↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KRS200+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:46:18 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   31 (  15   ~;   7   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   8 sgn  10   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(unp,axiom,
    ! [Ax,C] :
      ( ( ~ ? [I1] : model(I1,Ax)
       => ~ ? [I2] : model(I2,C) )
    <=> status(Ax,C,unp) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unp) ).

fof(thm,axiom,
    ! [Ax,C] :
      ( ! [I1] :
          ( model(I1,Ax)
         => model(I1,C) )
    <=> status(Ax,C,thm) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thm) ).

fof(nota,axiom,
    ! [S1,S2] :
      ( ? [Ax,C] :
          ( ~ status(Ax,C,S2)
          & status(Ax,C,S1) )
    <=> nota(S1,S2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',nota) ).

fof(tautology,axiom,
    ? [F] :
    ! [I] : model(I,F),
    file('theBenchmark.p',tautology) ).

fof(satisfiable,axiom,
    ? [F] :
      ( ? [I2] : ~ model(I2,F)
      & ? [I1] : model(I1,F) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',satisfiable) ).

fof(nota_unp_thm,conjecture,
    nota(unp,thm),
    file('theBenchmark.p',nota_unp_thm) ).

fof(nota_unp_thm_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nota(unp,thm),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nota_unp_thm]) ).

cnf(c_41,plain,
    ( nota(C,D)
    | status(A,B,D)
    | ~ status(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[nota]) ).

cnf(c_43,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nota(unp,thm),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[nota_unp_thm_neg]) ).

cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    ( status(A,B,thm)
    | ~ status(A,B,unp) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_41]) ).

fof(nnf_28,plain,
    ? [F] :
      ( ? [I2] : ~ model(I2,F)
      & ? [I1] : model(I1,F) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[satisfiable]) ).

fof(sk_satisfiable,plain,
    ( ~ model(sK0,sK1)
    & model(sK5,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK5,sK1,sK0]),skolemize(F,sK1),skolemize(I1,sK5),skolemize(I2,sK0)],[nnf_28]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    ~ model(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_satisfiable]) ).

fof(nnf_27,plain,
    ? [F] :
    ! [I] : model(I,F),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[tautology]) ).

fof(sk_tautology,plain,
    ! [I] : model(I,sK2),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(F,sK2)],[nnf_27]) ).

cnf(c_74,plain,
    model(A,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_tautology]) ).

cnf(c_134,plain,
    ( ~ status(B,C,thm)
    | model(A,C)
    | ~ model(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[thm]) ).

cnf(c_149,plain,
    ( status(B,C,unp)
    | ~ model(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unp]) ).

cnf(c_530,plain,
    status(sK2,A,unp),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_149,c_74]) ).

cnf(c_837,plain,
    status(sK2,A,thm),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_530,c_55]) ).

cnf(c_1328,plain,
    ( model(A,B)
    | ~ model(A,sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_837,c_134]) ).

cnf(c_1326,plain,
    model(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_74,c_1328]) ).

cnf(c_1327,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1326,c_72]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : KRS200+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.43  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.43  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:44:03 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.18/0.44  % Process 941695 was started by sandbox2 on n014,
% 0.18/0.44  % Fri Sep 25 19:44:03 2026
% 0.18/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.23/0.61  
% 0.23/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.23/0.61  
% 0.23/0.61  % Proof 1 at 0.10 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 0.23/0.61  % Length of proof is 17.
% 0.23/0.61  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.23/0.61  % Maximum clause weight is 10.000.
% 0.23/0.61  % Given clauses 165.
% 0.23/0.61  
% 0.23/0.61  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------