↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KRS180+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:46:16 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   93 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  111 (  46   ~;  43   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   80 (   6 sgn  38   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(isa,axiom,
    ! [S1,S2] :
      ( ! [Ax,C] :
          ( status(Ax,C,S1)
         => status(Ax,C,S2) )
    <=> isa(S1,S2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',isa) ).

fof(nota,axiom,
    ! [S1,S2] :
      ( ? [Ax,C] :
          ( ~ status(Ax,C,S2)
          & status(Ax,C,S1) )
    <=> nota(S1,S2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',nota) ).

fof(nevera,axiom,
    ! [S1,S2] :
      ( ! [Ax,C] :
          ( status(Ax,C,S1)
         => ~ status(Ax,C,S2) )
    <=> nevera(S1,S2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',nevera) ).

fof(xora,axiom,
    ! [S1,S2] :
      ( ! [Ax,C] :
          ~ ( status(Ax,C,S1)
          <=> status(Ax,C,S2) )
    <=> xora(S1,S2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',xora) ).

fof(isa_exclusive,conjecture,
    ! [S1,S2] :
    ? [Ax,C] :
      ( status(Ax,C,S1)
     => ~ ( ( xora(S1,S2)
            | nevera(S1,S2)
            | nota(S1,S2) )
          & isa(S1,S2) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',isa_exclusive) ).

fof(isa_exclusive_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [S1,S2] :
      ? [Ax,C] :
        ( status(Ax,C,S1)
       => ~ ( ( xora(S1,S2)
              | nevera(S1,S2)
              | nota(S1,S2) )
            & isa(S1,S2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[isa_exclusive]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    ( ~ isa(C,D)
    | status(A,B,D)
    | ~ status(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[isa]) ).

fof(nnf_14,plain,
    ? [S1,S2] :
    ! [Ax,C] :
      ( ( xora(S1,S2)
        | nevera(S1,S2)
        | nota(S1,S2) )
      & isa(S1,S2)
      & status(Ax,C,S1) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[isa_exclusive_neg]) ).

fof(sk_isa_exclusive_neg,plain,
    ! [Ax,C] :
      ( ( xora(sK0,sK1)
        | nevera(sK0,sK1)
        | nota(sK0,sK1) )
      & isa(sK0,sK1)
      & status(Ax,C,sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(S1,sK0),skolemize(S2,sK1)],[nnf_14]) ).

cnf(c_19,negated_conjecture,
    isa(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_isa_exclusive_neg]) ).

fof(nnf_3,plain,
    ! [S1,S2] :
      ( ( ~ nota(S1,S2)
        | ? [Ax,C] :
            ( ~ status(Ax,C,S2)
            & status(Ax,C,S1) ) )
      & ( nota(S1,S2)
        | ! [X0,X1] :
            ( status(X0,X1,S2)
            | ~ status(X0,X1,S1) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[nota]) ).

fof(sk_nota_sk,plain,
    ! [S1,S2] :
      ( ( ~ nota(S1,S2)
        | ( ~ status(sK2(S1,S2),sK3(S1,S2),S2)
          & status(sK2(S1,S2),sK3(S1,S2),S1) ) )
      & ( nota(S1,S2)
        | ! [X0,X1] :
            ( status(X0,X1,S2)
            | ~ status(X0,X1,S1) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3]),skolemize(Ax,sK2(S1,S2)),skolemize(C,sK3(S1,S2))],[nnf_3]) ).

fof(sk_nota,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ nota(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ status(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),sK3(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ nota(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | status(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),sK3(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( nota(VAR_2,VAR_3)
        | status(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_3)
        | ~ status(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_nota_sk]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( ~ nota(A,B)
    | ~ status(sK2(A,B),sK3(A,B),B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_nota]) ).

cnf(c_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( xora(sK0,sK1)
    | nevera(sK0,sK1)
    | nota(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_isa_exclusive_neg]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    ( ~ nevera(C,D)
    | ~ status(A,B,D)
    | ~ status(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[nevera]) ).

cnf(c_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ status(sK2(sK0,sK1),sK3(sK0,sK1),sK1)
    | xora(sK0,sK1)
    | nevera(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ status(sK2(sK0,sK1),sK3(sK0,sK1),sK1)
    | xora(sK0,sK1)
    | ~ status(A,B,sK1)
    | ~ status(A,B,sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_27]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    ( ~ xora(C,D)
    | ~ status(A,B,D)
    | ~ status(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[xora]) ).

cnf(c_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ status(sK2(sK0,sK1),sK3(sK0,sK1),sK1)
    | ~ status(C,D,sK1)
    | ~ status(C,D,sK0)
    | ~ status(A,B,sK1)
    | ~ status(A,B,sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_34]) ).

cnf(c_46,negated_conjecture,
    status(A,B,sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_isa_exclusive_neg]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    ( status(A,B,sK1)
    | ~ status(A,B,sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    status(A,B,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_64]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    ( ~ status(sK2(sK0,sK1),sK3(sK0,sK1),sK1)
    | ~ status(A,B,sK1)
    | ~ status(A,B,sK1)
    | ~ status(A,B,sK0) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_37]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    ( ~ status(sK2(sK0,sK1),sK3(sK0,sK1),sK1)
    | ~ status(A,B,sK1)
    | ~ status(A,B,sK0) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_71]) ).

cnf(c_73,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ status(sK2(sK0,sK1),sK3(sK0,sK1),sK1)
    | ~ status(A,B,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_72]) ).

cnf(c_74,negated_conjecture,
    ~ status(sK2(sK0,sK1),sK3(sK0,sK1),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_73]) ).

cnf(c_70,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_74]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KRS180+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:43:03 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.36  % Process 14548 was started by sandbox2 on n005,
% 0.08/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 19:43:03 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/0.36  
% 0.08/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.08/0.38  % Length of proof is 18.
% 0.08/0.38  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.08/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 24.000.
% 0.08/0.38  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------