%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.7
% Problem : KRS180+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:48 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : KRS180+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 13:22:24 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.54/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.62 % File :CSE---1.7
% 0.55/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.55/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.55/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.55/0.62
% 0.55/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.55/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.55/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.62 % File : KRS180+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.55/0.62 % Domain : Knowledge Representation
% 0.55/0.62 % Problem : isa is incompatible with nota, nevera, and xora
% 0.55/0.62 % Version : [Sut08] axioms.
% 0.55/0.62 % English :
% 0.55/0.62
% 0.55/0.62 % Refs : [Sut08] Sutcliffe (2008), The SZS Ontologies for Automated Rea
% 0.55/0.62 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.55/0.62 % Names :
% 0.55/0.62
% 0.55/0.62 % Status : Theorem
% 0.55/0.62 % Rating : 0.06 v8.2.0, 0.13 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.29 v7.2.0, 0.17 v7.1.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0
% 0.55/0.62 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 2 unt; 0 def)
% 0.55/0.62 % Number of atoms : 41 ( 0 equ)
% 0.55/0.62 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% 0.55/0.62 % Number of connectives : 38 ( 11 ~; 3 |; 12 &)
% 0.55/0.62 % ( 6 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 2 <~>)
% 0.55/0.62 % Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 7 avg)
% 0.55/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.55/0.62 % Number of predicates : 7 ( 7 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.55/0.62 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 con; 1-1 aty)
% 0.55/0.62 % Number of variables : 49 ( 25 !; 24 ?)
% 0.55/0.62 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.55/0.62
% 0.55/0.62 % Comments :
% 0.55/0.62 % Bugfixes : v5.4.0 - Added missing axiom in KRS001+1.ax
% 0.55/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.62 %----Include SZS success ontology node relationships
% 0.55/0.62 include('Axioms/KRS001+1.ax').
% 0.55/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.62 fof(isa_exclusive,conjecture,
% 0.55/0.62 ! [S1,S2] :
% 0.55/0.62 ? [Ax,C] :
% 0.55/0.62 ( status(Ax,C,S1)
% 0.55/0.62 => ~ ( isa(S1,S2)
% 0.55/0.62 & ( nota(S1,S2)
% 0.55/0.62 | nevera(S1,S2)
% 0.55/0.62 | xora(S1,S2) ) ) ) ).
% 0.55/0.63
% 0.55/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.63 % Proof found
% 0.55/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.63 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.55/0.63 %ClaNum:38(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.55/0.63 %VarNum:142(SingletonVarNum:53)
% 0.55/0.63 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.55/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.55/0.63 %SharedTerms:38
% 0.55/0.63 %goalClause: 1 10 17
% 0.55/0.63 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.55/0.63 [1]P1(a1,a24)
% 0.55/0.63 [2]P2(a2,a3)
% 0.55/0.63 [3]P2(a6,a7)
% 0.55/0.63 [4]P2(a6,a10)
% 0.55/0.63 [5]P2(a11,a12)
% 0.55/0.63 [6]P2(a17,a16)
% 0.55/0.63 [7]P2(a18,a20)
% 0.55/0.63 [8]P2(a21,a22)
% 0.55/0.63 [11]~P2(a8,a3)
% 0.55/0.63 [12]~P2(a17,a12)
% 0.55/0.63 [13]~P2(a19,a16)
% 0.55/0.63 [14]~P2(a18,a22)
% 0.55/0.63 [9]P2(x91,a4)
% 0.55/0.63 [15]~P2(x151,a9)
% 0.55/0.63 [10]P4(x101,x102,a1)
% 0.55/0.63 [20]~P2(a13,a7)+~P2(a14,a10)
% 0.55/0.63 [16]~P2(x161,a12)+P2(x161,a16)
% 0.55/0.63 [19]P2(x191,x192)+P2(x191,f25(x192))
% 0.55/0.63 [22]~P2(x221,x222)+~P2(x221,f25(x222))
% 0.55/0.63 [23]P1(x231,x232)+P4(f26(x231,x232),f27(x231,x232),x231)
% 0.55/0.63 [24]P6(x241,x242)+P4(f28(x241,x242),f31(x241,x242),x242)
% 0.55/0.63 [25]P6(x251,x252)+P4(f28(x251,x252),f31(x251,x252),x251)
% 0.55/0.63 [26]~P3(x261,x262)+P4(f15(x261,x262),f23(x261,x262),x262)
% 0.55/0.63 [27]~P3(x271,x272)+P4(f15(x271,x272),f23(x271,x272),x271)
% 0.55/0.63 [28]~P5(x281,x282)+P4(f29(x281,x282),f30(x281,x282),x281)
% 0.55/0.63 [32]P1(x321,x322)+~P4(f26(x321,x322),f27(x321,x322),x322)
% 0.55/0.63 [34]~P5(x341,x342)+~P4(f29(x341,x342),f30(x341,x342),x342)
% 0.55/0.63 [17]P5(a1,a24)+P6(a1,a24)+P7(a1,a24)
% 0.55/0.63 [37]P7(x371,x372)+P4(f32(x371,x372),f5(x371,x372),x372)+~P4(f32(x371,x372),f5(x371,x372),x371)
% 0.55/0.63 [38]P7(x381,x382)+P4(f32(x381,x382),f5(x381,x382),x381)+~P4(f32(x381,x382),f5(x381,x382),x382)
% 0.55/0.63 [29]~P7(x294,x293)+P4(x291,x292,x293)+P4(x291,x292,x294)
% 0.55/0.63 [30]~P4(x303,x304,x301)+P5(x301,x302)+P4(x303,x304,x302)
% 0.55/0.63 [31]~P4(x311,x312,x314)+P4(x311,x312,x313)+~P1(x314,x313)
% 0.55/0.63 [33]~P4(x333,x334,x331)+P3(x331,x332)+~P4(x333,x334,x332)
% 0.55/0.63 [35]~P4(x353,x354,x351)+~P6(x351,x352)+~P4(x353,x354,x352)
% 0.55/0.63 [36]~P4(x363,x364,x361)+~P7(x361,x362)+~P4(x363,x364,x362)
% 0.55/0.63 %EqnAxiom
% 0.55/0.63
% 0.55/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.63 cnf(40,plain,
% 0.55/0.63 (P4(x401,x402,a1)),
% 0.55/0.63 inference(rename_variables,[],[10])).
% 0.55/0.63 cnf(43,plain,
% 0.55/0.63 (P4(x431,x432,a1)),
% 0.55/0.63 inference(rename_variables,[],[10])).
% 0.55/0.63 cnf(45,plain,
% 0.55/0.63 (P4(x451,x452,a24)),
% 0.55/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,10,40,43,32,34,31])).
% 0.55/0.63 cnf(54,plain,
% 0.55/0.63 (P4(x541,x542,a24)),
% 0.55/0.63 inference(rename_variables,[],[45])).
% 0.55/0.63 cnf(57,plain,
% 0.55/0.63 (P4(x571,x572,a24)),
% 0.55/0.63 inference(rename_variables,[],[45])).
% 0.55/0.63 cnf(60,plain,
% 0.55/0.63 (P4(x601,x602,a24)),
% 0.55/0.63 inference(rename_variables,[],[45])).
% 0.55/0.63 cnf(63,plain,
% 0.55/0.63 (P4(x631,x632,a24)),
% 0.55/0.63 inference(rename_variables,[],[45])).
% 0.55/0.63 cnf(68,plain,
% 0.55/0.63 ($false),
% 0.55/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[10,45,54,57,60,63,32,34,36,33,35,17]),
% 0.55/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.61/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.61/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------