↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KRS233+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:46:20 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 81.45s 11.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 81.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   78 (  31   ~;  28   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   0 sgn  40   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm,axiom,
    ! [Ax,C] :
      ( ! [I1] :
          ( model(I1,Ax)
         => model(I1,C) )
    <=> status(Ax,C,thm) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thm) ).

fof(csa,axiom,
    ! [Ax,C] :
      ( ? [I1] :
          ( model(I1,not(C))
          & model(I1,Ax) )
    <=> status(Ax,C,csa) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',csa) ).

fof(nevera,axiom,
    ! [S1,S2] :
      ( ! [Ax,C] :
          ( status(Ax,C,S1)
         => ~ status(Ax,C,S2) )
    <=> nevera(S1,S2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',nevera) ).

fof(not,axiom,
    ! [I,F] :
      ( model(I,F)
    <=> ~ model(I,not(F)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',not) ).

fof(nevera_csa_thm,conjecture,
    nevera(csa,thm),
    file('theBenchmark.p',nevera_csa_thm) ).

fof(nevera_csa_thm_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nevera(csa,thm),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nevera_csa_thm]) ).

fof(nnf_23,plain,
    ! [S1,S2] :
      ( ( ~ nevera(S1,S2)
        | ! [Ax,C] :
            ( ~ status(Ax,C,S2)
            | ~ status(Ax,C,S1) ) )
      & ( nevera(S1,S2)
        | ? [X0,X1] :
            ( status(X0,X1,S2)
            & status(X0,X1,S1) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[nevera]) ).

fof(sk_nevera_sk,plain,
    ! [S1,S2] :
      ( ( ~ nevera(S1,S2)
        | ! [Ax,C] :
            ( ~ status(Ax,C,S2)
            | ~ status(Ax,C,S1) ) )
      & ( nevera(S1,S2)
        | ( status(sK0(S1,S2),sK1(S1,S2),S2)
          & status(sK0(S1,S2),sK1(S1,S2),S1) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0(S1,S2)),skolemize(X1,sK1(S1,S2))],[nnf_23]) ).

fof(sk_nevera,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( ~ nevera(VAR_2,VAR_3)
        | ~ status(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_3)
        | ~ status(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( nevera(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | status(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),sK1(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( nevera(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | status(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),sK1(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_nevera_sk]) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    ( nevera(A,B)
    | status(sK0(A,B),sK1(A,B),B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_nevera]) ).

cnf(c_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nevera(csa,thm),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[nevera_csa_thm_neg]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    ( nevera(A,B)
    | status(sK0(A,B),sK1(A,B),A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_nevera]) ).

cnf(c_75,plain,
    ( ~ model(A,not(B))
    | ~ model(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[not]) ).

fof(nnf_17,plain,
    ! [Ax,C] :
      ( ( ~ status(Ax,C,csa)
        | ? [I1] :
            ( model(I1,not(C))
            & model(I1,Ax) ) )
      & ( status(Ax,C,csa)
        | ! [X0] :
            ( ~ model(X0,not(C))
            | ~ model(X0,Ax) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[csa]) ).

fof(sk_csa_sk,plain,
    ! [Ax,C] :
      ( ( ~ status(Ax,C,csa)
        | ( model(sK2(Ax,C),not(C))
          & model(sK2(Ax,C),Ax) ) )
      & ( status(Ax,C,csa)
        | ! [X0] :
            ( ~ model(X0,not(C))
            | ~ model(X0,Ax) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(I1,sK2(Ax,C))],[nnf_17]) ).

fof(sk_csa,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ status(VAR_0,VAR_1,csa)
        | model(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),not(VAR_1)) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ status(VAR_0,VAR_1,csa)
        | model(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( status(VAR_1,VAR_2,csa)
        | ~ model(VAR_0,not(VAR_2))
        | ~ model(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_csa_sk]) ).

cnf(c_84,plain,
    ( ~ status(A,B,csa)
    | model(sK2(A,B),not(B)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_csa]) ).

cnf(c_85,plain,
    ( ~ status(A,B,csa)
    | model(sK2(A,B),A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_csa]) ).

cnf(c_133,plain,
    ( ~ status(B,C,thm)
    | model(A,C)
    | ~ model(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[thm]) ).

cnf(c_152,negated_conjecture,
    status(sK0(csa,thm),sK1(csa,thm),thm),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_154,negated_conjecture,
    status(sK0(csa,thm),sK1(csa,thm),csa),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_567,plain,
    ( model(A,sK1(csa,thm))
    | ~ model(A,sK0(csa,thm)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_152,c_133]) ).

cnf(c_596,plain,
    model(sK2(sK0(csa,thm),sK1(csa,thm)),sK0(csa,thm)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_154,c_85]) ).

cnf(c_597,plain,
    model(sK2(sK0(csa,thm),sK1(csa,thm)),not(sK1(csa,thm))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_154,c_84]) ).

cnf(c_29689,plain,
    model(sK2(sK0(csa,thm),sK1(csa,thm)),sK1(csa,thm)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_596,c_567]) ).

cnf(c_29779,plain,
    ~ model(sK2(sK0(csa,thm),sK1(csa,thm)),sK1(csa,thm)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_597,c_75]) ).

cnf(c_29778,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_29689,c_29779]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : KRS233+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.44  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:50:06 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.18/0.45  % Process 2696257 was started by sandbox on n018,
% 0.18/0.45  % Fri Sep 25 19:50:06 2026
% 0.18/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 81.45/11.70  
% 81.45/11.70  % given #500 (A,wt=14): 257 model(f30(A,not(B)),A) | status(A,not(B),sca) | model(C,B).  [resolve(96,b,74,b)].
% 81.45/11.70  
% 81.45/11.70  % given #1000 (A,wt=15): 358 -model(A,B) | -model(f15(B,c7),c7) | model(c8,B) | status(B,c7,wec).  [resolve(123,c,68,a)].
% 81.45/11.70  
% 81.45/11.70  % given #1500 (A,wt=27): 510 model(f3(f50(sap,A),f51(sap,A)),f50(sap,A)) | -status(B,C,sap) | -status(B,C,A) | status(f50(sap,A),f51(sap,A),A).  [resolve(145,b,51,c)].
% 81.45/11.70  
% 81.45/11.70  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 81.45/11.70  
% 81.45/11.70  % Proof 1 at 7.44 (+ 3.68) seconds.
% 81.45/11.70  % Length of proof is 19.
% 81.45/11.70  % Level of proof is 5.
% 81.45/11.70  % Maximum clause weight is 12.000.
% 81.45/11.70  % Given clauses 1868.
% 81.45/11.70  
% 81.45/11.70  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------