%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : KRS235+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:36:52 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 21.02s 12.80s
% Output : CNFRefutation 21.02s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 76 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 13 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 80 ( 29 ~; 30 |; 12 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 1 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 56 ( 0 sgn 36 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(nevera,axiom,
! [X7,X8] :
( ! [X1,X2] :
( status(X1,X2,X7)
=> ~ status(X1,X2,X8) )
<=> nevera(X7,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',nevera) ).
fof(completeness,axiom,
! [X9,X10] :
( model(X9,X10)
<~> model(X9,not(X10)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',completeness) ).
fof(noc,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X3] :
( model(X3,X1)
& model(X3,X2) )
& ? [X4] :
( model(X4,X1)
& model(X4,not(X2)) ) )
<=> status(X1,X2,noc) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',noc) ).
fof(thm,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( model(X3,X1)
=> model(X3,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,thm) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',thm) ).
fof(nevera_noc_thm,conjecture,
nevera(noc,thm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nevera_noc_thm) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ! [X1,X2] :
( status(X1,X2,X7)
=> ~ status(X1,X2,X8) )
<=> nevera(X7,X8) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[nevera]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X9,X10] :
~ ( model(X9,X10)
<=> model(X9,not(X10)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[completeness]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X287,X288,X289,X290,X291,X292] :
( ( ~ model(X289,X287)
| ~ model(X289,X288)
| ~ model(X290,X287)
| ~ model(X290,not(X288))
| status(X287,X288,noc) )
& ( model(esk41_2(X291,X292),X291)
| ~ status(X291,X292,noc) )
& ( model(esk41_2(X291,X292),X292)
| ~ status(X291,X292,noc) )
& ( model(esk42_2(X291,X292),X291)
| ~ status(X291,X292,noc) )
& ( model(esk42_2(X291,X292),not(X292))
| ~ status(X291,X292,noc) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[noc])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X319,X320,X323,X324,X325,X326] :
( ( status(esk49_2(X319,X320),esk50_2(X319,X320),X319)
| nevera(X319,X320) )
& ( status(esk49_2(X319,X320),esk50_2(X319,X320),X320)
| nevera(X319,X320) )
& ( ~ nevera(X323,X324)
| ~ status(X325,X326,X323)
| ~ status(X325,X326,X324) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X167,X168,X170,X171,X172] :
( ( model(esk10_2(X167,X168),X167)
| status(X167,X168,thm) )
& ( ~ model(esk10_2(X167,X168),X168)
| status(X167,X168,thm) )
& ( ~ status(X170,X171,thm)
| ~ model(X172,X170)
| model(X172,X171) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X337,X338] :
( ( ~ model(X337,X338)
| ~ model(X337,not(X338)) )
& ( model(X337,X338)
| model(X337,not(X338)) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( model(esk42_2(X1,X2),not(X2))
| ~ status(X1,X2,noc) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( status(esk49_2(X1,X2),esk50_2(X1,X2),X1)
| nevera(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( model(X3,X2)
| ~ status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ model(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( status(esk49_2(X1,X2),esk50_2(X1,X2),X2)
| nevera(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( model(esk42_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ status(X1,X2,noc) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ nevera(noc,thm),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nevera_noc_thm])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ model(X1,X2)
| ~ model(X1,not(X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( nevera(noc,X1)
| model(esk42_2(esk49_2(noc,X1),esk50_2(noc,X1)),not(esk50_2(noc,X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( nevera(X1,thm)
| model(X2,esk50_2(X1,thm))
| ~ model(X2,esk49_2(X1,thm)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( nevera(noc,X1)
| model(esk42_2(esk49_2(noc,X1),esk50_2(noc,X1)),esk49_2(noc,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ nevera(noc,thm),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( nevera(noc,X1)
| ~ model(esk42_2(esk49_2(noc,X1),esk50_2(noc,X1)),esk50_2(noc,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
model(esk42_2(esk49_2(noc,thm),esk50_2(noc,thm)),esk50_2(noc,thm)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : KRS235+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.32 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 4 20:41:12 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.33 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 21.02/12.80 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 21.02/12.80 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 21.02/12.80 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 21.02/12.80 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 21.02/12.88 % Total time : 9.383s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------