) ).

tcf(c_182,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_181,c_177]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KRS178+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/5.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 19:36:17 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/5.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.42  
% 0.14/5.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/5.42  
% 0.14/5.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/5.44  % Proving...
% 1.06/6.17  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.06/6.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.06/6.17  
% 1.06/6.17  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.06/6.17  
% 1.06/6.17  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.06/6.17  
% 1.06/6.17  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.06/6.17  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.06/6.17  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.06/6.17  
% 1.06/6.17  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.06/6.17  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.06/6.17  
% 1.06/6.17  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s % 
% 1.06/6.17  
% 1.06/6.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.06/6.17  
% 1.06/6.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.06/6.18  
% 1.06/6.18  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------