↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : KRS179+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:48 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.59s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : KRS179+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 12:18:54 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.64  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.59/0.64  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.64  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.59/0.64  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.59/0.64  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.59/0.64  
% 0.59/0.64  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.59/0.64  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.59/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.64  % File     : KRS179+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.59/0.64  % Domain   : Knowledge Representation
% 0.59/0.64  % Problem  : If S1 isa S2 and S1 is nota S3, then S2 is nota S3
% 0.59/0.64  % Version  : [Sut08] axioms.
% 0.59/0.64  % English  :
% 0.59/0.64  
% 0.59/0.64  % Refs     : [Sut08] Sutcliffe (2008), The SZS Ontologies for Automated Rea
% 0.59/0.64  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 0.59/0.64  % Names    :
% 0.59/0.64  
% 0.59/0.64  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.59/0.64  % Rating   : 0.12 v8.2.0, 0.20 v8.1.0, 0.07 v7.5.0, 0.10 v7.4.0, 0.12 v7.3.0, 0.29 v7.2.0, 0.17 v7.1.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.4.0
% 0.59/0.64  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   2 unt;   0 def)
% 0.59/0.64  %            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
% 0.59/0.64  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.59/0.64  %            Number of connectives :   35 (  10   ~;   1   |;  12   &)
% 0.59/0.64  %                                         (   6 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
% 0.59/0.64  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 0.59/0.64  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.59/0.64  %            Number of predicates  :    7 (   7 usr;   0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.59/0.64  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
% 0.59/0.64  %            Number of variables   :   48 (  26   !;  22   ?)
% 0.59/0.64  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.59/0.64  
% 0.59/0.64  % Comments :
% 0.59/0.64  % Bugfixes : v5.4.0 - Added missing axiom in KRS001+1.ax
% 0.59/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.64  %----Include SZS success ontology node relationships
% 0.59/0.64  include('Axioms/KRS001+1.ax').
% 0.59/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.64  fof(isa_transitive,conjecture,
% 0.59/0.64      ! [S1,S2,S3] :
% 0.59/0.64        ( ( isa(S1,S2)
% 0.59/0.64          & isa(S2,S3) )
% 0.59/0.64       => isa(S1,S3) ) ).
% 0.59/0.64  
% 0.59/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.64  % Proof found
% 0.59/0.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.64  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.59/0.65  %ClaNum:38(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.59/0.65  %VarNum:140(SingletonVarNum:51)
% 0.59/0.65  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.59/0.65  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.59/0.65  %SharedTerms:38
% 0.59/0.65  %goalClause: 1 2 11
% 0.59/0.65  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.59/0.65  [1]P1(a1,a24)
% 0.59/0.65  [2]P1(a24,a25)
% 0.59/0.65  [3]P2(a2,a3)
% 0.59/0.65  [4]P2(a6,a7)
% 0.59/0.65  [5]P2(a6,a10)
% 0.59/0.65  [6]P2(a11,a12)
% 0.59/0.65  [7]P2(a17,a16)
% 0.59/0.65  [8]P2(a18,a20)
% 0.59/0.65  [9]P2(a21,a22)
% 0.59/0.65  [11]~P1(a1,a25)
% 0.59/0.65  [12]~P2(a8,a3)
% 0.59/0.65  [13]~P2(a17,a12)
% 0.59/0.65  [14]~P2(a19,a16)
% 0.59/0.65  [15]~P2(a18,a22)
% 0.59/0.65  [10]P2(x101,a4)
% 0.59/0.65  [16]~P2(x161,a9)
% 0.59/0.65  [20]~P2(a13,a7)+~P2(a14,a10)
% 0.59/0.65  [17]~P2(x171,a12)+P2(x171,a16)
% 0.59/0.65  [19]P2(x191,x192)+P2(x191,f26(x192))
% 0.59/0.65  [22]~P2(x221,x222)+~P2(x221,f26(x222))
% 0.59/0.65  [23]P1(x231,x232)+P4(f27(x231,x232),f28(x231,x232),x231)
% 0.59/0.65  [24]P5(x241,x242)+P4(f29(x241,x242),f32(x241,x242),x242)
% 0.59/0.65  [25]P5(x251,x252)+P4(f29(x251,x252),f32(x251,x252),x251)
% 0.59/0.65  [26]~P3(x261,x262)+P4(f15(x261,x262),f23(x261,x262),x262)
% 0.59/0.65  [27]~P3(x271,x272)+P4(f15(x271,x272),f23(x271,x272),x271)
% 0.59/0.65  [28]~P6(x281,x282)+P4(f30(x281,x282),f31(x281,x282),x281)
% 0.59/0.65  [32]P1(x321,x322)+~P4(f27(x321,x322),f28(x321,x322),x322)
% 0.59/0.65  [34]~P6(x341,x342)+~P4(f30(x341,x342),f31(x341,x342),x342)
% 0.59/0.65  [37]P7(x371,x372)+P4(f33(x371,x372),f5(x371,x372),x372)+~P4(f33(x371,x372),f5(x371,x372),x371)
% 0.59/0.65  [38]P7(x381,x382)+P4(f33(x381,x382),f5(x381,x382),x381)+~P4(f33(x381,x382),f5(x381,x382),x382)
% 0.59/0.65  [29]~P7(x294,x293)+P4(x291,x292,x293)+P4(x291,x292,x294)
% 0.59/0.65  [30]~P4(x303,x304,x301)+P6(x301,x302)+P4(x303,x304,x302)
% 0.59/0.65  [31]~P4(x311,x312,x314)+P4(x311,x312,x313)+~P1(x314,x313)
% 0.59/0.65  [33]~P4(x333,x334,x331)+P3(x331,x332)+~P4(x333,x334,x332)
% 0.59/0.65  [35]~P4(x353,x354,x351)+~P5(x351,x352)+~P4(x353,x354,x352)
% 0.59/0.65  [36]~P4(x363,x364,x361)+~P7(x361,x362)+~P4(x363,x364,x362)
% 0.59/0.65  %EqnAxiom
% 0.59/0.65  
% 0.59/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.65  cnf(39,plain,
% 0.59/0.65     (~P4(x391,x392,a1)+P4(x391,x392,a24)),
% 0.59/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,31])).
% 0.59/0.65  cnf(44,plain,
% 0.59/0.65     (~P4(x441,x442,a24)+P4(x441,x442,a25)),
% 0.59/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,31])).
% 0.59/0.65  cnf(56,plain,
% 0.59/0.65     (~P4(f27(a1,a25),f28(a1,a25),a24)),
% 0.59/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,44,32])).
% 0.59/0.65  cnf(60,plain,
% 0.59/0.65     ($false),
% 0.59/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,56,39,23]),
% 0.59/0.65     ['proof']).
% 0.59/0.65  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.59/0.65  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------