%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : KRS254+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eU4ElssQgD true
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:40:52 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 0.59s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 9 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 99 ( 13 ~; 6 |; 1 &; 74 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 ^; 25 !; 5 ?; 30 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__51_type,type,
sk__51: $i ).
thf(thm_type,type,
thm: $i ).
thf(status_type,type,
status: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__9_type,type,
sk__9: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(unp_type,type,
unp: $i ).
thf(model_type,type,
model: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(mighta_type,type,
mighta: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(thm,axiom,
! [Ax: $i,C: $i] :
( ! [I1: $i] :
( ( model @ I1 @ Ax )
=> ( model @ I1 @ C ) )
<=> ( status @ Ax @ C @ thm ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl13,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( status @ X0 @ X1 @ thm )
| ~ ( model @ ( sk__9 @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[thm]) ).
thf(mighta,axiom,
! [S1: $i,S2: $i] :
( ? [Ax: $i,C: $i] :
( ( status @ Ax @ C @ S2 )
& ( status @ Ax @ C @ S1 ) )
<=> ( mighta @ S1 @ S2 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl73,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( mighta @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( status @ X2 @ X3 @ X0 )
| ~ ( status @ X2 @ X3 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[mighta]) ).
thf(mighta_unp_thm,conjecture,
mighta @ unp @ thm ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mighta @ unp @ thm ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[mighta_unp_thm]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl108,plain,
~ ( mighta @ unp @ thm ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl117,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( status @ X1 @ X0 @ thm )
| ~ ( status @ X1 @ X0 @ unp ) ),
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl73,zip_derived_cl108]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl223,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( model @ ( sk__9 @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X0 )
| ~ ( status @ X1 @ X0 @ unp ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl13,zip_derived_cl117]) ).
thf(tautology,axiom,
? [F: $i] :
! [I: $i] : ( model @ I @ F ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl93,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ( model @ X0 @ sk__51 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[tautology]) ).
thf(unp,axiom,
! [Ax: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ~ ? [I1: $i] : ( model @ I1 @ Ax )
=> ~ ? [I2: $i] : ( model @ I2 @ C ) )
<=> ( status @ Ax @ C @ unp ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( status @ X0 @ X1 @ unp )
| ~ ( model @ X2 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[unp]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl122,plain,
! [X1: $i] : ( status @ sk__51 @ X1 @ unp ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl93,zip_derived_cl1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl229,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
~ ( model @ ( sk__9 @ X0 @ sk__51 ) @ X0 ),
inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl223,zip_derived_cl122]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl93_001,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ( model @ X0 @ sk__51 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[tautology]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl262,plain,
$false,
inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl229,zip_derived_cl93]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : KRS254+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eU4ElssQgD true
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 11:53:23 EDT 2025
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.57/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.57/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.57/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.59/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.59/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.80 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.59/0.80 % BCE start: 109
% 0.59/0.80 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.59/0.80 % PE start: 109
% 0.59/0.80 logic: neq
% 0.59/0.80 % PE eliminated: 4
% 0.59/0.80 % done 95 iterations in 0.045s
% 0.59/0.80 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.59/0.80 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.80
% 0.59/0.80
% 0.59/0.80 % Terminating...
% 1.67/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 1.67/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------