↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : KRS234+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:01:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (  28   ~;  26   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   62 (   8 sgn  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(nevera,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ! [X1,X2] :
          ( status(X1,X2,X7)
         => ~ status(X1,X2,X8) )
    <=> nevera(X7,X8) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',nevera) ).

fof(completeness,axiom,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ( model(X9,X10)
    <~> model(X9,not(X10)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',completeness) ).

fof(uns,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( ! [X4] : model(X4,not(X2))
        & ! [X3] : model(X3,X1) )
    <=> status(X1,X2,uns) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',uns) ).

fof(nevera_uns_thm,conjecture,
    nevera(uns,thm),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nevera_uns_thm) ).

fof(thm,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( model(X3,X1)
         => model(X3,X2) )
    <=> status(X1,X2,thm) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',thm) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ! [X1,X2] :
          ( status(X1,X2,X7)
         => ~ status(X1,X2,X8) )
    <=> nevera(X7,X8) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[nevera]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ~ ( model(X9,X10)
      <=> model(X9,not(X10)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[completeness]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X25,X26,X29,X30,X31,X32] :
      ( ( ~ status(X29,X30,uns)
        | model(X32,not(X30)) )
      & ( ~ status(X29,X30,uns)
        | model(X31,X29) )
      & ( status(X25,X26,uns)
        | ~ model(esk5_2(X25,X26),not(X26))
        | ~ model(esk4_2(X25,X26),X25) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[uns])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X11,X12,X15,X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ( ~ status(X17,X18,X16)
        | ~ status(X17,X18,X15)
        | ~ nevera(X15,X16) )
      & ( nevera(X11,X12)
        | status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12) )
      & ( nevera(X11,X12)
        | status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nevera(uns,thm),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nevera_uns_thm]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X54,X55] :
      ( ( model(X54,not(X55))
        | model(X54,X55) )
      & ( ~ model(X54,not(X55))
        | ~ model(X54,X55) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ status(X3,X2,uns)
    | model(X1,not(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( nevera(X1,X2)
    | status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X19,X20,X22,X23,X24] :
      ( ( model(X24,X23)
        | ~ model(X24,X22)
        | ~ status(X22,X23,thm) )
      & ( status(X19,X20,thm)
        | ~ model(esk3_2(X19,X20),X20) )
      & ( status(X19,X20,thm)
        | model(esk3_2(X19,X20),X19) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nevera(uns,thm),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ model(X1,not(X2))
    | ~ model(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( model(X2,not(esk2_2(uns,X1)))
    | nevera(uns,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ model(X3,X1)
    | ~ status(X1,X2,thm)
    | model(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( nevera(X1,X2)
    | status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nevera(uns,thm),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ model(X2,esk2_2(uns,X1))
    | nevera(uns,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ model(X2,esk1_2(X1,thm))
    | model(X2,esk2_2(X1,thm))
    | nevera(X1,thm) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nevera(uns,thm),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ status(X2,X3,uns)
    | model(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ~ model(X1,esk1_2(uns,thm)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( model(X2,esk1_2(uns,X1))
    | nevera(uns,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_22]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KRS234+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:52:43 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.55  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.22/0.55  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  % new_bool_1 with pid 815374 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.22/0.55  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.22/0.55  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.55  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.55  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.55  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  % SubtermCWHack with pid 815383 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.22/0.55  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.22/0.55  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.55  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.55  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.55  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  % Proof found!
% 0.22/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.55  % Parsed axioms                        : 33
% 0.22/0.55  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 21
% 0.22/0.55  % Initial clauses                      : 29
% 0.22/0.55  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 29
% 0.22/0.55  % Processed clauses                    : 91
% 0.22/0.55  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.22/0.55  % ...subsumed                          : 25
% 0.22/0.55  % ...remaining for further processing  : 65
% 0.22/0.55  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.22/0.55  % Generated clauses                    : 120
% 0.22/0.55  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 106
% 0.22/0.55  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Paramodulations                      : 120
% 0.22/0.55  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Total rewrite steps                  : 19
% 0.22/0.55  % ...of those cached                   : 2
% 0.22/0.55  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.55  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.55  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.55  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.55  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.55  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.55  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  % Current number of processed clauses  : 58
% 0.22/0.55  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 15
% 0.22/0.55  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.55  %    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.22/0.55  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 34
% 0.22/0.55  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 42
% 0.22/0.55  % ...number of literals in the above   : 103
% 0.22/0.55  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.22/0.55  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 59
% 0.22/0.55  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 56
% 0.22/0.55  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.22/0.55  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.22/0.55  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 12
% 0.22/0.55  % BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 0.22/0.55  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.55  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3136
% 0.22/0.55  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 540
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  % User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.22/0.55  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.55  % Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.22/0.55  % Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  % User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.22/0.55  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.22/0.55  % Total time               : 0.027 s
% 0.22/0.55  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.22/0.55  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------