↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : KRS181+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:56:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.98s 2.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   27 (   8 unt;   9 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   56 (   0 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( nota(X1,X2)
    | status(X3,X4,X2)
    | ~ status(X3,X4,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jliwsmco/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_3,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jliwsmco/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    ( status(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ isa(X4,X3)
    | ~ status(X1,X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jliwsmco/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( status(esk7_2(X1,X2),esk8_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ nota(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jliwsmco/input.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ nota(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(esk7_2(X1,X2),esk8_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jliwsmco/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jliwsmco/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    isa(esk9_0,esk10_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jliwsmco/input.p',i_0_15) ).

cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    nota(esk9_0,esk11_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jliwsmco/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nota(esk10_0,esk11_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jliwsmco/input.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( nota(X1,X2)
    | status(X3,X4,X2)
    | ~ status(X3,X4,X1) ),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( status(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ isa(X4,X3)
    | ~ status(X1,X2,X4) ),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( status(esk7_2(X1,X2),esk8_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ nota(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | nota(X1,X3)
    | isa(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ nota(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(esk7_2(X1,X2),esk8_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( status(esk7_2(X1,X2),esk8_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ nota(X1,X2)
    | ~ isa(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | nota(X1,X4)
    | nota(X4,X3)
    | isa(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ nota(X1,X2)
    | ~ isa(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( nota(X1,X2)
    | nota(X3,X1)
    | isa(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    isa(esk9_0,esk10_0),
    i_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( nota(X1,X2)
    | nota(X2,X3)
    | ~ nota(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    nota(esk9_0,esk11_0),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nota(esk9_0,esk10_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( nota(X1,esk11_0)
    | nota(esk9_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nota(esk10_0,esk11_0),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : KRS181+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 07:22:31 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.98/2.54  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.98/2.54  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.98/2.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 7.98/2.54  
% 7.98/2.54  # Proof found!
% 7.98/2.54  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.98/2.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.98/2.54  # Proof object total steps             : 27
% 7.98/2.54  # Proof object clause steps            : 18
% 7.98/2.54  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 7.98/2.54  # Proof object conjectures             : 9
% 7.98/2.54  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 6
% 7.98/2.54  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 7.98/2.54  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 7.98/2.54  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 7.98/2.54  # Proof object generating inferences   : 9
% 7.98/2.54  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 7.98/2.54  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.98/2.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 7.98/2.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Initial clauses                      : 19
% 7.98/2.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 7.98/2.54  # Processed clauses                    : 145
% 7.98/2.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # ...subsumed                          : 28
% 7.98/2.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 117
% 7.98/2.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Generated clauses                    : 448
% 7.98/2.54  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 433
% 7.98/2.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 7.98/2.54  # Paramodulations                      : 448
% 7.98/2.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 117
% 7.98/2.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 7.98/2.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.98/2.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 7.98/2.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 108
% 7.98/2.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 306
% 7.98/2.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1026
% 7.98/2.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2924
% 7.98/2.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1758
% 7.98/2.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 22
% 7.98/2.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 7.98/2.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 7.98/2.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 7.98/2.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5004
% 7.98/2.54  
% 7.98/2.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.98/2.54  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 7.98/2.54  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 7.98/2.54  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 7.98/2.54  # ...preprocessing         : 0.010 s
% 7.98/2.54  # ...main loop             : 0.007 s
% 7.98/2.54  # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 7.98/2.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------