%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KRS201+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:01:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 64 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 64 ( 25 ~; 19 |; 14 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 55 ( 5 sgn 26 !; 14 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(non_thm_spt,axiom,
? [X3,X1,X2] :
( ? [X4] : model(X4,X2)
& ~ model(X3,X2)
& model(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',non_thm_spt) ).
fof(nota,axiom,
! [X7,X8] :
( ? [X1,X2] :
( ~ status(X1,X2,X8)
& status(X1,X2,X7) )
<=> nota(X7,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',nota) ).
fof(sap,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X3] : model(X3,X1)
=> ? [X4] : model(X4,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,sap) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',sap) ).
fof(nota_sap_thm,conjecture,
nota(sap,thm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nota_sap_thm) ).
fof(thm,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( model(X3,X1)
=> model(X3,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,thm) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',thm) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
? [X3,X1,X2] :
( ? [X4] : model(X4,X2)
& ~ model(X3,X2)
& model(X3,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[non_thm_spt]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ? [X1,X2] :
( ~ status(X1,X2,X8)
& status(X1,X2,X7) )
<=> nota(X7,X8) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[nota]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X25,X26,X28,X29,X30,X31] :
( ( model(esk5_2(X29,X30),X30)
| ~ model(X31,X29)
| ~ status(X29,X30,sap) )
& ( status(X25,X26,sap)
| ~ model(X28,X26) )
& ( status(X25,X26,sap)
| model(esk4_2(X25,X26),X25) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sap])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( model(esk23_0,esk22_0)
& ~ model(esk20_0,esk22_0)
& model(esk20_0,esk21_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ nota(sap,thm),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nota_sap_thm]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16] :
( ( ~ nota(X15,X16)
| ~ status(esk1_2(X15,X16),esk2_2(X15,X16),X16) )
& ( ~ nota(X15,X16)
| status(esk1_2(X15,X16),esk2_2(X15,X16),X15) )
& ( nota(X11,X12)
| status(X13,X14,X12)
| ~ status(X13,X14,X11) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ model(X1,X2)
| status(X3,X2,sap) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
model(esk23_0,esk22_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ nota(sap,thm),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X19,X20,X22,X23,X24] :
( ( model(X24,X23)
| ~ model(X24,X22)
| ~ status(X22,X23,thm) )
& ( status(X19,X20,thm)
| ~ model(esk3_2(X19,X20),X20) )
& ( status(X19,X20,thm)
| model(esk3_2(X19,X20),X19) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ status(X1,X2,X3)
| nota(X3,X4)
| status(X1,X2,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
status(X1,esk22_0,sap),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ nota(sap,thm),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ model(X3,X1)
| ~ status(X1,X2,thm)
| model(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( status(X2,esk22_0,X1)
| nota(sap,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ nota(sap,thm),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ model(X1,X2)
| model(X1,esk22_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
model(esk20_0,esk21_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
~ model(esk20_0,esk22_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KRS201+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:56:40 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % new_bool_1 with pid 379066 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 379069 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 33
% 0.12/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 23
% 0.12/0.44 % Initial clauses : 25
% 0.12/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 25
% 0.12/0.44 % Processed clauses : 53
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.12/0.44 % ...subsumed : 4
% 0.12/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.12/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Generated clauses : 66
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 52
% 0.12/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Paramodulations : 64
% 0.12/0.44 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.12/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 47
% 0.12/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 0.12/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.12/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 0.12/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 59
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18
% 0.12/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.12/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.12/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.12/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 30
% 0.12/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2265
% 0.12/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 522
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.44 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.44 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------