↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : KRS201+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.q7Az1IU6M2 true

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:40:48 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.54s 0.85s
% Output   : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  111 (  13   ~;   9   |;   2   &;  82   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   0   ^;  28   !;   8   ?;  36   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__51_type,type,
    sk__51: $i ).

thf(thm_type,type,
    thm: $i ).

thf(sk__54_type,type,
    sk__54: $i ).

thf(sk__53_type,type,
    sk__53: $i ).

thf(status_type,type,
    status: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(model_type,type,
    model: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sap_type,type,
    sap: $i ).

thf(nota_type,type,
    nota: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk__52_type,type,
    sk__52: $i ).

thf(satisfiable,axiom,
    ? [F: $i] :
      ( ? [I2: $i] :
          ~ ( model @ I2 @ F )
      & ? [I1: $i] : ( model @ I1 @ F ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl95,plain,
    ~ ( model @ sk__53 @ sk__52 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satisfiable]) ).

thf(tautology,axiom,
    ? [F: $i] :
    ! [I: $i] : ( model @ I @ F ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl93,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( model @ X0 @ sk__51 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[tautology]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl94,plain,
    model @ sk__54 @ sk__52,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satisfiable]) ).

thf(sap,axiom,
    ! [Ax: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ? [I1: $i] : ( model @ I1 @ Ax )
       => ? [I2: $i] : ( model @ I2 @ C ) )
    <=> ( status @ Ax @ C @ sap ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( status @ X0 @ X1 @ sap )
      | ~ ( model @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[sap]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl139,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( status @ X0 @ sk__52 @ sap ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl94,zip_derived_cl3]) ).

thf(nota,axiom,
    ! [S1: $i,S2: $i] :
      ( ? [Ax: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ~ ( status @ Ax @ C @ S2 )
          & ( status @ Ax @ C @ S1 ) )
    <=> ( nota @ S1 @ S2 ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl79,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( nota @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( status @ X2 @ X3 @ X0 )
      | ( status @ X2 @ X3 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[nota]) ).

thf(nota_sap_thm,conjecture,
    nota @ sap @ thm ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( nota @ sap @ thm ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[nota_sap_thm]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl108,plain,
    ~ ( nota @ sap @ thm ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl117,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( status @ X1 @ X0 @ thm )
      | ~ ( status @ X1 @ X0 @ sap ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl79,zip_derived_cl108]) ).

thf(thm,axiom,
    ! [Ax: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ! [I1: $i] :
          ( ( model @ I1 @ Ax )
         => ( model @ I1 @ C ) )
    <=> ( status @ Ax @ C @ thm ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl15,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ~ ( model @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ( model @ X0 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( status @ X1 @ X2 @ thm ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[thm]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl222,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ~ ( status @ X1 @ X0 @ sap )
      | ( model @ X2 @ X0 )
      | ~ ( model @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl117,zip_derived_cl15]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl283,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( model @ X1 @ X0 )
      | ( model @ X1 @ sk__52 ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl139,zip_derived_cl222]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl292,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( model @ X0 @ sk__52 ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl93,zip_derived_cl283]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl307,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl95,zip_derived_cl292]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.13  % Problem  : KRS201+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.q7Az1IU6M2 true
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 11:50:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.51/0.64  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.51/0.64  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.51/0.64  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.51/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.51/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.51/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.51/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.51/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.51/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.51/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.54/0.85  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.54/0.85  % BCE start: 109
% 0.54/0.85  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.54/0.85  % PE start: 109
% 0.54/0.85  logic: neq
% 0.54/0.85  % PE eliminated: 4
% 0.54/0.85  % done 109 iterations in 0.086s
% 0.54/0.85  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.54/0.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.54/0.85  
% 0.54/0.85  
% 0.54/0.85  % Terminating...
% 0.58/0.98  % Runner terminated.
% 1.54/0.99  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------