%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : KRS202+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:36:50 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.42s 1.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 72 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 72 ( 27 ~; 24 |; 15 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 61 ( 5 sgn 30 !; 15 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(non_thm_spt,axiom,
? [X3,X1,X2] :
( model(X3,X1)
& ~ model(X3,X2)
& ? [X4] : model(X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',non_thm_spt) ).
fof(esa,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X3] : model(X3,X1)
<=> ? [X4] : model(X4,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,esa) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',esa) ).
fof(nota,axiom,
! [X7,X8] :
( ? [X1,X2] :
( status(X1,X2,X7)
& ~ status(X1,X2,X8) )
<=> nota(X7,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',nota) ).
fof(tautology,axiom,
? [X10] :
! [X9] : model(X9,X10),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',tautology) ).
fof(nota_esa_thm,conjecture,
nota(esa,thm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nota_esa_thm) ).
fof(thm,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( model(X3,X1)
=> model(X3,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,thm) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',thm) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
? [X3,X1,X2] :
( model(X3,X1)
& ~ model(X3,X2)
& ? [X4] : model(X4,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[non_thm_spt]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X149,X150,X151,X152,X155,X156,X157,X159] :
( ( ~ model(X151,X149)
| ~ model(X152,X150)
| status(X149,X150,esa) )
& ( model(esk5_2(X149,X150),X149)
| model(esk6_2(X149,X150),X150)
| status(X149,X150,esa) )
& ( ~ model(X157,X155)
| model(esk7_2(X155,X156),X156)
| ~ status(X155,X156,esa) )
& ( ~ model(X159,X156)
| model(esk8_2(X155,X156),X155)
| ~ status(X155,X156,esa) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[esa])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( model(esk67_0,esk68_0)
& ~ model(esk67_0,esk69_0)
& model(esk70_0,esk69_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ? [X1,X2] :
( status(X1,X2,X7)
& ~ status(X1,X2,X8) )
<=> nota(X7,X8) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[nota]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( status(X2,X4,esa)
| ~ model(X1,X2)
| ~ model(X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
model(esk70_0,esk69_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X342] : model(X342,esk53_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[tautology])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X311,X312,X313,X314,X315,X316] :
( ( ~ status(X313,X314,X311)
| status(X313,X314,X312)
| nota(X311,X312) )
& ( status(esk47_2(X315,X316),esk48_2(X315,X316),X315)
| ~ nota(X315,X316) )
& ( ~ status(esk47_2(X315,X316),esk48_2(X315,X316),X316)
| ~ nota(X315,X316) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( status(X1,esk69_0,esa)
| ~ model(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
model(X1,esk53_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ nota(esa,thm),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nota_esa_thm])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( status(X1,X2,X4)
| nota(X3,X4)
| ~ status(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
status(esk53_0,esk69_0,esa),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X167,X168,X170,X171,X172] :
( ( model(esk10_2(X167,X168),X167)
| status(X167,X168,thm) )
& ( ~ model(esk10_2(X167,X168),X168)
| status(X167,X168,thm) )
& ( ~ status(X170,X171,thm)
| ~ model(X172,X170)
| model(X172,X171) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ nota(esa,thm),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( nota(esa,X1)
| status(esk53_0,esk69_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( model(X3,X2)
| ~ status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ model(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
status(esk53_0,esk69_0,thm),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
~ model(esk67_0,esk69_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
model(X1,esk69_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : KRS202+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.32 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 4 20:40:26 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.42/1.76 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.42/1.76 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.42/1.76 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.42/1.76 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.42/1.76 % Total time : 1.374s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------