↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : KRS186+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:36:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 15.81s 9.83s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 15.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   67 (  22   ~;  30   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   0 sgn  28   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(eqv,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( ? [X3] : model(X3,X1)
        & ! [X4] :
            ( model(X4,X1)
          <=> model(X4,X2) ) )
    <=> status(X1,X2,eqv) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',eqv) ).

fof(isa,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ! [X1,X2] :
          ( status(X1,X2,X7)
         => status(X1,X2,X8) )
    <=> isa(X7,X8) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',isa) ).

fof(thm,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( model(X3,X1)
         => model(X3,X2) )
    <=> status(X1,X2,thm) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',thm) ).

fof(isa_eqv_thm,conjecture,
    isa(eqv,thm),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',isa_eqv_thm) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X173,X174,X175,X177,X178,X180,X181] :
      ( ( ~ model(esk11_2(X173,X174),X173)
        | ~ model(esk11_2(X173,X174),X174)
        | ~ model(X175,X173)
        | status(X173,X174,eqv) )
      & ( model(esk11_2(X173,X174),X173)
        | model(esk11_2(X173,X174),X174)
        | ~ model(X175,X173)
        | status(X173,X174,eqv) )
      & ( model(esk12_2(X177,X178),X177)
        | ~ status(X177,X178,eqv) )
      & ( ~ model(X180,X177)
        | model(X180,X178)
        | ~ status(X177,X178,eqv) )
      & ( ~ model(X181,X178)
        | model(X181,X177)
        | ~ status(X177,X178,eqv) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[eqv])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X303,X304,X307,X308,X309,X310] :
      ( ( status(esk45_2(X303,X304),esk46_2(X303,X304),X303)
        | isa(X303,X304) )
      & ( ~ status(esk45_2(X303,X304),esk46_2(X303,X304),X304)
        | isa(X303,X304) )
      & ( ~ isa(X307,X308)
        | ~ status(X309,X310,X307)
        | status(X309,X310,X308) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[isa])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( model(X1,X3)
    | ~ model(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(X2,X3,eqv) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( status(esk45_2(X1,X2),esk46_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | isa(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X167,X168,X170,X171,X172] :
      ( ( model(esk10_2(X167,X168),X167)
        | status(X167,X168,thm) )
      & ( ~ model(esk10_2(X167,X168),X168)
        | status(X167,X168,thm) )
      & ( ~ status(X170,X171,thm)
        | ~ model(X172,X170)
        | model(X172,X171) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( isa(eqv,X1)
    | model(X2,esk46_2(eqv,X1))
    | ~ model(X2,esk45_2(eqv,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( model(esk10_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | status(X1,X2,thm) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( status(X1,X2,thm)
    | ~ model(esk10_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( isa(eqv,X1)
    | status(esk45_2(eqv,X1),X2,thm)
    | model(esk10_2(esk45_2(eqv,X1),X2),esk46_2(eqv,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ isa(eqv,thm),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[isa_eqv_thm])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(esk45_2(X1,X2),esk46_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( isa(eqv,X1)
    | status(esk45_2(eqv,X1),esk46_2(eqv,X1),thm) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ isa(eqv,thm),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : KRS186+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:39:08 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 15.81/9.83  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 15.81/9.83  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 15.81/9.83  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 15.81/9.83  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 15.81/9.89  % Total time : 7.389s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------