↑ Up

SRASS---0.1.THM-Sol.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : KRS234+1 : TPTP v5.3.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : glendale.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU          6600  @ 2.40GHz @ 2400MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jun 15 10:53:15 EDT 2012

% Result   : Theorem 0.57s
% Output   : Solution 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5365/KRS234+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5365/KRS234+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5365/KRS234+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.5/eproof_ram --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-format /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 5463
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Auto-Ordering is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GHNFNFFMM21LS
% # Auto-mode selected ordering type KBO6
% # Auto-mode selected ordering precedence scheme <invfreq>
% # Auto-mode selected weight ordering scheme <invfreqrank>
% #
% # Auto-Heuristic is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GHNFNFFMM21LS
% # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___006_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S2S
% # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% #
% # No equality, disabling AC handling.
% #
% # Initializing proof state
% # Proof found!
% # SZS status Theorem
% # Parsed axioms                      : 33
% # Removed by relevancy pruning       : 0
% # Initial clauses                    : 109
% # Removed in clause preprocessing    : 0
% # Initial clauses in saturation      : 109
% # Processed clauses                  : 1563
% # ...of these trivial                : 160
% # ...subsumed                        : 63
% # ...remaining for further processing: 1340
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 1
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 1
% # Generated clauses                  : 10853
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6959
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 10849
% # Factorizations                     : 4
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 1338
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 320
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 190
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 828
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5447
% # ...number of literals in the above : 12992
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 76205
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 66225
% # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions: 18
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28714
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # BW rewrite match attempts          : 459
% # BW rewrite match successes         : 2
% # Backwards rewriting index :  4122 nodes,   804 leaves,   1.66+/-2.715 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index      :  1700 nodes,   345 leaves,   1.16+/-0.671 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index      :  2851 nodes,   538 leaves,   1.13+/-0.571 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-neg-atom index  :   989 nodes,   207 leaves,   2.18+/-3.170 terms/leaf
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(![X3]:![X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)=>~(status(X3,X4,X2)))<=>nevera(X1,X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', nevera)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X3]:![X4]:(![X5]:(model(X5,X3)=>model(X5,X4))<=>status(X3,X4,thm)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', thm)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X6]:![X7]:(model(X6,X7)<~>model(X6,not(X7))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', completeness)).
% fof(11, axiom,![X3]:![X4]:((![X5]:model(X5,X3)&![X8]:model(X8,not(X4)))<=>status(X3,X4,uns)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', uns)).
% fof(33, conjecture,nevera(uns,thm),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', nevera_uns_thm)).
% fof(34, negated_conjecture,~(nevera(uns,thm)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[33])).
% fof(35, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(![X3]:![X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)=>~(status(X3,X4,X2)))<=>nevera(X1,X2)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[1,theory(equality)])).
% fof(36, plain,![X6]:![X7]:~((model(X6,X7)<=>model(X6,not(X7)))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[3,theory(equality)])).
% fof(50, negated_conjecture,~(nevera(uns,thm)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[34,theory(equality)])).
% fof(51, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((?[X3]:?[X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)&status(X3,X4,X2))|nevera(X1,X2))&(~(nevera(X1,X2))|![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,X1))|~(status(X3,X4,X2))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[35])).
% fof(52, plain,(![X1]:![X2]:(?[X3]:?[X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)&status(X3,X4,X2))|nevera(X1,X2))&![X1]:![X2]:(~(nevera(X1,X2))|![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,X1))|~(status(X3,X4,X2))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[51])).
% fof(53, plain,(![X5]:![X6]:(?[X7]:?[X8]:(status(X7,X8,X5)&status(X7,X8,X6))|nevera(X5,X6))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(nevera(X9,X10))|![X11]:![X12]:(~(status(X11,X12,X9))|~(status(X11,X12,X10))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[52])).
% fof(54, plain,(![X5]:![X6]:((status(esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6),X5)&status(esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6),X6))|nevera(X5,X6))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(nevera(X9,X10))|![X11]:![X12]:(~(status(X11,X12,X9))|~(status(X11,X12,X10))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[53])).
% fof(55, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:![X12]:(((status(esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6),X5)&status(esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6),X6))|nevera(X5,X6))&(~(nevera(X9,X10))|(~(status(X11,X12,X9))|~(status(X11,X12,X10))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[54])).
% fof(56, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:![X12]:(((status(esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6),X5)|nevera(X5,X6))&(status(esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6),X6)|nevera(X5,X6)))&(~(nevera(X9,X10))|(~(status(X11,X12,X9))|~(status(X11,X12,X10))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[55])).
% cnf(58,plain,(nevera(X1,X2)|status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[56])).
% cnf(59,plain,(nevera(X1,X2)|status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[56])).
