%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : KRS194+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:36:49 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.32s 1.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 47 ( 17 ~; 18 |; 7 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 4 sgn 26 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(sca,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ ? [X3] : model(X3,X1)
& ? [X4] : model(X4,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,sca) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',sca) ).
fof(isa,axiom,
! [X7,X8] :
( ! [X1,X2] :
( status(X1,X2,X7)
=> status(X1,X2,X8) )
<=> isa(X7,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',isa) ).
fof(thm,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( model(X3,X1)
=> model(X3,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,thm) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',thm) ).
fof(isa_sca_thm,conjecture,
isa(sca,thm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',isa_sca_thm) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X247,X248,X250,X251,X252,X253] :
( ( model(esk31_2(X247,X248),X247)
| ~ model(X250,X248)
| status(X247,X248,sca) )
& ( ~ model(X253,X251)
| ~ status(X251,X252,sca) )
& ( model(esk32_2(X251,X252),X252)
| ~ status(X251,X252,sca) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sca])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X303,X304,X307,X308,X309,X310] :
( ( status(esk45_2(X303,X304),esk46_2(X303,X304),X303)
| isa(X303,X304) )
& ( ~ status(esk45_2(X303,X304),esk46_2(X303,X304),X304)
| isa(X303,X304) )
& ( ~ isa(X307,X308)
| ~ status(X309,X310,X307)
| status(X309,X310,X308) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[isa])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ model(X1,X2)
| ~ status(X2,X3,sca) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( status(esk45_2(X1,X2),esk46_2(X1,X2),X1)
| isa(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X167,X168,X170,X171,X172] :
( ( model(esk10_2(X167,X168),X167)
| status(X167,X168,thm) )
& ( ~ model(esk10_2(X167,X168),X168)
| status(X167,X168,thm) )
& ( ~ status(X170,X171,thm)
| ~ model(X172,X170)
| model(X172,X171) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( isa(sca,X1)
| ~ model(X2,esk45_2(sca,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( model(esk10_2(X1,X2),X1)
| status(X1,X2,thm) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(sca,thm),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[isa_sca_thm])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( isa(X1,X2)
| ~ status(esk45_2(X1,X2),esk46_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( isa(sca,X1)
| status(esk45_2(sca,X1),X2,thm) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(sca,thm),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : KRS194+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 4 20:39:44 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.32/1.73 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.32/1.73 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.32/1.73 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.32/1.73 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.32/1.73 % Total time : 1.374s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------