↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : KRS181+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:00:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : KRS181+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 07:10:21 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 0.13/0.37  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 0.13/0.37  #
% 0.13/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.37  # Number of axioms: 38 Number of unprocessed: 36
% 0.13/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.37  # 36 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.37  # There are 3 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.37  # Found 16 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.37  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.37  # 3 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.37  # 20 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.37  # 16 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3
% 0.13/0.37  # Returning from population with 15 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.37  # We now have 15 tableaux to operate on
% 0.13/0.38  # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 2 folds and 1 closures done.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.38  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_38, negated_conjecture, (isa(esk29_0,esk30_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_37, negated_conjecture, (nota(esk29_0,esk31_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (model(esk13_0,esk12_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (model(esk18_0,esk16_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (model(esk18_0,esk17_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (model(esk22_0,esk20_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (model(esk23_0,esk21_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (model(esk25_0,esk26_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (model(X1,esk11_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (model(esk28_0,esk27_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_36, negated_conjecture, (~nota(esk30_0,esk31_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (~model(X1,esk15_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (~model(esk14_0,esk12_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~model(esk23_0,esk20_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (~model(esk24_0,esk21_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~model(esk25_0,esk27_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (~nota(X1,X2)|~status(esk5_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (~nevera(X1,X2)|~status(X3,X4,X2)|~status(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (~xora(X1,X2)|~status(X3,X4,X2)|~status(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (isa(X1,X2)|status(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (~model(X1,not(X2))|~model(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (status(esk5_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2),X1)|~nota(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (isa(X1,X2)|~status(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (nota(X1,X2)|status(X3,X4,X2)|~status(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (~model(esk19_0,esk16_0)|~model(esk19_0,esk17_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (status(X1,X2,X3)|~isa(X4,X3)|~status(X1,X2,X4))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (status(X1,X2,X3)|status(X1,X2,X4)|~xora(X3,X4))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (mighta(X1,X2)|~status(X3,X4,X2)|~status(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (nevera(X1,X2)|status(esk7_2(X1,X2),esk8_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (nevera(X1,X2)|status(esk7_2(X1,X2),esk8_2(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|~mighta(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)|~mighta(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (xora(X1,X2)|status(esk9_2(X1,X2),esk10_2(X1,X2),X2)|~status(esk9_2(X1,X2),esk10_2(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (xora(X1,X2)|status(esk9_2(X1,X2),esk10_2(X1,X2),X1)|~status(esk9_2(X1,X2),esk10_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (model(X1,esk21_0)|~model(X1,esk20_0))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (model(X1,not(X2))|model(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.38  # Found 8 steps
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_38, negated_conjecture, (isa(esk29_0,esk30_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (isa(esk29_0,esk30_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_159, plain, (status(esk5_2(esk29_0,esk31_0),esk6_2(esk29_0,esk31_0),esk30_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_202, plain, (nota(esk30_0,esk31_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_36])).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_203, plain, (status(esk5_2(esk29_0,esk31_0),esk6_2(esk29_0,esk31_0),esk31_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_234, plain, (~nota(esk29_0,esk31_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_37])).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_161, plain, (~status(esk5_2(esk29_0,esk31_0),esk6_2(esk29_0,esk31_0),esk29_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_247, plain, (~nota(esk29_0,esk31_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_37])).
% 0.13/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.38  # Child (21434) has found a proof.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  # Proof search is over...
% 0.13/0.38  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------