% fof(60, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((?[X5]:(model(X5,X3)&~(model(X5,X4)))|status(X3,X4,thm))&(~(status(X3,X4,thm))|![X5]:(~(model(X5,X3))|model(X5,X4)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(61, plain,(![X3]:![X4]:(?[X5]:(model(X5,X3)&~(model(X5,X4)))|status(X3,X4,thm))&![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,thm))|![X5]:(~(model(X5,X3))|model(X5,X4)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[60])).
% fof(62, plain,(![X6]:![X7]:(?[X8]:(model(X8,X6)&~(model(X8,X7)))|status(X6,X7,thm))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|![X11]:(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[61])).
% fof(63, plain,(![X6]:![X7]:((model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X6)&~(model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X7)))|status(X6,X7,thm))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|![X11]:(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[62])).
% fof(64, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:(((model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X6)&~(model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X7)))|status(X6,X7,thm))&(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[63])).
% fof(65, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:(((model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X6)|status(X6,X7,thm))&(~(model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X7))|status(X6,X7,thm)))&(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[64])).
% cnf(66,plain,(model(X1,X2)|~model(X1,X3)|~status(X3,X2,thm)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[65])).
% fof(69, plain,![X6]:![X7]:((~(model(X6,X7))|~(model(X6,not(X7))))&(model(X6,X7)|model(X6,not(X7)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[36])).
% fof(70, plain,(![X6]:![X7]:(~(model(X6,X7))|~(model(X6,not(X7))))&![X6]:![X7]:(model(X6,X7)|model(X6,not(X7)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[69])).
% fof(71, plain,(![X8]:![X9]:(~(model(X8,X9))|~(model(X8,not(X9))))&![X10]:![X11]:(model(X10,X11)|model(X10,not(X11)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[70])).
% fof(72, plain,![X8]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:((~(model(X8,X9))|~(model(X8,not(X9))))&(model(X10,X11)|model(X10,not(X11)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[71])).
% cnf(74,plain,(~model(X1,not(X2))|~model(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[72])).
% fof(111, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(((?[X5]:~(model(X5,X3))|?[X8]:~(model(X8,not(X4))))|status(X3,X4,uns))&(~(status(X3,X4,uns))|(![X5]:model(X5,X3)&![X8]:model(X8,not(X4))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11])).
% fof(112, plain,(![X3]:![X4]:((?[X5]:~(model(X5,X3))|?[X8]:~(model(X8,not(X4))))|status(X3,X4,uns))&![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,uns))|(![X5]:model(X5,X3)&![X8]:model(X8,not(X4))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[111])).
% fof(113, plain,(![X9]:![X10]:((?[X11]:~(model(X11,X9))|?[X12]:~(model(X12,not(X10))))|status(X9,X10,uns))&![X13]:![X14]:(~(status(X13,X14,uns))|(![X15]:model(X15,X13)&![X16]:model(X16,not(X14))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[112])).
% fof(114, plain,(![X9]:![X10]:((~(model(esk23_2(X9,X10),X9))|~(model(esk24_2(X9,X10),not(X10))))|status(X9,X10,uns))&![X13]:![X14]:(~(status(X13,X14,uns))|(![X15]:model(X15,X13)&![X16]:model(X16,not(X14))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[113])).
% fof(115, plain,![X9]:![X10]:![X13]:![X14]:![X15]:![X16]:(((~(model(esk23_2(X9,X10),X9))|~(model(esk24_2(X9,X10),not(X10))))|status(X9,X10,uns))&(~(status(X13,X14,uns))|(model(X15,X13)&model(X16,not(X14))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[114])).
% fof(116, plain,![X9]:![X10]:![X13]:![X14]:![X15]:![X16]:(((~(model(esk23_2(X9,X10),X9))|~(model(esk24_2(X9,X10),not(X10))))|status(X9,X10,uns))&((model(X15,X13)|~(status(X13,X14,uns)))&(model(X16,not(X14))|~(status(X13,X14,uns))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[115])).
% cnf(117,plain,(model(X3,not(X2))|~status(X1,X2,uns)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[116])).
% cnf(118,plain,(model(X3,X1)|~status(X1,X2,uns)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[116])).
% cnf(325,negated_conjecture,(~nevera(uns,thm)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[50])).
% cnf(427,plain,(model(X1,esk2_2(X2,thm))|nevera(X2,thm)|~model(X1,esk1_2(X2,thm))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[66,58,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(489,plain,(model(X1,esk1_2(uns,X2))|nevera(uns,X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[118,59,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(495,plain,(model(X1,not(esk2_2(uns,X2)))|nevera(uns,X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[117,59,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(15400,plain,(model(X1,esk2_2(uns,thm))|nevera(uns,thm)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[427,489,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(15412,plain,(model(X1,esk2_2(uns,thm))),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[15400,325,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(16490,plain,(nevera(uns,X2)|~model(X1,esk2_2(uns,X2))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[74,495,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(16512,plain,(nevera(uns,thm)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[16490,15412,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(16523,plain,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[16512,325,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(16524,plain,($false),16523,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% PrfWatch: 0.28 CPU 0.22 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.28 CPU 0.22 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5365/KRS234+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------