↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : KRS181+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:08:48 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.48s 0.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : KRS181+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 12:33:23 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.48/0.55  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.81  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.81  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.48/0.81  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.81  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.48/0.81  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.48/0.81  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.48/0.81  
% 0.48/0.81  % Result      :Theorem 0.210000s
% 0.48/0.81  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.210000s
% 0.48/0.81  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.81  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.81  % File     : KRS181+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.48/0.81  % Domain   : Knowledge Representation
% 0.48/0.81  % Problem  : If S1 isa S2, and S1 nota S3, then S2 nota S3
% 0.48/0.81  % Version  : [Sut08] axioms.
% 0.48/0.81  % English  :
% 0.48/0.81  
% 0.48/0.81  % Refs     : [Sut08] Sutcliffe (2008), The SZS Ontologies for Automated Rea
% 0.48/0.81  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 0.48/0.81  % Names    :
% 0.48/0.81  
% 0.48/0.81  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.48/0.81  % Rating   : 0.12 v8.2.0, 0.20 v8.1.0, 0.07 v7.5.0, 0.10 v7.4.0, 0.12 v7.3.0, 0.29 v7.2.0, 0.17 v7.1.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.08 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.4.0
% 0.48/0.81  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   2 unt;   0 def)
% 0.48/0.81  %            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
% 0.48/0.81  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.48/0.81  %            Number of connectives :   35 (  10   ~;   1   |;  12   &)
% 0.48/0.81  %                                         (   6 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
% 0.48/0.81  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 0.48/0.81  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.48/0.81  %            Number of predicates  :    7 (   7 usr;   0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.48/0.81  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
% 0.48/0.81  %            Number of variables   :   48 (  26   !;  22   ?)
% 0.48/0.81  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.48/0.81  
% 0.48/0.81  % Comments :
% 0.48/0.81  % Bugfixes : v5.4.0 - Added missing axiom in KRS001+1.ax
% 0.48/0.81  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.81  %----Include SZS success ontology node relationships
% 0.48/0.81  include('Axioms/KRS001+1.ax').
% 0.48/0.81  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.81  fof(nota_isa_nota,conjecture,
% 0.48/0.81      ! [S1,S2,S3] :
% 0.48/0.81        ( ( isa(S1,S2)
% 0.48/0.81          & nota(S1,S3) )
% 0.48/0.81       => nota(S2,S3) ) ).
% 0.48/0.81  
% 0.48/0.81  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.81  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.81  % Proof found
% 0.48/0.81  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.81  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.48/0.81  %ClaNum:38(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.48/0.81  %VarNum:140(SingletonVarNum:51)
% 0.48/0.81  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.48/0.81  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.48/0.81  %SharedTerms:38
% 0.48/0.81  %goalClause: 1 2 11
% 0.48/0.81  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.48/0.81  [1]P1(a1,a24)
% 0.48/0.81  [2]P2(a1,a25)
% 0.48/0.82  [3]P3(a2,a3)
% 0.48/0.82  [4]P3(a6,a7)
% 0.48/0.82  [5]P3(a6,a10)
% 0.48/0.82  [6]P3(a11,a12)
% 0.48/0.82  [7]P3(a17,a16)
% 0.48/0.82  [8]P3(a18,a20)
% 0.48/0.82  [9]P3(a21,a22)
% 0.48/0.82  [11]~P2(a24,a25)
% 0.48/0.82  [12]~P3(a8,a3)
% 0.48/0.82  [13]~P3(a17,a12)
% 0.48/0.82  [14]~P3(a19,a16)
% 0.48/0.82  [15]~P3(a18,a22)
% 0.48/0.82  [10]P3(x101,a4)
% 0.48/0.82  [16]~P3(x161,a9)
% 0.48/0.82  [20]~P3(a13,a7)+~P3(a14,a10)
% 0.48/0.82  [17]~P3(x171,a12)+P3(x171,a16)
% 0.48/0.82  [19]P3(x191,x192)+P3(x191,f26(x192))
% 0.48/0.82  [22]~P3(x221,x222)+~P3(x221,f26(x222))
% 0.48/0.82  [23]P1(x231,x232)+P6(f27(x231,x232),f28(x231,x232),x231)
% 0.48/0.82  [24]P5(x241,x242)+P6(f29(x241,x242),f32(x241,x242),x242)
% 0.48/0.82  [25]P5(x251,x252)+P6(f29(x251,x252),f32(x251,x252),x251)
% 0.48/0.82  [26]~P4(x261,x262)+P6(f15(x261,x262),f23(x261,x262),x262)
% 0.48/0.82  [27]~P4(x271,x272)+P6(f15(x271,x272),f23(x271,x272),x271)
% 0.48/0.82  [28]~P2(x281,x282)+P6(f30(x281,x282),f31(x281,x282),x281)
% 0.48/0.82  [32]P1(x321,x322)+~P6(f27(x321,x322),f28(x321,x322),x322)
% 0.48/0.82  [34]~P2(x341,x342)+~P6(f30(x341,x342),f31(x341,x342),x342)
% 0.48/0.82  [37]P7(x371,x372)+P6(f33(x371,x372),f5(x371,x372),x372)+~P6(f33(x371,x372),f5(x371,x372),x371)
% 0.48/0.82  [38]P7(x381,x382)+P6(f33(x381,x382),f5(x381,x382),x381)+~P6(f33(x381,x382),f5(x381,x382),x382)
% 0.48/0.82  [29]~P7(x294,x293)+P6(x291,x292,x293)+P6(x291,x292,x294)
% 0.49/0.82  [30]~P6(x303,x304,x301)+P2(x301,x302)+P6(x303,x304,x302)
% 0.49/0.82  [31]~P6(x311,x312,x314)+P6(x311,x312,x313)+~P1(x314,x313)
% 0.49/0.82  [33]~P6(x333,x334,x331)+P4(x331,x332)+~P6(x333,x334,x332)
% 0.49/0.82  [35]~P6(x353,x354,x351)+~P5(x351,x352)+~P6(x353,x354,x352)
% 0.49/0.82  [36]~P6(x363,x364,x361)+~P7(x361,x362)+~P6(x363,x364,x362)
% 0.49/0.82  %EqnAxiom
% 0.49/0.82  
% 0.49/0.82  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.82  cnf(39,plain,
% 0.49/0.82     (~P6(x391,x392,a1)+P6(x391,x392,a24)),
% 0.49/0.82     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,31])).
% 0.49/0.82  cnf(108,plain,
% 0.49/0.82     (P6(x1081,x1082,a25)+~P6(x1081,x1082,a1)),
% 0.49/0.82     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,39,30])).
% 0.49/0.82  cnf(109,plain,
% 0.49/0.82     (P6(f30(a1,a25),f31(a1,a25),a25)),
% 0.49/0.82     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,108,28])).
% 0.49/0.82  cnf(110,plain,
% 0.49/0.82     ($false),
% 0.49/0.82     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,109,34]),
% 0.49/0.82     ['proof']).
% 0.49/0.82  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.49/0.82  % Total time :0.210000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------