↑ Up

SuperZenon---0.0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : KRS181+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:32:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.45s 2.65s
% Output   : Proof 2.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : KRS181+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 07:29:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.45/2.65  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.45/2.65  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 2.45/2.65  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 2.45/2.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.45/2.65  1. (status T_0 T_1 T_2) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_2))   ### Axiom
% 2.45/2.65  2. (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_3)) (status T_0 T_1 T_3)   ### Axiom
% 2.45/2.65  3. ((status T_0 T_1 T_2) => (status T_0 T_1 T_3)) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_3)) (status T_0 T_1 T_2)   ### Imply 1 2
% 2.45/2.65  4. (All C, ((status T_0 C T_2) => (status T_0 C T_3))) (status T_0 T_1 T_2) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_3))   ### All 3
% 2.45/2.65  5. (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3)))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_3)) (status T_0 T_1 T_2)   ### All 4
% 2.45/2.65  6. (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4)) (status T_0 T_1 T_4)   ### Axiom
% 2.45/2.65  7. (-. (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4))   ### NotNot 6
% 2.45/2.65  8. (-. ((status T_0 T_1 T_3) /\ (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4)))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4)) (status T_0 T_1 T_2) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3))))   ### NotAnd 5 7
% 2.45/2.65  9. (-. (Ex C, ((status T_0 C T_3) /\ (-. (status T_0 C T_4))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3)))) (status T_0 T_1 T_2) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4))   ### NotExists 8
% 2.45/2.65  10. (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C T_3) /\ (-. (status Ax C T_4)))))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4)) (status T_0 T_1 T_2) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3))))   ### NotExists 9
% 2.45/2.65  11. (-. (nota T_3 T_4)) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3)))) (status T_0 T_1 T_2) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4))   ### Definition-Pseudo(nota) 10
% 2.45/2.65  12. ((status T_0 T_1 T_2) /\ (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4))) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3)))) (-. (nota T_3 T_4))   ### And 11
% 2.45/2.65  13. (Ex C, ((status T_0 C T_2) /\ (-. (status T_0 C T_4)))) (-. (nota T_3 T_4)) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3))))   ### Exists 12
% 2.45/2.65  14. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C T_2) /\ (-. (status Ax C T_4))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3)))) (-. (nota T_3 T_4))   ### Exists 13
% 2.45/2.65  15. (nota T_2 T_4) (-. (nota T_3 T_4)) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3))))   ### Definition-Pseudo(nota) 14
% 2.45/2.65  16. (isa T_2 T_3) (-. (nota T_3 T_4)) (nota T_2 T_4)   ### Definition-Pseudo(isa) 15
% 2.45/2.65  17. (-. (((isa T_2 T_3) /\ (nota T_2 T_4)) => (nota T_3 T_4)))   ### ConjTree 16
% 2.45/2.65  18. (-. (All S3, (((isa T_2 T_3) /\ (nota T_2 S3)) => (nota T_3 S3))))   ### NotAllEx 17
% 2.45/2.65  19. (-. (All S2, (All S3, (((isa T_2 S2) /\ (nota T_2 S3)) => (nota S2 S3)))))   ### NotAllEx 18
% 2.45/2.65  20. (-. (All S1, (All S2, (All S3, (((isa S1 S2) /\ (nota S1 S3)) => (nota S2 S3))))))   ### NotAllEx 19
% 2.45/2.65  % SZS output end Proof
% 2.45/2.65  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------