%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS192+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:01:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.42s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 82 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 23 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 94 ( 33 ~; 35 |; 18 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 0 sgn 32 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(wth,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X6] : ~ model(X6,X2)
& ? [X5] :
( ~ model(X5,X1)
& model(X5,X2) )
& ! [X4] :
( model(X4,X1)
=> model(X4,X2) )
& ? [X3] : model(X3,X1) )
<=> status(X1,X2,wth) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',wth) ).
fof(isa,axiom,
! [X7,X8] :
( ! [X1,X2] :
( status(X1,X2,X7)
=> status(X1,X2,X8) )
<=> isa(X7,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',isa) ).
fof(thm,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( model(X3,X1)
=> model(X3,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,thm) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',thm) ).
fof(isa_wth_thm,conjecture,
isa(wth,thm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',isa_wth_thm) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X6] : ~ model(X6,X2)
& ? [X5] :
( ~ model(X5,X1)
& model(X5,X2) )
& ! [X4] :
( model(X4,X1)
=> model(X4,X2) )
& ? [X3] : model(X3,X1) )
<=> status(X1,X2,wth) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[wth]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X25,X26,X27,X29,X30,X31,X32,X34] :
( ( ~ status(X31,X32,wth)
| ~ model(esk7_2(X31,X32),X32) )
& ( ~ status(X31,X32,wth)
| ~ model(esk6_2(X31,X32),X31) )
& ( ~ status(X31,X32,wth)
| model(esk6_2(X31,X32),X32) )
& ( ~ status(X31,X32,wth)
| model(X34,X32)
| ~ model(X34,X31) )
& ( ~ status(X31,X32,wth)
| model(esk5_2(X31,X32),X31) )
& ( status(X25,X26,wth)
| model(X30,X26)
| model(X29,X25)
| ~ model(X29,X26)
| ~ model(X27,X25)
| ~ model(esk4_2(X25,X26),X26) )
& ( status(X25,X26,wth)
| model(X30,X26)
| model(X29,X25)
| ~ model(X29,X26)
| ~ model(X27,X25)
| model(esk4_2(X25,X26),X25) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X11,X12,X15,X16,X17,X18] :
( ( status(X17,X18,X16)
| ~ status(X17,X18,X15)
| ~ isa(X15,X16) )
& ( isa(X11,X12)
| ~ status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12) )
& ( isa(X11,X12)
| status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[isa])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X19,X20,X22,X23,X24] :
( ( model(X24,X23)
| ~ model(X24,X22)
| ~ status(X22,X23,thm) )
& ( status(X19,X20,thm)
| ~ model(esk3_2(X19,X20),X20) )
& ( status(X19,X20,thm)
| model(esk3_2(X19,X20),X19) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ status(X2,X3,wth)
| ~ model(X1,X2)
| model(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( isa(X1,X2)
| status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(wth,thm),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[isa_wth_thm]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
| status(X1,X2,thm) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ model(X2,esk1_2(wth,X1))
| model(X2,esk2_2(wth,X1))
| isa(wth,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(wth,thm),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ model(esk3_2(X2,esk2_2(wth,X1)),esk1_2(wth,X1))
| status(X2,esk2_2(wth,X1),thm)
| isa(wth,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( status(X1,X2,thm)
| model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(wth,thm),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)
| isa(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( status(esk1_2(wth,X1),esk2_2(wth,X1),thm)
| isa(wth,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(wth,thm),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS192+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:56:48 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.42/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.42/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % sh5l with pid 1945827 completed with status 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.42/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.42/0.48 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.42/0.48 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1945833 completed with status 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.42/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.42/0.48 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.42/0.48 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.42/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.42/0.48
% 0.42/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.42/0.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 33
% 0.42/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 23
% 0.42/0.48 % Initial clauses : 29
% 0.42/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 29
% 0.42/0.48 % Processed clauses : 243
% 0.42/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % ...subsumed : 16
% 0.42/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 227
% 0.42/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.42/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Generated clauses : 1835
% 0.42/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1657
% 0.42/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Paramodulations : 1835
% 0.42/0.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 186
% 0.42/0.48 % ...of those cached : 155
% 0.42/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 219
% 0.42/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.42/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 13
% 0.42/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 193
% 0.42/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1426
% 0.42/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 9788
% 0.42/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.42/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3699
% 0.42/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1372
% 0.42/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 23
% 0.42/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 44
% 0.42/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.42/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.42/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 39391
% 0.42/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 613
% 0.42/0.48
% 0.42/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.48 % User time : 0.041 s
% 0.42/0.48 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.42/0.48 % Total time : 0.051 s
% 0.42/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.42/0.48
% 0.42/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.48 % User time : 0.043 s
% 0.42/0.48 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.42/0.48 % Total time : 0.058 s
% 0.42/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.42/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------